Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fiala, D."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Subelj, L.; Fiala, D.: Publication boost in web of science journals and its effect on citation distributions (2017) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=3537,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3537, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3537)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  2. Fiala, D.: Current index : a proposal for a dynamic rating system for researchers (2014) 0.00
    0.0019808484 = product of:
      0.009904242 = sum of:
        0.009904242 = product of:
          0.019808484 = sum of:
            0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 1245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019808484 = score(doc=1245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An index is proposed that is based on the h-index and a 3-year publication/citation window. When updated regularly, it shows the current scientific performance of researchers rather than their lifetime achievement as indicated by common scientometric indicators. In this respect, the new rating scheme resembles established sports ratings such as in chess or tennis. By the example of ACM SIGMOD E.F. Codd Innovations Award winners and Priestley Medal recipients, we illustrate how the new rating can be represented by a single number and visualized.