-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ¬The Cranfield tests on index language devices (1967)
0.03
0.030046191 = product of:
0.10516167 = sum of:
0.057484865 = weight(_text_:p in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057484865 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
0.0476768 = weight(_text_:u in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0476768 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.47-58.
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.02
0.015647277 = product of:
0.03651031 = sum of:
0.021423345 = weight(_text_:p in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021423345 = score(doc=1858,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.1776564 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.010542941 = weight(_text_:i in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010542941 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.004544025 = product of:
0.00908805 = sum of:
0.00908805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00908805 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 54(2003) no.4, S.356-357 (S.J. Lincicum): "Reliance upon shared cataloging in academic libraries in the United States has been driven largely by the need to reduce the expense of cataloging operations without muck regard for the Impact that this approach might have an the quality of the records included in local catalogs. In recent years, ever increasing pressures have prompted libraries to adopt practices such as "rapid" copy cataloging that purposely reduce the scrutiny applied to bibliographic records downloaded from shared databases, possibly increasing the number of errors that slip through unnoticed. Errors in bibliographic records can lead to serious problems for library catalog users. If the data contained in bibliographic records is inaccurate, users will have difficulty discovering and recognizing resources in a library's collection that are relevant to their needs. Thus, it has become increasingly important to understand the extent and nature of errors that occur in the records found in large shared bibliographic databases, such as OCLC WorldCat, to develop cataloging practices optimized for the shared cataloging environment. Although this monograph raises a few legitimate concerns about recent trends in cataloging practice, it fails to provide the "detailed look" at misinformation in library catalogs arising from linguistic errors and mistakes in subject analysis promised by the publisher. A basic premise advanced throughout the text is that a certain amount of linguistic and subject knowledge is required to catalog library materials effectively. The author emphasizes repeatedly that most catalogers today are asked to catalog an increasingly diverse array of materials, and that they are often required to work in languages or subject areas of which they have little or no knowledge. He argues that the records contributed to shared databases are increasingly being created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject expertise. This adversely affects the quality of individual library catalogs because errors often go uncorrected as records are downloaded from shared databases to local catalogs by copy catalogers who possess even less knowledge. Calling misinformation an "evil phenomenon," Bade states that his main goal is to discuss, "two fundamental types of misinformation found in bibliographic and authority records in library catalogs: that arising from linguistic errors, and that caused by errors in subject analysis, including missing or wrong subject headings" (p. 2). After a superficial discussion of "other" types of errors that can occur in bibliographic records, such as typographical errors and errors in the application of descriptive cataloging rules, Bade begins his discussion of linguistic errors. He asserts that sharing bibliographic records created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject knowledge has, "disastrous effects an the library community" (p. 6). To support this bold assertion, Bade provides as evidence little more than a laundry list of errors that he has personally observed in bibliographic records over the years. When he eventually cites several studies that have addressed the availability and quality of records available for materials in languages other than English, he fails to describe the findings of these studies in any detail, let alone relate the findings to his own observations in a meaningful way. Bade claims that a lack of linguistic expertise among catalogers is the "primary source for linguistic misinformation in our databases" (p. 10), but he neither cites substantive data from existing studies nor provides any new data regarding the overall level of linguistic knowledge among catalogers to support this claim. The section concludes with a brief list of eight sensible, if unoriginal, suggestions for coping with the challenge of cataloging materials in unfamiliar languages.
Bade begins his discussion of errors in subject analysis by summarizing the contents of seven records containing what he considers to be egregious errors. The examples were drawn only from items that he has encountered in the course of his work. Five of the seven records were full-level ("I" level) records for Eastern European materials created between 1996 and 2000 in the OCLC WorldCat database. The final two examples were taken from records created by Bade himself over an unspecified period of time. Although he is to be commended for examining the actual items cataloged and for examining mostly items that he claims to have adequate linguistic and subject expertise to evaluate reliably, Bade's methodology has major flaws. First and foremost, the number of examples provided is completely inadequate to draw any conclusions about the extent of the problem. Although an in-depth qualitative analysis of a small number of records might have yielded some valuable insight into factors that contribute to errors in subject analysis, Bade provides no Information about the circumstances under which the live OCLC records he critiques were created. Instead, he offers simplistic explanations for the errors based solely an his own assumptions. He supplements his analysis of examples with an extremely brief survey of other studies regarding errors in subject analysis, which consists primarily of criticism of work done by Sheila Intner. In the end, it is impossible to draw any reliable conclusions about the nature or extent of errors in subject analysis found in records in shared bibliographic databases based an Bade's analysis. In the final third of the essay, Bade finally reveals his true concern: the deintellectualization of cataloging. It would strengthen the essay tremendously to present this as the primary premise from the very beginning, as this section offers glimpses of a compelling argument. Bade laments, "Many librarians simply do not sec cataloging as an intellectual activity requiring an educated mind" (p. 20). Commenting an recent trends in copy cataloging practice, he declares, "The disaster of our time is that this work is being done more and more by people who can neither evaluate nor correct imported errors and offen are forbidden from even thinking about it" (p. 26). Bade argues that the most valuable content found in catalog records is the intellectual content contributed by knowledgeable catalogers, and he asserts that to perform intellectually demanding tasks such as subject analysis reliably and effectively, catalogers must have the linguistic and subject knowledge required to gain at least a rudimentary understanding of the materials that they describe. He contends that requiring catalogers to quickly dispense with materials in unfamiliar languages and subjects clearly undermines their ability to perform the intellectual work of cataloging and leads to an increasing number of errors in the bibliographic records contributed to shared databases.
-
Broxis, P.F.: ASSIA social science information service (1989)
0.02
0.015039567 = product of:
0.105276965 = sum of:
0.105276965 = product of:
0.21055393 = sum of:
0.21055393 = weight(_text_:p.f in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21055393 = score(doc=1511,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2528145 = queryWeight, product of:
7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.8328396 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996)
0.01
0.01437411 = product of:
0.050309382 = sum of:
0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02395203 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.026357353 = weight(_text_:i in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026357353 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
-
Lin, Y,-l.; Trattner, C.; Brusilovsky, P.; He, D.: ¬The impact of image descriptions on user tagging behavior : a study of the nature and functionality of crowdsourced tags (2015)
0.01
0.0114992885 = product of:
0.040247507 = sum of:
0.019161623 = weight(_text_:p in 2159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019161623 = score(doc=2159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 2159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2159)
0.021085883 = weight(_text_:i in 2159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021085883 = score(doc=2159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 2159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2159)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Crowdsourcing has emerged as a way to harvest social wisdom from thousands of volunteers to perform a series of tasks online. However, little research has been devoted to exploring the impact of various factors such as the content of a resource or crowdsourcing interface design on user tagging behavior. Although images' titles and descriptions are frequently available in image digital libraries, it is not clear whether they should be displayed to crowdworkers engaged in tagging. This paper focuses on offering insight to the curators of digital image libraries who face this dilemma by examining (i) how descriptions influence the user in his/her tagging behavior and (ii) how this relates to the (a) nature of the tags, (b) the emergent folksonomy, and (c) the findability of the images in the tagging system. We compared two different methods for collecting image tags from Amazon's Mechanical Turk's crowdworkers-with and without image descriptions. Several properties of generated tags were examined from different perspectives: diversity, specificity, reusability, quality, similarity, descriptiveness, and so on. In addition, the study was carried out to examine the impact of image description on supporting users' information seeking with a tag cloud interface. The results showed that the properties of tags are affected by the crowdsourcing approach. Tags from the "with description" condition are more diverse and more specific than tags from the "without description" condition, while the latter has a higher tag reuse rate. A user study also revealed that different tag sets provided different support for search. Tags produced "with description" shortened the path to the target results, whereas tags produced without description increased user success in the search task.
-
Zunde, P.; Dexter, M.E.: Indexing consistency and quality (1969)
0.01
0.010949499 = product of:
0.07664649 = sum of:
0.07664649 = weight(_text_:p in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07664649 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Pimenov, E.N.: O faktorah, vliyayushchikh na indeksirivanie : indeksirovanie i predmetnaya oblast' (2000)
0.01
0.009036807 = product of:
0.06325765 = sum of:
0.06325765 = weight(_text_:i in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06325765 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Zunde, P.; Dexter, M.E.: Factors affecting indexing performance (1969)
0.01
0.008212124 = product of:
0.057484865 = sum of:
0.057484865 = weight(_text_:p in 7496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057484865 = score(doc=7496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 7496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7496)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Reich, P.; Biever, E.J.: Indexing consistency : The input/output function of thesauri (1991)
0.01
0.0054747495 = product of:
0.038323246 = sum of:
0.038323246 = weight(_text_:p in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038323246 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Wilson, P.: ¬The end of specifity (1979)
0.01
0.0054747495 = product of:
0.038323246 = sum of:
0.038323246 = weight(_text_:p in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038323246 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Evedove, P.R. Dal; Evedove Tartarotti, R.C. Dal; Lopes Fujita, M.S.: Verbal protocols in Brazilian information science : a perspective from indexing studies (2018)
0.00
0.004540648 = product of:
0.031784534 = sum of:
0.031784534 = weight(_text_:u in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031784534 = score(doc=4783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs (2006)
0.00
0.003973067 = product of:
0.027811468 = sum of:
0.027811468 = weight(_text_:u in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027811468 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
0.0038948786 = product of:
0.027264148 = sum of:
0.027264148 = product of:
0.054528296 = sum of:
0.054528296 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054528296 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Gil-Leiva, I.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.: Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors (2007)
0.00
0.0037653362 = product of:
0.026357353 = sum of:
0.026357353 = weight(_text_:i in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026357353 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Hughes, A.V.; Rafferty, P.: Inter-indexer consistency in graphic materials indexing at the National Library of Wales (2011)
0.00
0.0034217187 = product of:
0.02395203 = sum of:
0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02395203 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Rodriguez Bravo, B.: ¬The visibility of women in indexing languages (2006)
0.00
0.003405486 = product of:
0.0238384 = sum of:
0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0238384 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.00
0.0025965858 = product of:
0.0181761 = sum of:
0.0181761 = product of:
0.0363522 = sum of:
0.0363522 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0363522 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
0.0022720124 = product of:
0.015904086 = sum of:
0.015904086 = product of:
0.03180817 = sum of:
0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03180817 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
0.0022720124 = product of:
0.015904086 = sum of:
0.015904086 = product of:
0.03180817 = sum of:
0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03180817 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
0.0019474393 = product of:
0.013632074 = sum of:
0.013632074 = product of:
0.027264148 = sum of:
0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027264148 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.033538654 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
