Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Schmidt, S.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in images : a study in emotional information retrieval (2009) 0.01
    0.008134521 = product of:
      0.0406726 = sum of:
        0.0406726 = product of:
          0.0813452 = sum of:
            0.0813452 = weight(_text_:lee in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0813452 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.32908607 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Some documents provoke emotions in people viewing them. Will it be possible to describe emotions consistently and use this information in retrieval systems? We tested collective (statistically aggregated) emotion indexing using images as examples. Considering psychological results, basic emotions are anger, disgust, fear, happiness, and sadness. This study follows an approach developed by Lee and Neal (2007) for music emotion retrieval and applies scroll bars for tagging basic emotions and their intensities. A sample comprising 763 persons tagged emotions caused by images (retrieved from www.Flickr.com) applying scroll bars and (linguistic) tags. Using SPSS, we performed descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. For more than half of the images, the test persons have clear emotion favorites. There are prototypical images for given emotions. The document-specific consistency of tagging using a scroll bar is, for some images, very high. Most of the (most commonly used) linguistic tags are on the basic level (in the sense of Rosch's basic level theory). The distributions of the linguistic tags in our examples follow an inverse power-law. Hence, it seems possible to apply collective image emotion tagging to image information systems and to present a new search option for basic emotions. This article is one of the first steps in the research area of emotional information retrieval (EmIR).
  2. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.00
    0.0028109495 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
  3. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: LexisNexis Recht und LexisNexis Wirtschaft : Informationsprodukte für den deutschen Markt (2005) 0.00
    0.0022638268 = product of:
      0.011319133 = sum of:
        0.011319133 = product of:
          0.022638267 = sum of:
            0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022638267 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Password. 2005, H.4, S.24-31
  4. Garfield, E.; Paris, S.W.; Stock, W.G.: HistCite(TM) : a software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage (2006) 0.00
    0.0019808484 = product of:
      0.009904242 = sum of:
        0.009904242 = product of:
          0.019808484 = sum of:
            0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019808484 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.391-400
  5. Stock, W.G.: Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung und ihr Einsatz bei Informationsdiensten für Nachrichten (2007) 0.00
    0.0019808484 = product of:
      0.009904242 = sum of:
        0.009904242 = product of:
          0.019808484 = sum of:
            0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019808484 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.1, S.41-46
  6. Weller, K.; Stock, W.G.: Transitive meronymy : automatic concept-based query expansion using weighted transitive part-whole relations (2008) 0.00
    0.0019808484 = product of:
      0.009904242 = sum of:
        0.009904242 = product of:
          0.019808484 = sum of:
            0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019808484 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.3, S.165-170
  7. Stock, W.G.; Stock, M.: Handbook of information science : a comprehensive handbook (2013) 0.00
    0.0014148918 = product of:
      0.007074459 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 65(2014) H.1, S.76-81 (R. Kuhlen). Weitere Rez. in: JASIST 67(2016) no.3, S.749-750 (T. Saracevic).
  8. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.00
    0.0011319134 = product of:
      0.0056595667 = sum of:
        0.0056595667 = product of:
          0.011319133 = sum of:
            0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011319133 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.385-389