Mally, A.K.; Stengel, F.: Zur Diskussion um den 202 der RSWK (1998)
0.03
0.030385906 = product of:
0.075964764 = sum of:
0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058986064 = score(doc=1227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
0.0169787 = product of:
0.0339574 = sum of:
0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339574 = score(doc=1227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Fortsetzung der Diskussion durch 2 österreichische Bibliothekare, die bislang von W. Unte u. F. Geißelmann bestritten wurde
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.6, S.1114