Search (10285 results, page 1 of 515)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.15
    0.14521852 = product of:
      0.21782778 = sum of:
        0.21251425 = product of:
          0.4250285 = sum of:
            0.16585027 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16585027 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3541173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.25917825 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25917825 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44267842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
        0.0053135264 = weight(_text_:a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053135264 = score(doc=692,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
    Type
    a
  2. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhurry, G.: Assessing the impact of user interaction with thesaural knowledge structures : a quantitative analysis framework (2003) 0.09
    0.09317487 = product of:
      0.1397623 = sum of:
        0.0069415616 = weight(_text_:a in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069415616 = score(doc=2766,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.13282074 = product of:
          0.26564148 = sum of:
            0.26564148 = weight(_text_:et.al in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26564148 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.42134178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.63046557 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri have been important information and knowledge organisation tools for more than three decades. The recent emergence and phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have yet been carried out to evaluate how end-users, for whom all these efforts are ostensibly made, interact with and make use of thesauri for query building and expansion. The present paper reports a pilot study carried out to determine the extent to which a thesaurus-enhanced search interface to a web-based database aided end-users in their selection of search terms. The study also investigated the ways in which users interacted with the thesaurus structure, terms, and interface. Thesaurusbased searching and browsing behaviours adopted by users while interacting with the thesaurus-enhanced search interface were also examined. 1. Introduction The last decade has witnessed the emergence of a broad range of applications for knowledge structures in general and thesauri in particular. A number of researchers have predicted that thesauri will increasingly be used in retrieval rather than for indexing (Milstead, 1998; Aitchison et al., 1997) and that their application in information retrieval systems will become more diverse due to the growth of fulltext databases accessed over the Internet (Williamson, 2000). Some researchers have emphasised the need for tailoring the structure and content of thesauri as tools for end-user searching (Bates, 1986; Strong and Drott, 1986; Anderson and Rowley, 1991; Lopez-Huertas, 1997) while others have suggested thesaurus-enhanced user interfaces to support query formulation and expansion (Pollitt et.al., 1994; Jones et.al., 1995; Beaulieu, 1997). The recent phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have been carried out to evaluate the ways in which end-users interact with and make use of online thesauri for query building and expansion. The work reported here expands an a pilot study (Shiri and Revie, 2001) carried out to investigate user - thesaurus interaction in the domains of biology and veterinary medicine.
    Type
    a
  3. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.08
    0.082010105 = sum of:
      0.06479456 = product of:
        0.25917825 = sum of:
          0.25917825 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25917825 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44267842 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041768912 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0030677656 = weight(_text_:a in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0030677656 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041768912 = queryNorm
          0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.014147777 = product of:
        0.028295554 = sum of:
          0.028295554 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028295554 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041768912 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
    Type
    a
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.07409505 = sum of:
      0.049755078 = product of:
        0.19902031 = sum of:
          0.19902031 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19902031 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3541173 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041768912 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0073626377 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0073626377 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041768912 = queryNorm
          0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.016977333 = product of:
        0.033954665 = sum of:
          0.033954665 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033954665 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041768912 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Type
    a
  5. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval (2004) 0.07
    0.06694112 = product of:
      0.100411676 = sum of:
        0.0064932364 = weight(_text_:a in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064932364 = score(doc=2643,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.13482209 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
        0.09391844 = product of:
          0.18783689 = sum of:
            0.18783689 = weight(_text_:et.al in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18783689 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42134178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.44580647 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Selection of search terms in an online search environment can be facilitated by the visual display of a knowledge map showing the various concepts and their links. This paper reports an a preliminary research aimed at designing a prototype knowledge map using DDC and its visual display. The prototype knowledge map created using the Protégé and TGViz freeware has been demonstrated, and further areas of research in this field are discussed.
    Content
    1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).
    Type
    a
  6. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 9th European conference, ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18 - 23, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.07
    0.06544618 = product of:
      0.09816927 = sum of:
        0.004250821 = weight(_text_:a in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004250821 = score(doc=2423,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
        0.09391844 = product of:
          0.18783689 = sum of:
            0.18783689 = weight(_text_:et.al in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18783689 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42134178 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.44580647 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, ECDL 2005, held in Vienna, Austria in September 2005. The 41 revised full papers presented together with 2 panel papers and 30 revised poster papers were carefully reviewed and selected from a total of 162 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on digital library models and architectures, multimedia and hypermedia digital libraries, XML, building digital libraries, user studies, digital preservation, metadata, digital libraries and e-learning, text classification in digital libraries, searching, and text digital libraries.
    Content
    Inhalt u.a.: - Digital Library Models and Architectures - Multimedia and Hypermedia Digital Libraries - XML - Building Digital Libraries - User Studies - Digital Preservation - Metadata - Digital Libraries and e-Learning - Text Classification in Digital Libraries - Searching - - Focused Crawling Using Latent Semantic Indexing - An Application for Vertical Search Engines / George Almpanidis, Constantine Kotropoulos, Ioannis Pitas - - Active Support for Query Formulation in Virtual Digital Libraries: A Case Study with DAFFODIL / Andre Schaefer, Matthias Jordan, Claus-Peter Klas, Norbert Fuhr - - Expression of Z39.50 Supported Search Capabilities by Applying Formal Descriptions / Michalis Sfakakis, Sarantos Kapidakis - Text Digital Libraries
    Editor
    Rauber, A. et.al.
  7. Diederichs, A.: Wissensmanagement ist Macht : Effektiv und kostenbewußt arbeiten im Informationszeitalter (2005) 0.05
    0.0519391 = product of:
      0.07790865 = sum of:
        0.013883123 = weight(_text_:a in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013883123 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
        0.06402553 = product of:
          0.12805106 = sum of:
            0.12805106 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12805106 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2005 9:16:22
    Type
    a
  8. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.05
    0.04922825 = product of:
      0.07384238 = sum of:
        0.00981685 = weight(_text_:a in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00981685 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.06402553 = product of:
          0.12805106 = sum of:
            0.12805106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12805106 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
    Type
    a
  9. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.05
    0.04922825 = product of:
      0.07384238 = sum of:
        0.00981685 = weight(_text_:a in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00981685 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
        0.06402553 = product of:
          0.12805106 = sum of:
            0.12805106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12805106 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
    Type
    a
  10. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05
    0.047499023 = product of:
      0.07124853 = sum of:
        0.066340104 = product of:
          0.26536041 = sum of:
            0.26536041 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26536041 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3541173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.004908425 = weight(_text_:a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004908425 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
    Type
    a
  11. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.04
    0.04442489 = product of:
      0.06663734 = sum of:
        0.058047596 = product of:
          0.23219039 = sum of:
            0.23219039 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23219039 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3541173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.008589744 = weight(_text_:a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008589744 = score(doc=306,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
    Type
    a
  12. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.04
    0.044115897 = product of:
      0.066173844 = sum of:
        0.0073626377 = weight(_text_:a in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073626377 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.058811206 = product of:
          0.11762241 = sum of:
            0.11762241 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11762241 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
    Type
    a
  13. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.04
    0.043074723 = product of:
      0.06461208 = sum of:
        0.008589744 = weight(_text_:a in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008589744 = score(doc=502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
        0.05602234 = product of:
          0.11204468 = sum of:
            0.11204468 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11204468 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
    Type
    a
  14. Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005) 0.04
    0.043074723 = product of:
      0.06461208 = sum of:
        0.008589744 = weight(_text_:a in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008589744 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.05602234 = product of:
          0.11204468 = sum of:
            0.11204468 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11204468 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:19:22
    Type
    a
  15. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04
    0.040111616 = product of:
      0.06016742 = sum of:
        0.049755078 = product of:
          0.19902031 = sum of:
            0.19902031 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19902031 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3541173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.010412342 = weight(_text_:a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010412342 = score(doc=2918,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Type
    a
  16. Adams, A.: Using the International Patent Classification in an online environment (2000) 0.04
    0.03943734 = product of:
      0.059156008 = sum of:
        0.013883123 = weight(_text_:a in 7380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013883123 = score(doc=7380,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 7380, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7380)
        0.045272887 = product of:
          0.09054577 = sum of:
            0.09054577 = weight(_text_:22 in 7380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09054577 = score(doc=7380,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7380, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    World patent information. 22(2000), S.291-300
    Type
    a
  17. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.04
    0.03943734 = product of:
      0.059156008 = sum of:
        0.013883123 = weight(_text_:a in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013883123 = score(doc=13,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
        0.045272887 = product of:
          0.09054577 = sum of:
            0.09054577 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09054577 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
    Type
    a
  18. Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002) 0.04
    0.03895433 = product of:
      0.05843149 = sum of:
        0.010412342 = weight(_text_:a in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010412342 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
        0.04801915 = product of:
          0.0960383 = sum of:
            0.0960383 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0960383 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:15:14
    Type
    a
  19. Christoffel, M.; Schmitt, B.: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game (2002) 0.04
    0.03895433 = product of:
      0.05843149 = sum of:
        0.010412342 = weight(_text_:a in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010412342 = score(doc=1361,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
        0.04801915 = product of:
          0.0960383 = sum of:
            0.0960383 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0960383 = score(doc=1361,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:19:01
    Type
    a
  20. Macskassy, S.A.; Hirsch, H.; Banerjee, A.; Dayanik, A A.: Converting numerical classification into text classification (2003) 0.04
    0.037862178 = product of:
      0.056793265 = sum of:
        0.017179487 = weight(_text_:a in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017179487 = score(doc=5915,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.048161518 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041768912 = queryNorm
            0.3567057 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
        0.039613776 = product of:
          0.07922755 = sum of:
            0.07922755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07922755 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14626761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041768912 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 9260
  • m 641
  • el 499
  • s 207
  • x 51
  • b 40
  • i 28
  • r 28
  • n 16
  • p 10
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications