Search (95 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.09 
    0.09141217 = product of:
  0.21329507 = sum of:
    0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395203 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
    0.14369076 = weight(_text_:hayes in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14369076 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2953587 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.48649582 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
    0.045652278 = weight(_text_:i in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045652278 = score(doc=2627,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.36089116 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
    Issue
    Final report. Phase I: Descriptive cataloging.
  2. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.03 
    0.03347932 = product of:
  0.07811841 = sum of:
    0.04064794 = weight(_text_:p in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04064794 = score(doc=54,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
    0.013632074 = product of:
      0.027264148 = sum of:
        0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027264148 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  3. Polidoro, P.: Using qualitative methods to analyze online catalog interfaces (2015) 0.02 
    0.024490783 = product of:
  0.08571774 = sum of:
    0.03353284 = weight(_text_:p in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03353284 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
    0.0521849 = weight(_text_:i in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0521849 = score(doc=1879,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Many experts have proposed an evolution toward "next generation catalogs," whose main features are partly inspired by commercial websites such as Google or Amazon. This article examines pros and cons of this integration. It also aims to show how a qualitative approach helps to broaden understanding of web communication mechanisms. After discussing some examples of "next generation catalog" features, I analyze the interface of an online catalog responding to different users' information needs and seeking behaviors. In the conclusion I suggest that the right approach to integration is a "translation" (not a "copy and paste") between commercial and library logics.
  4. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.02 
    0.022233138 = product of:
  0.07781598 = sum of:
    0.059639882 = weight(_text_:i in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059639882 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
    0.0181761 = product of:
      0.0363522 = sum of:
        0.0363522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0363522 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
    Language
    i
    Location
    I
  5. Mönnich, M.; Dierolf, U.: 20 Jahre Karlsruher virtueller Katalog (KVK) (2016) 0.02 
    0.021130372 = product of:
  0.073956296 = sum of:
    0.031784534 = weight(_text_:u in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031784534 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
    0.042171765 = weight(_text_:i in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042171765 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2016-05/fachbeitrag-dierolf.pdf.
  6. Enhancing access to information : designing catalogs for the 21st century (1992) 0.02 
    0.019534934 = product of:
  0.068372265 = sum of:
    0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 1009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395203 = score(doc=1009,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1009, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1009)
    0.04442024 = weight(_text_:u in 1009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04442024 = score(doc=1009,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.40448055 = fieldWeight in 1009, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1009)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: TYCKOSON, D.A.: Enhancing access to information: building catalogs for the future; TYCKOSON, D.A.: The twenty-first century limited: desinging catalogs for the next century; DWYER, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement: from the drawing board to the catalog screen; SYRACUSE, R.O. u. R.K. POYER: Enhancing access to the library's collections: a view from an academic health center library; STUDWELL, W.E.: Of eggs and baskets: getting more access out of LC Subject Headings in an online environment; STEPHENS, I.E.: Getting more out of call numbers: displaying holdings, locations and circulation status; MICCO, M.: The next generation of online public access catalogs: a new look at subject access using hypermedia; SLOAN, B.G.: Remote access: design implications for the online catalog; ENGEL, G.: User instruction for access to catalogs and database on the Internet; BARNES, S. u. J. McCUE: Linking library records to bibliographic databases: an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola and the OPAC; HARWOOD, R.: Adding a nonlibrary campus collection to the library database; CARTER, K., H. OLSEN u. S. AQUILA: Bulk loading of records for microform sets into the online catalogue; DYKEMAN, A. u. J. ZIMMERMAN: The Georgia Institute of Technology Electronic Library: issues to consider; MOLHOLT, P. u. K. FORSYTHE: Opening up information access through the electronic catalog
  7. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02 
    0.017843084 = product of:
  0.062450793 = sum of:
    0.039730668 = weight(_text_:u in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039730668 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
    0.022720125 = product of:
      0.04544025 = sum of:
        0.04544025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04544025 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  8. Danowski, P.; Heller, L.: Bibliothek 2.0 : Die Zukunft der Bibliothek? (2006) 0.02 
    0.017493417 = product of:
  0.061226957 = sum of:
    0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395203 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
    0.037274927 = weight(_text_:i in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037274927 = score(doc=68,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Der Begriff Bibliothek 2.0 (bzw. Library 2.0) lehnt sich an die Begrifflichkeit des Web 2.0 an. Beide Begriffe sind für die bibliothekarische Welt relativ neu und werden bisher hauptsächlich im angloamerikanischen Raum diskutiert. Einige Bereiche des "neuen" Webs werden auch in Deutschland von Bibliothekaren diskutiert, so beispielsweise Weblogs und die Wikipedia. Die Betrachtung sollte hier jedoch nicht enden, sondern vielmehr als Startpunkt dienen. Über den Begriff als solchen kann man sicherlich streiten, jedoch hat er sich als tauglich erwiesen, um bestimmte Veränderungen zu beschreiben. So schreibt Michael Stephens, der den Begriff entscheidend mitprägte, im ALA TechSource Weblog: "I am so pleased with the discussion - and no matter what name you use, I love that the innovations and plans just keep rolling on."
  9. Advances in online public access catalogs : Vol.1 (1992) 0.02 
    0.01667423 = product of:
  0.0583598 = sum of:
    0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395203 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
    0.034407772 = weight(_text_:u in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034407772 = score(doc=4653,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future
  10. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01 
    0.012663206 = product of:
  0.04432122 = sum of:
    0.026145121 = product of:
      0.1307256 = sum of:
        0.1307256 = weight(_text_:schneider in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1307256 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22271816 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.640641 = idf(docFreq=156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.5869553 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.640641 = idf(docFreq=156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0181761 = product of:
      0.0363522 = sum of:
        0.0363522 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0363522 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  11. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01 
    0.012490158 = product of:
  0.04371555 = sum of:
    0.027811468 = weight(_text_:u in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027811468 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
    0.015904086 = product of:
      0.03180817 = sum of:
        0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03180817 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Source
    Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
  12. Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph! : Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe) (2002) 0.01 
    0.012445984 = product of:
  0.043560944 = sum of:
    0.02247506 = weight(_text_:u in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02247506 = score(doc=536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
    0.021085883 = weight(_text_:i in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021085883 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    In schätzungsweise jedem vierten deutschen Zeitungsartikel und InternetDokument, in dem der italienische Vorname Giuseppe enthalten ist, taucht der Fehler auf, sei nun die Rede von Verdi, Arcimboldo oder Garibaldi: Giuseppe wird falsch geschrieben, nämlich als *Guiseppe, als handele sich um eine Variante von Guido, was dem deutschen Auge offensichtlich vertrauter ist. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Buchstaben "i" und "u° auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander liegen, was der Tippfehleranfälligkeit Vorschub leistet. Lässt man die Internet-Suchmaschine Google "Seiten auf deutsch" absuchen, findet sie 61.500 Giuseppes und 15.200 *Guiseppes (über 25%). Google ist übrigens seit neuestem so "intelligent', bei der falschen Eingabe zu fragen: "Meinten Sie Giuseppe?'. Schränkt man die Suchmaschine auf italienisch-sprachige Seiten ein, sinkt der Anteil der falschen Schreibweise auf 0,54 % (426.000 richtige gegen 2.330 falsche). Bei genauerem Hinsehen tauchen die meisten der Falschschreibungen bei offenbar amerikanischen dot-com-Seiten auf, die italienische Genealogien aufschlüsseln. Die genuin aus Italien stammenden Seiten weisen nur in den allerwenigsten Fällen den Fehler auf. Dieses Phänomen fiel mir als Romanistin zunächst auf, dann störte es mich, später belustigte es mich beinahe und schließlich wurde die Suche danach fast zum Spiel. Unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten ist der Fehler ein Ärgernis, hat sich doch diese falsche Schreibweise massenhaft in bibliothekarische Datenbanken eingeschlichen. Als ich schon vor Jahren eine Düsseldorfer Diplombibliothekarin darauf ansprach, widersprach diese und behauptete, es gebe sehr wohl den Namen in der Schreibweise *Guiseppe neben der - vielleicht üblicheren - Form Giuseppe. Und tatsächlich findet sich die falsche Form in manchen Vornamenbüchern - so oft schon wurde der Fehler tradiert, dass er jetzt schon legitimiert erscheint. Schlägt man hingegen in italienischen Vornamenbüchern nach, zeigt sich, dass man hier vergeblich nach *Guiseppe suchen muss.
  13. Petschar, H.; Strouhal, E.; Zobernig, H.: ¬Der Zettelkatalog : Ein historisches System geistiger Ordnung (1999) 0.01 
    0.011206072 = product of:
  0.03922125 = sum of:
    0.016856294 = weight(_text_:u in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016856294 = score(doc=2187,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.15348957 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
    0.022364957 = weight(_text_:i in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022364957 = score(doc=2187,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.17679983 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Enthält: Ernst Strouhal: ZETTEL, KASTEN, KATALOG Hans Petschar: EINIGE BEMERKUNGEN, DIE SORGFÄLTIGE VERFERTIGUNG EINES BIBLIOTHEKSKATALOGS FÜR DAS ALLGEMEINE LESEPUBLIKUM BETREFFEND Heimo Zobernig: VADEMEKUM: Zu den Regelwerken, eine Auswahl historischer Titel chronologisch gereiht DER NOMINALKATALOG DER ÖSTERREICHISCHEN NATIONALBIBLIOTHEK fotografiert von Octavian Trauttmansdorff - DOKUMENTATION Monika Hoxha, Monika Kiegler-Griensteidl, Hans Petschar - BLICK VON AUSSEN ÜBER DIE VERFERTIGUNG EINES NEUEN VERZEICHNISSES IN DER HOFBIBLIOTHEK (1780/81) Auszug aus: Friedrich Nicolai: Beschreibung einer Reise durch Deutschland und die Schweiz im Jahre 1781. ÜBER WISSENSCHAFTLICHE GEGENSTÄNDE. I. BIBLIOTHEKEN. A. ÖFFENTLICHE. I. HOFBIBLIOTHEKEN (1822) Auszug aus: Wien und dessen Umgebungen beschrieben vom königl. Bibliothekar Jäck zu Bamberg. HOFBIBLIOTHEK, K. K., IN WIEN (1838) Auszug aus: Österreichische National-Encyklopädie, oder alphabetische Darlegung der wissenswürdigsten Eigenthümlichkeiten des österreichischen Kaiserthumes (Vorzüglich der neueren und neuesten Zeit.) Im Geiste der Unbefangenheit bearbeitet. GENERAL STUMM DRINGT IN DIE STAATSBIBLIOTHEK EIN UND SAMMELT ERFAHRUNGEN ÜBER BIBLIOTHEKARE, BIBLIOTHEKSDIENER UND GEISTIGE ORDNUNG (1930) Auszug aus: Robert Musil: Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Nfd 50(1999) H.7, S.437-438 (U. Eich); nfd 51(2000) H.3, S.185-186 (U. Eich)
  14. Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007) 0.01 
    0.010061878 = product of:
  0.03521657 = sum of:
    0.01676642 = weight(_text_:p in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01676642 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
    0.018450148 = weight(_text_:i in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018450148 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
  15. López Guillamón, I.: Evolución reciente de la catalogación (2004) 0.01 
    0.009036807 = product of:
  0.06325765 = sum of:
    0.06325765 = weight(_text_:i in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06325765 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  16. Goossens, P.; Mazur-Rzesos, E.: Hierarchical relationships in bibliographic descriptions : problem analysis (1982) 0.01 
    0.008212124 = product of:
  0.057484865 = sum of:
    0.057484865 = weight(_text_:p in 4619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057484865 = score(doc=4619,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 4619, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4619)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  17. Hider, P.: ¬The bibliographic advantages of a centralised union catalogue for ILL and resource sharing (2003) 0.01 
    0.008212124 = product of:
  0.057484865 = sum of:
    0.057484865 = weight(_text_:p in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057484865 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  18. Crönert, M.; Dingler, U.: Online-Konversion als Auftragsprojekt vor Ort : Katalogkonversion in der BGR/NLfB-Bibliothek - ein Erfahrungsbericht (1999) 0.01 
    0.007946134 = product of:
  0.055622935 = sum of:
    0.055622935 = weight(_text_:u in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055622935 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  19. Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000) 0.01 
    0.0075434833 = product of:
  0.02640219 = sum of:
    0.018450148 = weight(_text_:i in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018450148 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
    0.007952043 = product of:
      0.015904086 = sum of:
        0.015904086 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015904086 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
    Issue
    Part I: National libraries, libraries around the world.
  20. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.01 
    0.007137234 = product of:
  0.024980318 = sum of:
    0.015892267 = weight(_text_:u in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015892267 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.00908805 = product of:
      0.0181761 = sum of:
        0.0181761 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0181761 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 55
  • d 35
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • m 9
  • el 5
  • s 5
  • b 3
  • r 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications