Search (65 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Schwarz, S.: Kompetenzvermittlung digital : how to ... RDA? : Konzeption eines digitalen Lernangebots an der Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln (2021) 0.02 
    0.018425643 = product of:
  0.05067052 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
    0.018298957 = product of:
      0.07319583 = sum of:
        0.07319583 = weight(_text_:o in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07319583 = score(doc=380,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5487659 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=380,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/5695. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5702.
    Location
    K
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-10
    Type
    a
  2. Wiesenmüller, H.: Formale Erschließung (2023) 0.02 
    0.016340546 = product of:
  0.0449365 = sum of:
    0.0054389704 = product of:
      0.010877941 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010877941 = score(doc=784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=784,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
    0.03272822 = weight(_text_:u in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03272822 = score(doc=784,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.3759712 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    Bei der formalen Erschließung bzw. Formalerschließung, die auch als formale Analyse, formale Erfassung, Formalbeschreibung oder (Formal-)Katalogisierung bezeichnet wird, "werden Ressourcen gemäß festgelegten Regeln nach äußerlichen, formalen Kriterien beschrieben und auffindbar gemacht". Diese Ressourcen können alle Arten von physischen und digitalen Objekten sein, die z. B. in Bibliotheken, Archiven, Museen oder Dokumentationsstellen gesammelt oder verzeichnet werden. Formale Aspekte bei einem gedruckten Buch sind u. a. der*die Autor*in, der Titel, der Verlag, das Erscheinungsdatum, der Umfang und die ISBN. Bei einer Skulptur sind es u. a. der*die Künstler*in, das Entstehungsdatum, Werkstoff und Technik, die Maße und die Besitzgeschichte. Bei einem im Internet zur Verfügung gestellten digitalen Foto sind es u. a. der*die Fotograf*in, der Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme und die Koordinaten des Aufnahmeorts, technische Daten zur Aufnahme (z. B. Belichtungszeit), der Dateiname, das Dateiformat und die Dateigröße sowie die URL und ggf. ein Persistent Identifier (z. B. DOI oder URN).
    Pages
    S.207-218
    Type
    a
  3. Hoffman, G.L.; Snow, K.: Cataloging and classification : back to basics: introduction (2021) 0.01 
    0.014664084 = product of:
  0.053768307 = sum of:
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
    0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041664424 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
    0.044915777 = weight(_text_:k in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044915777 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.73-76
    Type
    a
  4. Alker-Windbichler, S.; Bauer, K.-H.; Bruckner, W.; Cerny, N.; Kiegler-Griensteidl, M.; Labner, J.: Exemplarspezifische Erschließung im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund : Ergebnisse einer Arbeitsgruppe der Zentralen Redaktion (2022) 0.01 
    0.013239796 = product of:
  0.036409438 = sum of:
    0.0076918663 = product of:
      0.0153837325 = sum of:
        0.0153837325 = weight(_text_:h in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0153837325 = score(doc=485,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033135647 = score(doc=485,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
    0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00294612 = score(doc=485,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
    0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022457888 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Location
    A
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 74(2021) H.2, S.205-233
    Type
    a
  5. Lackner, K.; Schilhan, L.: ¬Der Einzug der EDV im österreichischen Bibliothekswesen am Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek Graz (2022) 0.01 
    0.012106781 = product of:
  0.033293646 = sum of:
    0.0054389704 = product of:
      0.010877941 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010877941 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033135647 = score(doc=476,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
    0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022457888 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Location
    A
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 74(2021) H.2, S.171-204
    Type
    a
  6. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.01 
    0.011940886 = product of:
  0.032837436 = sum of:
    0.0033818933 = weight(_text_:a in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033818933 = score(doc=883,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018714907 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.009004618 = product of:
      0.018009236 = sum of:
        0.018009236 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018009236 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
    Type
    a
  7. Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021) 0.01 
    0.010056371 = product of:
  0.027655018 = sum of:
    0.004532476 = product of:
      0.009064952 = sum of:
        0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009064952 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019525366 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
    0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024550997 = score(doc=373,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
    0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018714907 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Pages
    S.229-256
    Type
    a
  8. Preminger, M.; Rype, I.; Ådland, M.K.; Massey, D.; Tallerås, K.: ¬The public library metadata landscape : the case of Norway 2017-2018 (2020) 0.01 
    0.009099804 = product of:
  0.033365946 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=5802,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5802,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=5802,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to gauge the cataloging practices within the public library sector seen from the catalog with Norway as a case, based on a sample of records from public libraries and cataloging agencies. Findings suggest that libraries make few changes to records they import from central agencies, and that larger libraries make more changes than smaller libraries. Findings also suggest that libraries catalog and modify records with their patrons in mind, and though the extent is not large, cataloging proficiency is still required in the public library domain, at least in larger libraries, in order to ensure correct and consistent metadata.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.2, S.127-148
    Type
    a
  9. Dunsire, G.; Fritz, D.; Fritz, R.: Instructions, interfaces, and interoperable data : the RIMMF experience with RDA revisited (2020) 0.01 
    0.008098599 = product of:
  0.02969486 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=5751,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    This article presents a case study of RIMMF, a software tool developed to improve the orientation and training of catalogers who use Resource Description and Access (RDA) to maintain bibliographic data. The cataloging guidance and instructions of RDA are based on the Functional Requirements conceptual models that are now consolidated in the IFLA Library Reference Model, but many catalogers are applying RDA in systems that have evolved from inventory and text-processing applications developed from older metadata paradigms. The article describes how RIMMF interacts with the RDA Toolkit and RDA Registry to offer cataloger-friendly multilingual data input and editing interfaces.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.44-58
    Type
    a
  10. Uhlemann, S.; Hammer, A.: Retrokonversion von 1,2 Millionen Zettelkarten in 1,5 Jahren (2021) 0.01 
    0.006982343 = product of:
  0.025601923 = sum of:
    0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003865826 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
    0.018298957 = product of:
      0.07319583 = sum of:
        0.07319583 = weight(_text_:o in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07319583 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5487659 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/5695. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5695.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-8
    Type
    a
  11. Kyprianos, K.; Efthymiou, F.; Kouis, D.: Students' perceptions on cataloging course (2022) 0.01 
    0.006881903 = product of:
  0.025233643 = sum of:
    0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004782719 = score(doc=623,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
    0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018714907 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Cataloging and metadata description is one of the major competencies that a trainee cataloger must conquer. According to recent research results, library and information studies students experience difficulties understanding the theory, the terminology, and the tools necessary for cataloging. The experimental application of teaching models which derive from predominant learning theories, such as behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism, may help in detecting the difficulties of a cataloging course and in suggesting efficient solutions. This paper presents in detail three teaching models applied for a cataloging course and investigates their effectiveness, based on a survey of 126 first-year students. The survey employed the Kirkpatrick model aiming to record undergraduate students' perceptions and feelings about cataloging. The results revealed that, although a positive change in students' behavior towards cataloging has been achieved, they still do not feel very confident about the skills they have acquired. Moreover, students felt that practicing cataloging more frequently will eliminate their difficulties. Finally, they emphasized the need for face to face courses, as the survey took place in the coronavirus pandemic, during which the courses were held via distance learning.
    Source
    Libri. 72(2022) no.2, S.171-182
    Type
    a
  12. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.01 
    0.005538839 = product of:
  0.020309076 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
    0.014407388 = product of:
      0.028814776 = sum of:
        0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028814776 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.1-27
    Type
    a
  13. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.01 
    0.005028477 = product of:
  0.018437749 = sum of:
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=941,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
    0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00294612 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
    0.010805541 = product of:
      0.021611081 = sum of:
        0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021611081 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
    Type
    a
  14. Kyprianos, K.; Lolou, E.; Efthymiou, F.: Cataloging quality and the views of catalogers in Hellenic academic libraries (2022) 0.00 
    0.0048211203 = product of:
  0.02651616 = sum of:
    0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040582716 = score(doc=1146,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
    0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022457888 = score(doc=1146,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This study focuses on cataloging quality and how it is defined by information professionals, specifically university library catalogers. Although there is no single and objective definition of 'cataloging quality,' research aims to specify its core characteristics. The goal is to define the modern cataloging environment, as well as the tools and opportunities it provides, and to improve the success of academic library services for both professional catalogers and users, who are the final consumers of the information. Regarding methodology, a sample survey was chosen. The survey results revealed that the quality of cataloging is determined by several factors, including technical features of the data, adherence to standards, the cataloging process, user satisfaction, and the development of a general quality culture.
    Type
    a
  15. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.00 
    0.003994284 = product of:
  0.014645709 = sum of:
    0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039050733 = score(doc=5930,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
    0.009004618 = product of:
      0.018009236 = sum of:
        0.018009236 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018009236 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
    Type
    a
  16. Dutkiewicz, S.M.: Application of faceted vocabularies to cataloging of textbooks (2023) 0.00 
    0.003447741 = product of:
  0.012641717 = sum of:
    0.006345466 = product of:
      0.012690932 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012690932 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003865826 = score(doc=1179,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the practical application of faceted vocabularies to the cataloging of textbooks. Consistent application of faceted vocabularies, specifically Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms for Library and Archival Materials (LCGFT) and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), would enhance the discovery of these resources. Alternatives to special cases in Subject Heading Manual H 2187 are proposed. A case study demonstrating the application of LCDGT is provided. Figures illustrate the results of the proposed best practices. The article includes four tables that are designed to streamline term assignments. Consistent cataloging of genre and audience prepares legacy records for future automated enhancement.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.661-685
    Type
    a
  17. Soos, C.; Leazer, H.H.: Presentations of authorship in knowledge organization (2020) 0.00 
    0.003013967 = product of:
  0.011051212 = sum of:
    0.004532476 = product of:
      0.009064952 = sum of:
        0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009064952 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004782719 = score(doc=21,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The "author" is a concept central to many publication and documentation practices, often carrying legal, professional, social, and personal importance. Typically viewed as the solitary owner of their creations, a person is held responsible for their work and positioned to receive the praise and criticism that may emerge in its wake. Although the role of the individual within creative production is undeniable, literary (Foucault 1977; Bloom 1997) and knowledge organization (Moulaison et. al. 2014) theorists have challenged the view that the work of one person can-or should-be fully detached from their professional and personal networks. As these relationships often provide important context and reveal the role of community in the creation of new things, their absence from catalog records presents a falsely simplified view of the creative process. Here, we address the consequences of what we call the "author-asowner" concept and suggest that an "author-as-node" approach, which situates an author within their networks of influence, may allow for more relational representation within knowledge organization systems, a framing that emphasizes rather than erases the messy complexities that affect the production of new objects and ideas.
    Content
    Part of a special issue: The politics of knowledge organization, Part 2; guest editors: Robert D. Montoya and Gregory H. Leazer. DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-6-486.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.6, S.486-500
    Type
    a
  18. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 1982-2020Salman (2021) 0.00 
    0.0025470515 = product of:
  0.014008783 = sum of:
    0.008116543 = weight(_text_:a in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008116543 = score(doc=674,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
    0.00589224 = weight(_text_:s in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00589224 = score(doc=674,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.1, S.53-57
    Type
    a
  19. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations (2020) 0.00 
    0.002276249 = product of:
  0.012519369 = sum of:
    0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066271294 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
    0.00589224 = weight(_text_:s in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00589224 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.28-43
    Type
    a
  20. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00 
    0.0022650678 = product of:
  0.012457873 = sum of:
    0.006345466 = product of:
      0.012690932 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012690932 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006112407 = score(doc=1156,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Social cataloging websites, such as Goodreads, LibraryThing, and StoryGraph are widely popular with individuals who want to track their reading and read reviews. Goodreads is one of the most popular sites with 90 million registered users as of 2019. This paper studies a Goodreads cataloging rule, NOT A BOOK (NAB), through which users designate items as invalid to the site's scope while preserving some of their metadata. By reviewing NAB, we identify thirteen types of invalid items. We go on to discuss how these item types unevenly reflect the rule itself and the emergence of a "non-book" sense through social cataloging.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 12

Types

  • a 57
  • el 10
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications