-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.03
0.025728894 = product of:
0.06432223 = sum of:
0.036212735 = product of:
0.07242547 = sum of:
0.07242547 = weight(_text_:l in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07242547 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.028109495 = product of:
0.05621899 = sum of:
0.05621899 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621899 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009)
0.02
0.022791084 = product of:
0.113955416 = sum of:
0.113955416 = sum of:
0.032015346 = weight(_text_:h in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032015346 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.08194007 = weight(_text_:l in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08194007 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.49683157 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Object
- h-index
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008)
0.02
0.021712217 = product of:
0.10856108 = sum of:
0.10856108 = sum of:
0.050620705 = weight(_text_:h in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050620705 = score(doc=695,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794038 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- An h-type index is proposed which depends on the obtained citations of articles belonging to the h-core. This weighted h-index, denoted as hw, is presented in a continuous setting and in a discrete one. It is shown that in a continuous setting the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the ideal may occur.
- Object
- h-index
-
Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017)
0.02
0.020488268 = product of:
0.05122067 = sum of:
0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029493032 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
0.02172764 = product of:
0.04345528 = sum of:
0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345528 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In this article we describe another problem with journal impact factors by showing that one journal's impact factor is dependent on other journals' publication delays. The proposed theoretical model predicts a monotonically decreasing function of the impact factor as a function of publication delay, on condition that the citation curve of the journal is monotone increasing during the publication window used in the calculation of the journal impact factor; otherwise, this function has a reversed U shape. Our findings based on simulations are verified by examining three journals in the information sciences: the Journal of Informetrics, Scientometrics, and the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012)
0.02
0.019843703 = product of:
0.09921851 = sum of:
0.09921851 = sum of:
0.048520677 = weight(_text_:h in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048520677 = score(doc=243,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050697833 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Based on earlier results about the shifted Lotka function, we prove an implicit functional relation between the Hirsch index (h-index) and the total number of sources (T). It is shown that the corresponding function, h(T), is concavely increasing. Next, we construct an implicit relation between the h-index and the impact factor IF (an average number of items per source). The corresponding function h(IF) is increasing and we show that if the parameter C in the numerator of the shifted Lotka function is high, then the relation between the h-index and the impact factor is almost linear.
- Object
- h-index
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.015437335 = product of:
0.038593337 = sum of:
0.02172764 = product of:
0.04345528 = sum of:
0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345528 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016865695 = product of:
0.03373139 = sum of:
0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373139 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.01
0.013493358 = product of:
0.06746679 = sum of:
0.06746679 = sum of:
0.024011508 = weight(_text_:h in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024011508 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345528 = score(doc=4994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Contrary to what one might expect, Nobel laureates and Fields medalists have a rather large fraction (10% or more) of uncited publications. This is the case for (in total) 75 examined researchers from the fields of mathematics (Fields medalists), physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine (Nobel laureates). We study several indicators for these researchers, including the h-index, total number of publications, average number of citations per publication, the number (and fraction) of uncited publications, and their interrelations. The most remarkable result is a positive correlation between the h-index and the number of uncited articles. We also present a Lotkaian model, which partially explains the empirically found regularities.
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008)
0.01
0.0071697556 = product of:
0.035848778 = sum of:
0.035848778 = product of:
0.071697555 = sum of:
0.071697555 = weight(_text_:l in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071697555 = score(doc=1965,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.4347276 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Harvey, L.; Rousseau, R.: Development of text-editing skill : from semantic and syntactic mappings to procedures (1995)
0.01
0.005794038 = product of:
0.02897019 = sum of:
0.02897019 = product of:
0.05794038 = sum of:
0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794038 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997)
0.01
0.005794038 = product of:
0.02897019 = sum of:
0.02897019 = product of:
0.05794038 = sum of:
0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794038 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A theoretical study of recall and precision using a topological approach to information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.005794038 = product of:
0.02897019 = sum of:
0.02897019 = product of:
0.05794038 = sum of:
0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794038 = score(doc=3267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000)
0.01
0.005794038 = product of:
0.02897019 = sum of:
0.02897019 = product of:
0.05794038 = sum of:
0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794038 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011)
0.01
0.005794038 = product of:
0.02897019 = sum of:
0.02897019 = product of:
0.05794038 = sum of:
0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05794038 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.0050697834 = product of:
0.025348917 = sum of:
0.025348917 = product of:
0.050697833 = sum of:
0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050697833 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Let (DS, DQ, sim) be a retrieval system consisting of a document space DS, a query space QS, and a function sim, expressing the similarity between a document and a query. Following D.M. Everett and S.C. Cater (1992), we introduce topologies on the document space. These topologies are generated by the similarity function sim and the query space QS. 3 topologies will be studied: the retrieval topology, the similarity topology and the (pseudo-)metric one. It is shown that the retrieval topology is the coarsest of the three, while the (pseudo-)metric is the strongest. These 3 topologies are generally different, reflecting distinct topological aspects of information retrieval. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for these topological aspects to be equal
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007)
0.01
0.0050697834 = product of:
0.025348917 = sum of:
0.025348917 = product of:
0.050697833 = sum of:
0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050697833 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.01
0.0050697834 = product of:
0.025348917 = sum of:
0.025348917 = product of:
0.050697833 = sum of:
0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050697833 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Rousseau, R.; Ye, F.Y.: ¬A proposal for a dynamic h-type index (2008)
0.01
0.0050620707 = product of:
0.025310352 = sum of:
0.025310352 = product of:
0.050620705 = sum of:
0.050620705 = weight(_text_:h in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050620705 = score(doc=2351,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- A time-dependent h-type indicator is proposed. This indicator depends on the size of the h-core, the number of citations received, and recent change in the value of the h-index. As such, it tries to combine in a dynamic way older information about the source (e.g., a scientist or research institute that is evaluated) with recent information.
- Object
- h-index
-
Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Simulating growth of the h-index (2009)
0.00
0.0048520677 = product of:
0.024260338 = sum of:
0.024260338 = product of:
0.048520677 = sum of:
0.048520677 = weight(_text_:h in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048520677 = score(doc=2717,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Temporal growth of the h-index in a diachronous cumulative time series is predicted to be linear by Hirsch (2005), whereas other models predict a concave increase. Actual data generally yield a linear growth or S-shaped growth. We study the h-index's growth in computer simulations of the publication-citation process. In most simulations the h-index grows linearly in time. Only occasionally does an S-shape occur, while in our simulations a concave increase is very rare. The latter is often signalled by the occurrence of plateaus - periods of h-index stagnation. Several parameters and their influence on the h-index's growth are determined and discussed.
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000)
0.00
0.0043455283 = product of:
0.02172764 = sum of:
0.02172764 = product of:
0.04345528 = sum of:
0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345528 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000)
0.00
0.0043455283 = product of:
0.02172764 = sum of:
0.02172764 = product of:
0.04345528 = sum of:
0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345528 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
