Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jacob, E.K."
  1. Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: User-generated genre tags through the lens of genre theories (2014) 0.02 
    0.017081412 = product of:
  0.059784938 = sum of:
    0.050696887 = weight(_text_:p in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050696887 = score(doc=1450,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.42041177 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
    0.00908805 = product of:
      0.0181761 = sum of:
        0.0181761 = weight(_text_:22 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0181761 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    LIS genre studies have suggested that representing the genre of a resource could provide better knowledge representation, organization and retrieval (e.g., Andersen, 2008; Crowston & Kwasnik, 2003). Beghtol (2001) argues that genre analysis could be a useful tool for creating a "framework of analysis for a domain ... [to] structure and interpret texts, events, ideas, decisions, explanations and every other human activity in that domain" (p. 19). Although some studies of user-generated tagging vocabularies have found a preponderance of content-related tags (e.g., Munk & Mork, 2007), Lamere's (2008) study of the most frequently applied tags at Last.fm found that tags representing musical genres were favored by taggers. Studies of user-generated genre tags suggest that, unlike traditional indexing, which generally assigns a single genre, users' assignments of genre-related tags provide better representation of the fuzziness at the boundaries of genre categories (Inskip, 2009). In this way, user-generated genre tags are more in line with Bakhtin's (Bakhtin & Medvedev, 1928/1985) conceptualization of genre as an "aggregate of the means for seeing and conceptualizin reality" (p. 137). For Bakhtin (1986), genres are kinds of practice characterized by their "addressivity" (p. 95): Different genres correspond to different "conceptions of the addressee" and are "determined by that area of human activity and everyday life to which the given utterance is related" (p.95). Miller (1984) argues that genre refers to a "conventional category of discourse based in large-scale typification of rhetorical action; as action, it acquires meaning from situation and from the social context in which that situation arose" (p. 163). Genre is part of a social context that produces, reproduces, modifies and ultimately represents a particular text, but how to reunite genre and situation (or text and context) in systems of knowledge organization has not been addressed. Based on Devitt's (1993) argument suggesting that "our construction of genre is what helps us to construct a situation" (p. 577), one way to represent genre as "typified rhetorical actions based in recurrent situations" (Miller, 1984, p. 159) would be to employ genre tags generated by a particular group or community of users. This study suggests application of social network analysis to detect communities (Newman, 2006) of genre taggers and argues that communities of genre taggers can better define the nature and constitution of a discourse community while simultaneously shedding light on multifaceted representations of the resource genres.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Jacob, E.K.; Albrechtsen, H.: When essence becomes function : post-structuralist implications for an ecological theory of organizational classification systems (1999) 0.01 
    0.00567581 = product of:
  0.039730668 = sum of:
    0.039730668 = weight(_text_:u in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039730668 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  3. Jacob, E.K.; Priss, U.: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources (2001) 0.01 
    0.005618765 = product of:
  0.039331354 = sum of:
    0.039331354 = weight(_text_:u in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039331354 = score(doc=2253,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.35814235 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Advances in classification research, vol.10: proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Ed.: Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
  4. Albrechtsen, H.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬The role of classificatory structures as boundary objects in information ecologies (1998) 0.01 
    0.00532499 = product of:
  0.037274927 = sum of:
    0.037274927 = weight(_text_:i in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037274927 = score(doc=40,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In information science, classification systems are conventionally viewed as tools for representing knowledge in the universe of ideas, the human mind, or one or more sets of documents. In this view, developing and maintaining relationships and structures in classification schemes must primarily consider two abstract ingredients: i) a set of concepts for one or more domains; and ii) a (set of) unambiguous structure(s) to articulate the relationships that persist between the various concepts that comprise the classificatory structure. We contend that design decisions pertaining to the structure of a classification system consist of far more than simply creating links between the elements in a particular set of concepts. Ultimately, a simplistic tool view of classifications implies that the construction is little more than a technical task in a very narrow sense: that classificatory concepts are viewed as standard representations of what are assumed to be the central and/or important topics in the knowledge domain(s), and that there is i) an unambiguous Platonic ideal or universal consensus that determines how the links will be generated within a classificatory structure; or, conversely, ii) that there are no general structures and relationships available at all, but that only diverse individual knowledge structures exist, which cannot be reconciled into a general organization of knowledge
  5. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010) 0.00 
    0.0045184037 = product of:
  0.031628825 = sum of:
    0.031628825 = weight(_text_:i in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031628825 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  6. Loehrlein, A.; Jacob, E.K.; Lee, S.; Yang, K.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification (2006) 0.00 
    0.003973067 = product of:
  0.027811468 = sum of:
    0.027811468 = weight(_text_:u in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027811468 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  7. Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000) 0.00 
    0.0034217187 = product of:
  0.02395203 = sum of:
    0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395203 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  8. Jacob, E.K.; Albrechtsen, H.; George, N.: Empirical analysis and evaluation of a metadata scheme for representing pedagogical resources in a digital library for educators (2006) 0.00 
    0.003405486 = product of:
  0.0238384 = sum of:
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=2518,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  9. Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬A theoretical framework for operationalizing basic level categories in knowledge organization research (2012) 0.00 
    0.003405486 = product of:
  0.0238384 = sum of:
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  10. Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: Investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies : a case of wild or tamed categorization? (2014) 0.00 
    0.0022950792 = product of:
  0.016065553 = sum of:
    0.016065553 = product of:
      0.032131106 = sum of:
        0.032131106 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032131106 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    5. 9.2014 16:22:27
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Jacob, E.K.: ¬The legacy of pragmatism : implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe (2000) 0.00 
    0.0022720124 = product of:
  0.015904086 = sum of:
    0.015904086 = product of:
      0.03180817 = sum of:
        0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03180817 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Pages
    S.16-22
  12. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.00 
    0.0019474393 = product of:
  0.013632074 = sum of:
    0.013632074 = product of:
      0.027264148 = sum of:
        0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027264148 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  13. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.00 
    0.0019474393 = product of:
  0.013632074 = sum of:
    0.013632074 = product of:
      0.027264148 = sum of:
        0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027264148 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 13
  • b 1

Themes