Search (111 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Böhle, K.; Riehm, U.: German fulltexts in working contexts : empirical findings on how end-users make use of fulltext databases (1989) 0.02
    0.023027891 = product of:
      0.0633267 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=2877,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=2877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
        0.02994385 = weight(_text_:k in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02994385 = score(doc=2877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the result of a brief review of West German full text data bases and a user survey of over 40 users in the fields of medicine, law and economics. Questions common assumptions about the advantages and disadvantages of full text data bases.
    Pages
    S.505-512
    Type
    a
  2. Stegentritt, E.: EMIR: Multilinguales Freitextretrieval Projekt (1992) 0.02
    0.021622837 = product of:
      0.0594628 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = product of:
          0.021755882 = sum of:
            0.021755882 = weight(_text_:h in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021755882 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066271294 = score(doc=3149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
        0.03779129 = weight(_text_:u in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03779129 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Pages
    S.179-186
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
    Type
    a
  3. Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990) 0.02
    0.02079955 = product of:
      0.076265015 = sum of:
        0.010822058 = weight(_text_:a in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010822058 = score(doc=2043,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.3530471 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=2043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
        0.0598877 = weight(_text_:k in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0598877 = score(doc=2043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    International classification. 17(1990), S.77-84
    Type
    a
  4. Markey, K.; Atherton, P.; Newton, C.: ¬An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches (1980) 0.02
    0.0171081 = product of:
      0.062729694 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.05240174 = weight(_text_:k in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05240174 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Online review. 4(1980), S.225-236
    Type
    a
  5. Warner, A.J.: ¬The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval (1994) 0.02
    0.015105689 = product of:
      0.055387523 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
        0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045059573 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.265-275
    Source
    Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
    Type
    a
  6. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.01
    0.011114508 = product of:
      0.030564897 = sum of:
        0.010255822 = product of:
          0.020511644 = sum of:
            0.020511644 = weight(_text_:h in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020511644 = score(doc=5937,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.014407388 = product of:
          0.028814776 = sum of:
            0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028814776 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 54(2001) H.1, S.55-62
    Type
    a
  7. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.01
    0.011114508 = product of:
      0.030564897 = sum of:
        0.010255822 = product of:
          0.020511644 = sum of:
            0.020511644 = weight(_text_:h in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020511644 = score(doc=1169,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.014407388 = product of:
          0.028814776 = sum of:
            0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028814776 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
    Type
    a
  8. Silva, E.M. da: Comparing the use of full text search between a conventional IR System and a DBMS (2018) 0.01
    0.009104414 = product of:
      0.03338285 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=4719,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.120-127
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  9. Basch, R.: Searching full-text : tips and techniques (1992) 0.01
    0.008984739 = product of:
      0.032944042 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=5050,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
        0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025748327 = score(doc=5050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=5050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Gives tips for effective searching of full-text databases: think creatively about vocabulary and use of the OR connector to link synonyms; use truncation to pick up plurals and alternative work endings; anticipate international differences in spellimg, likie 'labor' and 'labour', and in vocabulary, like 'truck' and 'lorry'; avoid the AND operator, preferring proximity connectors like NEAR, WITHIN or PRE; use jargon instead of trying to anticipate all the abstract terminology that a writer might have used; and exploit any indexing available
    Source
    Information today. 9(1992) no.10, S.10-12
    Type
    a
  10. Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995) 0.01
    0.007966362 = product of:
      0.029209994 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=5181,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.02204492 = weight(_text_:u in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02204492 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
    Source
    New review of document and text management. 1995, no.1, S.63-83
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  11. Basch, R.: ¬Die sieben Todsünden der Volltextrecherche (1990) 0.01
    0.007827403 = product of:
      0.028700478 = sum of:
        0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027335514 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
        0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022529786 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
        0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00343714 = score(doc=2034,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    dt. Übers. - Original in: Database Nr.8(1989) S.15-23
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 41(1990), S.229-235
    Type
    a
  12. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.01
    0.007400108 = product of:
      0.02713373 = sum of:
        0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057392623 = score(doc=1795,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.10, S.881-887
    Type
    a
  13. Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995) 0.01
    0.0070836907 = product of:
      0.025973532 = sum of:
        0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055226083 = score(doc=4088,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018714907 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    So far, methods for ellipsis and anaphor resolution have been developed and the effects of anaphor resolution have been analyzed in the context of statistical information retrieval of scientific abstracts. No significant improvements has been observed. Analyzes the effects of ellipsis and anaphor resolution on proximity searching in a full text database. Anaphora and ellipsis are classified on the basis of the type of their correlates / antecedents rather than, as traditional, on the basis of their own linguistic type. The classification differentiates proper names and common nouns of basic words, compound words, and phrases. The study was carried out in a newspaper article database containing 55.000 full text articles. A set of 154 keyword pairs in different categories was created. Human resolution of keyword ellipsis and anaphora was performed to identify sentences and paragraphs which would match proximity searches after resolution. Findings indicate that ellipsis and anaphor resolution is most relevant for proper name phrases and only marginal in the other keyword categories. Therefore the recall effect of restricted resolution of proper name phrases only was analyzed for keyword pairs containing at least 1 proper name phrase. Findings indicate a recall increase of 38.2% in sentence searches, and 28.8% in paragraph searches when proper name ellipsis were resolved. The recall increase was 17.6% sentence searches, and 19.8% in paragraph searches when proper name anaphora were resolved. Some simple and computationally justifiable resolution method might be developed only for proper name phrases to support keyword based full text information retrieval. Discusses elements of such a method
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.199-216
    Type
    a
  14. Kuhlen, R.; Hess, M.S.: Passagen-Retrieval : auch eine Möglichkeit der automatischen Verknüpfung in Hypertexten (1993) 0.01
    0.0064602327 = product of:
      0.03553128 = sum of:
        0.03344806 = weight(_text_:r in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03344806 = score(doc=1947,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.38008332 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1947,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Das Passagen-Retrieval erlaubt explorierendes Navigieren in Volltextdatenbanken, aber auch in textorientierten Hypertextbasen. Es wird experimentell an fünf, im Information Retrieval geläufigen Assoziationskoeffizienten überprüft, inwieweit mit ihnen Textpassagen, gewonnen aus der Konversion von Absätzen aus einer Buchvorlage (Hypertextbuch von R. Kuhlen, 1991b), automatisch verknüpft werden können. Voraussetzung für die Anwendung der Maße ist eine Volltextinvertierung mit linguistisch abgesicherter Stammformenreduktion. Die Ergebnisse, gewonnen aus der Bewertung der Verknüpfungsangebote entsprechend den Berechnungen nach den fünf Koeffizienten und aus dem Vergleich mit einer intellektuellen Verknüpfungsvorgabe, zeigen eine deutliche Präferenz zugunsten des Asymmetrie-Maßes, das vielleicht noch durch eine Kombination mit dem Cosinus-Maß verbessert werden könnte. Die automatisch erstellten Verknüpfungsangebote sind sowohl im Autoren-Modus zur Unterstützung des Aufbaus von Hypertextbasen sinnvoll als auch im Lese-Modus als Möglichkeit des assoziativen Navigierens in großen Hypertextbasen verwendbar.
    Pages
    17 S
    Type
    r
  15. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.0063908547 = product of:
      0.023433134 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=7701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.014407388 = product of:
          0.028814776 = sum of:
            0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028814776 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Source
    Library technology news. 9(1993), S.3-4
    Type
    a
  16. Huschens, C.: Freitextindexierung in der Parlamentsdokumentation (1986) 0.01
    0.0062778774 = product of:
      0.023018884 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = product of:
          0.025381863 = sum of:
            0.025381863 = weight(_text_:h in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025381863 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.58?-59?
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1986, Freiburg, 8.-10.10.1986: Bedarfsorientierte Fachinformation: Methoden und Techniken am Arbeitsplatz. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
    Type
    a
  17. Pipp, E.: Volltextdatenbanken im Vergleich (2001) 0.01
    0.0062778774 = product of:
      0.023018884 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = product of:
          0.025381863 = sum of:
            0.025381863 = weight(_text_:h in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025381863 = score(doc=6509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=6509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=6509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.9, S.1061-1078
    Type
    a
  18. Moukdad, H.; Large, A.: Information retrieval from full-text arabic databases : can search engines designed for English do the job? (2001) 0.01
    0.005910413 = product of:
      0.021671513 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = product of:
          0.021755882 = sum of:
            0.021755882 = weight(_text_:h in 6142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021755882 = score(doc=6142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 6142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 6142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066271294 = score(doc=6142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6142)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 6142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=6142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6142)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Libri. 51(2001) no.2, S.63-74
    Type
    a
  19. Freitext in Informationssystemen (1985) 0.01
    0.00585171 = product of:
      0.02145627 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = product of:
          0.021755882 = sum of:
            0.021755882 = weight(_text_:h in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021755882 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
        0.00589224 = weight(_text_:s in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00589224 = score(doc=2036,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    Deutsche Fassung von 'Free text in information systems' in: International classification 12(1985) H.2, S.95-98. Wegen einiger Ungereimtheiten sollte die englische Fassung benutzt werden
    Source
    International classification. 12(1985) no.1, S.23-26
    Type
    a
  20. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01
    0.005538839 = product of:
      0.020309076 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
        0.014407388 = product of:
          0.028814776 = sum of:
            0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028814776 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Pages
    S.165-174
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 106
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…