Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  1. Svenonius, E.; Witthus, R.: Information science as a profession (1981) 0.02 
    0.017969478 = product of:
  0.065888084 = sum of:
    0.008836173 = weight(_text_:a in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008836173 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
    0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051496655 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.291-317
    Type
    a
  2. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographical classification (1990) 0.02 
    0.01545882 = product of:
  0.05668234 = sum of:
    0.007731652 = weight(_text_:a in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007731652 = score(doc=2404,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
    0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048608496 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
    0.04408984 = weight(_text_:u in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04408984 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Pages
    S.21-53
    Source
    Library classification and its functions. Int. Conf. on ..., 20.-21.6.1989, Edmonton, Alberta. Ed.: A. Nitecki u. T. Fell
    Type
    a
  3. Svenonius, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities (1992) 0.01 
    0.008833611 = product of:
  0.03238991 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=2084,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=2084,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
    0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194194 = score(doc=2084,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Classification research at any point in time is the resultant product of various philosophical, technological, social, economic, and political forces. This address attemps first to give a partial description of the present state of classification research as determined by one of these forces: philosophy, in particular the 20th century analytic philosophies of logical positivism, linguistic analysis and systems analysis; and, second, assuming the continued influence of these, to speculate upon the future of classification research in terms of its prospects, problems and possibilities
    Pages
    S.5-25
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
    Type
    a
  4. Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979) 0.01 
    0.006625209 = product of:
  0.024292432 = sum of:
    0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033135647 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
    0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018895645 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
    Pages
    S.57-79
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
    Type
    a
  5. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.01 
    0.006595857 = product of:
  0.024184808 = sum of:
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
    0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00294612 = score(doc=2114,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
    0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018895645 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Pages
    S.351-364
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
    Type
    a
  6. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.00 
    0.004968613 = product of:
  0.018218247 = sum of:
    0.007251961 = product of:
      0.014503922 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014503922 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005411029 = score(doc=3606,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=3606,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die deutsche Übersetzung in: ZfBB (1994) H.3, S.294-297
    Pages
    S.231-255
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
    Type
    a
  7. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00 
    0.0033927925 = product of:
  0.012440239 = sum of:
    0.0054389704 = product of:
      0.010877941 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010877941 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.0046582245 = weight(_text_:s in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046582245 = score(doc=1643,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
    Type
    a
  8. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 27(1983), S.76-80
    Type
    a
  9. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic control (1990) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Pages
    S.38-66
    Type
    a
  10. Svenonius, E.; Schmierer, H.P.: Current issues in the subject control of information (1977) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Library quarterly. 47(1977), S.326-346
    Type
    a
  11. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.00 
    0.0018778095 = product of:
  0.010327952 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
    0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048608496 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Pages
    S.82-109
    Type
    a
  12. Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978) 0.00 
    0.0018423538 = product of:
  0.010132946 = sum of:
    0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006695806 = score(doc=2623,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization 43(2016) no.6, S.462-473.
    Source
    International classification. 5(1978), S.134-141
    Type
    a
  13. Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991) 0.00 
    0.0016980345 = product of:
  0.009339189 = sum of:
    0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005411029 = score(doc=1155,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    0.00392816 = weight(_text_:s in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00392816 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    A model system, the Dewey Online Retrieval System (DORS), was implemented as an interface to an online catalog for the purpose of experimenting with classification-based search strategies and generally seeking further understanding of the role of traditional classifications in automated information retrieval. Specifications for a classification retrieval interface were enumerated and rationalized and the system was developed in accordance with them. The feature that particularly distinguishes the system and enables it to meet its stated specifications is an automatically generated chain index
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.359-375
    Type
    a
  14. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.00 
    0.0016593148 = product of:
  0.009126231 = sum of:
    0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006695806 = score(doc=5612,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.2, S.5-40
    Type
    a
  15. Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998) 0.00 
    0.0016593148 = product of:
  0.009126231 = sum of:
    0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006695806 = score(doc=2838,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a project to explore ways of reconfiguring AACR2 for use in an automated environment. A subset of AACR2 title proper rules for books was chosen for analysis. A functional classification of the rule subset was developed, based on the 4 facets: Source, Choice, Form, and Definition. The rules were also classified according to whether they were core or peripheral. A prototype electronic interface was developed for searching and displaying the classified rules. The greatest problem in the rule reconfiguration stemmed from the structural problems of AACR2: rule groupings combining multiple subfacets under a single rule; rule redundancy; and rule scatter, between chapters, and between sections of chapters and appendices
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.1, S.3-24
    Type
    a
  16. Svenonius, E.: Ranganathan and classification science (1992) 0.00 
    0.0016410447 = product of:
  0.009025746 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This article discusses some of Ranganathan's contributions to the productive, practical and theoretical aspects of classification science. These include: (1) a set of design criteria to guide the designing of schemes for knowledge / subject classification; (2) a conceptual framework for organizing the universe of subjects; and (3) an understanding of the general principles underlying subject disciplines and classificatory languages. It concludes that Ranganathan has contributed significantly to laying the foundations for a science of subject classification.
    Source
    Libri. 42(1992), S.176-183
    Type
    a
  17. Svenonius, E.: ¬An ideal classification for an on-line catalog (1989) 0.00 
    0.001609551 = product of:
  0.00885253 = sum of:
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
    0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041664424 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Pages
    S.35-43
    Type
    a
  18. Svenonius, E.: Indexical contents (1982) 0.00 
    0.001609551 = product of:
  0.00885253 = sum of:
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
    0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041664424 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Pages
    S.125-138
    Type
    a
  19. Svenonius, E.: Directions for research in indexing, classification, and cataloging (1981) 0.00 
    0.0014888468 = product of:
  0.008188657 = sum of:
    0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005411029 = score(doc=1891,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This paper speculates on directions for research in the field of bibliographical control, where bibliographical control is taken to include indexing, classification, and cataloging. The approach taken is to consider questions in the field that need answering. The position taken is that while concerns of a how-to-do-it nature drive this field's research, which is of an evaluative or developmental nature, there is a strong need for this research to be backed by basic theoretical research
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 25(1981), S.88-103
    Type
    a
  20. McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: More on improved browsable displays for online subject access (1991) 0.00 
    0.0014359142 = product of:
  0.007897528 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=1066,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Key problems of subject searches in online public access catalogs are that too much may be retrieved and that the display may be arranged in what appears to be an unintuitive and unhelpful manner. A study was undertaken on one large database to determine how often the display of a subject and its modifications and subdivisions extended over more than two screens and what the results on display would be of compressing geographic subdivisions and other modifications. The study then addressed the question of how often the display of a term and its subdivisions was interrupted by the appearance in the display of inverted headings, phrase headings, and headings with parenthetical qualifiers
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 10(1991), S.185-191
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 32
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes