Search (113 results, page 1 of 6)

0.0690993 = product of:
  0.1612317 = sum of:
    0.055622935 = weight(_text_:u in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055622935 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
    0.07380059 = weight(_text_:i in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07380059 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
    0.03180817 = product of:
      0.06361634 = sum of:
        0.06361634 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06361634 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Pages

S.9-22

Source

Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse: Vorträge der Arbeitsgruppe Begriffsanalyse, Darmstadt 1986. Hrsg. von B. Ganter, R. Wille u. K.E. Wolff

0.0459364 = product of:
  0.10718493 = sum of:
    0.028742433 = weight(_text_:p in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028742433 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
    0.03371259 = weight(_text_:u in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03371259 = score(doc=3941,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
    0.044729915 = weight(_text_:i in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044729915 = score(doc=3941,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Footnote

Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85

0.039485313 = product of:
  0.0921324 = sum of:
    0.031784534 = weight(_text_:u in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031784534 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
    0.042171765 = weight(_text_:i in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042171765 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
    0.0181761 = product of:
      0.0363522 = sum of:
        0.0363522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0363522 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.03700167 = product of:
  0.08633722 = sum of:
    0.03353284 = weight(_text_:p in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03353284 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
    0.036900297 = weight(_text_:i in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036900297 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
    0.015904086 = product of:
      0.03180817 = sum of:
        0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03180817 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:17:40

0.03505389 = product of:
  0.122688614 = sum of:
    0.06706568 = weight(_text_:p in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06706568 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
    0.055622935 = weight(_text_:u in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055622935 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Semantik und künstliche Intelligenz: Beiträge zur automatischen Sprachbearbeitung II. Hrsg. u. eingeleitet von P. Eisenberg

0.034497865 = product of:
  0.120742515 = sum of:
    0.057484865 = weight(_text_:p in 3936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057484865 = score(doc=3936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 3936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3936)
    0.06325765 = weight(_text_:i in 3936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06325765 = score(doc=3936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 3936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3936)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Footnote

Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?

0.03169556 = product of:
  0.11093445 = sum of:
    0.0476768 = weight(_text_:u in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0476768 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
    0.06325765 = weight(_text_:i in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06325765 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Wortschatz, Satz, Text. Beiträge der Konferenzen in Greifswald und Neubrandenburg 1992. Hrsg.: G. Bartels u. I. Pohl

0.030707784 = product of:
  0.10747724 = sum of:
    0.06774657 = weight(_text_:p in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06774657 = score(doc=2415,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.5617989 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
    0.039730668 = weight(_text_:u in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039730668 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Discourse and lexical meaning. Proceedings of a Workshop of the DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 340, Stuttgart, 30.11.-1.12.1992. Ed.: P. Bosch u. P. Gerstl

0.02697577 = product of:
  0.09441519 = sum of:
    0.019865334 = weight(_text_:u in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019865334 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
    0.074549854 = weight(_text_:i in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074549854 = score(doc=3217,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

In this chapter I propose that frames provide the fundamental representation of knowledge in human cognition. In the first section, I raise problems with the feature list representations often found in theories of knowledge, and I sketch the solutions that frames provide to them. In the second section, I examine the three fundamental concepts of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. Because frames also represents the attributes, values, structural invariants, and constraints within a frame, the mechanism that constructs frames builds them recursively. The frame theory I propose borrows heavily from previous frame theories, although its collection of representational components is somewhat unique. Furthermore, frame theorists generally assume that frames are rigid configurations of independent attributes, whereas I propose that frames are dynamic relational structures whose form is flexible and context dependent. In the third section, I illustrate how frames support a wide variety of representational tasks central to conceptual processing in natural and artificial intelligence. Frames can represent exemplars and propositions, prototypes and membership, subordinates and taxonomies. Frames can also represent conceptual combinations, event sequences, rules, and plans. In the fourth section, I show how frames define the extent of conceptual fields and how they provide a powerful productive mechanism for generating specific concepts within a field.

Source

Frames, fields and contrasts: new essays in semantic and lexical organization. Eds.: A. Lehrer u. E.F. Kittay

0.026412966 = product of:
  0.09244537 = sum of:
    0.039730668 = weight(_text_:u in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039730668 = score(doc=1224,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
    0.052714705 = weight(_text_:i in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052714705 = score(doc=1224,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: LINDNER, I.: Fachsprache: Erleichterung oder Erschwerung der Information?; HEINSOHN, G.: Vom Wesen des Begriffs; WERSIG, G.: Begriff und Begriffsinhalt: die Eindeutigkeit und Vieldeutigkeit von Begriffen als Erleichterung oder Erschwerung der Dokumentation; HASENMÜLLER, U.: Begriffe als Bausteine des Dokuments; FISCHER, K.-H.: Begriffs- (Sachverhalts-) Analyse des Dokuments

0.018489076 = product of:
  0.064711764 = sum of:
    0.027811468 = weight(_text_:u in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027811468 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
    0.036900297 = weight(_text_:i in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036900297 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Content

Enthält u.a. die folgenden Beiträge: FELBER, H.: Fachsprache aus der Sicht der Allgemeinen Terminologielehre; BUDIN, G.: Terminologie und Fachkommunikation; HOHNHOLD, I.: Fachsprache konstituierende Gegenstände, Vorgänge, Maßnahmen und Strukturen: auf dem Weg von Begriffen und Benennungen zum Fachtext; ARNTZ, R. u. E. EYDAM: Zum Verhältnis von Sprach- und Sachwissen beim Übersetzen von Fachtexten; GUNNARSON, B.-L.: Fachsprachen und soziolinguistische Theorien: eine Untersuchung über ihre Relevanz für die Fachsprachenforschung; BORNETO, C.S.: Gebrauchsanweisungen: Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Subtexte; SAGER, J.C.: The position of special languages between natural and artificial languages

0.015508575 = product of:
  0.054280013 = sum of:
    0.04064794 = weight(_text_:p in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04064794 = score(doc=3060,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
    0.013632074 = product of:
      0.027264148 = sum of:
        0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027264148 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.

Content

Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.

Source

LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx

0.0150230955 = product of:
  0.052580833 = sum of:
    0.028742433 = weight(_text_:p in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028742433 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

"Der Begriff der Gleichheit ist uns Mathematikern vielleicht der geläufigste; dennoch läßt sich schwer sagen, was wir unter ihm verstehen." - Mit diesem Satz beginnt GERHARD HESSENBERG sein Buch über die .Grundlagen der Geometrie' ([24], Berlin, 1930, §1). Er kommt nach einer ausführlichen Diskussion zum Schluß, daß die Relation der Gleichheit nichts anderes als eine Äquivalenzrelation sei, also eine symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation, und daß auch umgekehrt jede symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation eine Gleichheitsbeziehung sei. Die Begriffe Gleichheit und Äquivalenz wären demnach synonym. Schaut man im .Mathematischen Wörterbuch' von J. NAAS & H.L. SCHMID (Berlin, 1967) nach, so findet man unter dem Stichwort Gleichheit (p. 639) genau dieselbe Definition: "Die Gleichheit ist eine Äquivalenzrelation und umgekehrt kann jede Äquivalenzrelation als eine besondere Art von Gleichheit aufgefaßt werden."

0.012779976 = product of:
  0.08945983 = sum of:
    0.08945983 = weight(_text_:i in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08945983 = score(doc=3913,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Footnote

Metakritik zu den Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? und der Replik von I. Dahlberg

0.012779976 = product of:
  0.08945983 = sum of:
    0.08945983 = weight(_text_:i in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08945983 = score(doc=27,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg

0.012270293 = product of:
  0.042946026 = sum of:
    0.029040294 = weight(_text_:p in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029040294 = score(doc=5089,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.24082111 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
    0.013905734 = weight(_text_:u in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013905734 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Content

Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)

0.012049076 = product of:
  0.08434353 = sum of:
    0.08434353 = weight(_text_:i in 1613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08434353 = score(doc=1613,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 1613, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1613)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.012049076 = product of:
  0.08434353 = sum of:
    0.08434353 = weight(_text_:i in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08434353 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.01135162 = product of:
  0.079461336 = sum of:
    0.079461336 = weight(_text_:u in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079461336 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.7235568 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.010949499 = product of:
  0.07664649 = sum of:
    0.07664649 = weight(_text_:p in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07664649 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)