Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.05 
    0.04760075 = product of:
  0.16660261 = sum of:
    0.14430435 = weight(_text_:egghe in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14430435 = score(doc=76,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25592518 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.3661537 = idf(docFreq=75, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.5638537 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.3661537 = idf(docFreq=75, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.022298256 = weight(_text_:w in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022298256 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13240033 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
  2. Bredemeier, W.; Stock, W.G.: Informationskompetenz europäischer Volkswirtschaften (2000) 0.01 
    0.013843354 = product of:
  0.048451737 = sum of:
    0.020578917 = weight(_text_:u in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020578917 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113765314 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
    0.027872821 = weight(_text_:w in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027872821 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13240033 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  3. Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000) 0.01 
    0.009242012 = product of:
  0.032347042 = sum of:
    0.020578917 = weight(_text_:u in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020578917 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113765314 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
    0.011768126 = product of:
      0.023536252 = sum of:
        0.023536252 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023536252 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12166545 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034743395 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31
    Theme
    Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
  4. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.01 
    0.005379715 = product of:
  0.037658002 = sum of:
    0.037658002 = product of:
      0.075316004 = sum of:
        0.075316004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075316004 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12166545 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034743395 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  5. Stock, W.G.: Informationswirtschaft : Management externen Wissens (2000) 0.00 
    0.004778198 = product of:
  0.033447385 = sum of:
    0.033447385 = weight(_text_:w in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033447385 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13240033 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd 51(2000) H.8, S.496-497 (W. v. Hahn); ProLibris 6(2001) H.1, S.62 (R. Depping); B.I.I. online 4(2001) H.2, S.216-217 (D. Schmidmaier); Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 25(2001) H.1, S.114-115 (A. Halle)
  6. Bredemeier, W.; Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Branche elektronischer Geschäftsinformationen in Deutschland 2000/2001 (2001) 0.00 
    0.003981832 = product of:
  0.027872821 = sum of:
    0.027872821 = weight(_text_:w in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027872821 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13240033 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  7. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.00 
    0.0035278145 = product of:
  0.0246947 = sum of:
    0.0246947 = weight(_text_:u in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0246947 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113765314 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.0033623218 = product of:
  0.023536252 = sum of:
    0.023536252 = product of:
      0.047072504 = sum of:
        0.047072504 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047072504 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12166545 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034743395 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Heine, E.V.I.; Stock, W.G.; Oglou, Y.A.; Hackel, M.; Krasic, A.; Quack, S.; Rode, N.; Burghardt, S.; Manalodiparambil, M.; Röttger, M.; Schönhalz, D.; Valder, A.; Kühn, K.; Bachmaier, K.; Disli, S.; Punner, M.; Sabbagh, M.; Ströbele, U.; Bogen, C.; Rauter, J.; Schowe, K.; Steffen J.; Wiese, S.; Rohmen, S.; Wurzler, M.; Bülow, G.; Pudelko, F.; Roelvink, V.; Adjei-Kwarteng, C.; Jovanovic, M.; Kosmidou, M.; Hedwing, M.: Usability von Navigationssystemen im E-Commerce und bei informativen Websites - des Nutzers Odyssee (2003) 0.00 
    0.002351876 = product of:
  0.016463133 = sum of:
    0.016463133 = weight(_text_:u in 1966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016463133 = score(doc=1966,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.113765314 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034743395 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 1966, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1966)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  10. Stock, W.G.: Hochschulmanagement, Information Appliances, Fairness als Grundsatz : Information und Mobilität (2002) 0.00 
    0.0016811609 = product of:
  0.011768126 = sum of:
    0.011768126 = product of:
      0.023536252 = sum of:
        0.023536252 = weight(_text_:22 in 1364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023536252 = score(doc=1364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12166545 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034743395 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 19:39:36

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes