Search (484 results, page 1 of 25)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.04
    0.043878466 = product of:
      0.07313077 = sum of:
        0.039324045 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039324045 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.011319133 = product of:
          0.022638267 = sum of:
            0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022638267 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022487596 = product of:
          0.04497519 = sum of:
            0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04497519 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  2. Fairthorne, R.A.: Bradford's law and perspective (1980) 0.04
    0.040976536 = product of:
      0.10244134 = sum of:
        0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058986064 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.04345528 = product of:
          0.08691056 = sum of:
            0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08691056 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  3. Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1997) 0.03
    0.034147117 = product of:
      0.08536779 = sum of:
        0.049155056 = weight(_text_:u in 1037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049155056 = score(doc=1037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 1037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1037)
        0.036212735 = product of:
          0.07242547 = sum of:
            0.07242547 = weight(_text_:l in 1037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07242547 = score(doc=1037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 1037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Peritz, B.C., L. Egghe u. W. Glanzel
  4. Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1998) 0.03
    0.034147117 = product of:
      0.08536779 = sum of:
        0.049155056 = weight(_text_:u in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049155056 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
        0.036212735 = product of:
          0.07242547 = sum of:
            0.07242547 = weight(_text_:l in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07242547 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Peritz, B.C., L. Egghe u. W. Glanzel
  5. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03
    0.033465866 = product of:
      0.08366466 = sum of:
        0.06951574 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06951574 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
        0.014148918 = product of:
          0.028297836 = sum of:
            0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028297836 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
  6. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.03
    0.03087467 = product of:
      0.077186674 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = product of:
          0.08691056 = sum of:
            0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08691056 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03373139 = product of:
          0.06746278 = sum of:
            0.06746278 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06746278 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  7. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.03
    0.030386224 = product of:
      0.07596556 = sum of:
        0.036212735 = product of:
          0.07242547 = sum of:
            0.07242547 = weight(_text_:l in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07242547 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.039752826 = product of:
          0.07950565 = sum of:
            0.07950565 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07950565 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  8. Rotto, E.; Morgan, R.P.: ¬An exploration of expert based text analysis techniques for assessing industrial relevance in US engineering dissertation abstracts (1997) 0.03
    0.027290687 = product of:
      0.13645343 = sum of:
        0.13645343 = weight(_text_:r.p in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13645343 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27057314 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.5043126 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Suraud, M.G.; Quoniam, L.; Rostaing, H.; Dou, H.: On the significance of data bases keywords for a large scale bibliometric investigation in fundamental physics (1995) 0.03
    0.026986716 = product of:
      0.13493358 = sum of:
        0.13493358 = sum of:
          0.048023015 = weight(_text_:h in 6094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048023015 = score(doc=6094,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 6094, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6094)
          0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 6094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08691056 = score(doc=6094,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 6094, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6094)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Engqvist, L.; Frommen, J.G.: New insights into the relationship between the h-index and self-citations? (2010) 0.03
    0.026986716 = product of:
      0.13493358 = sum of:
        0.13493358 = sum of:
          0.048023015 = weight(_text_:h in 3594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048023015 = score(doc=3594,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 3594, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3594)
          0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 3594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08691056 = score(doc=3594,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 3594, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3594)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index
  11. Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013) 0.03
    0.026986716 = product of:
      0.13493358 = sum of:
        0.13493358 = sum of:
          0.048023015 = weight(_text_:h in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048023015 = score(doc=683,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08691056 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index
  12. Bertoli-Barsotti, L.: Improving a decomposition of the h-index (2013) 0.03
    0.026986716 = product of:
      0.13493358 = sum of:
        0.13493358 = sum of:
          0.048023015 = weight(_text_:h in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048023015 = score(doc=976,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
          0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08691056 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index
  13. Nah, I.W.; Kang, D.-S.; Lee, D.-H.; Chung, Y.-C.: ¬A bibliometric evaluation of research performance in different subject categories (2009) 0.03
    0.026738355 = product of:
      0.06684589 = sum of:
        0.009904242 = product of:
          0.019808484 = sum of:
            0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019808484 = score(doc=2772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.056941643 = product of:
          0.11388329 = sum of:
            0.11388329 = weight(_text_:lee in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11388329 = score(doc=2772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4607205 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  14. Ye, F.Y.; Yu, S.S.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization (2013) 0.03
    0.025374835 = product of:
      0.06343709 = sum of:
        0.04170945 = weight(_text_:u in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04170945 = score(doc=1110,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), we analyze the mutual information among university, industry, and government addresses (U-I-G) at the country level for a number of countries. The dynamic evolution of the Triple Helix can thus be compared among developed and developing nations in terms of cross-sectional coauthorship relations. The results show that the Triple Helix interactions among the three subsystems U-I-G become less intensive over time, but unequally for different countries. We suggest that globalization erodes local Triple Helix relations and thus can be expected to have increased differentiation in national systems since the mid-1990s. This effect of globalization is more pronounced in developed countries than in developing ones. In the dynamic analysis, we focus on a more detailed comparison between China and the United States. Specifically, the Chinese Academy of the (Social) Sciences is changing increasingly from a public research institute to an academic one, and this has a measurable effect on China's position in the globalization.
  15. Kim, P.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.-H.: Developing a new collection-evaluation method : mapping and the user-side h-index (2009) 0.03
    0.025217602 = product of:
      0.063044004 = sum of:
        0.022371402 = product of:
          0.044742804 = sum of:
            0.044742804 = weight(_text_:h in 3171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044742804 = score(doc=3171,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4340154 = fieldWeight in 3171, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0406726 = product of:
          0.0813452 = sum of:
            0.0813452 = weight(_text_:lee in 3171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0813452 = score(doc=3171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.32908607 = fieldWeight in 3171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study proposes a new visualization method and index for collection evaluation. Specifically, it develops a network-based mapping technique and a user-focused Hirsch index (user-side h-index) given the lack of previous studies on collection evaluation methods that have used the h-index. A user-side h-index is developed and compared with previous indices (use factor, difference of percentages, collection-side h-index) that represent the strengths of the subject classes of a library collection. The mapping procedure includes the subject-usage profiling of 63 subject classes and collection-usage map generations through the pathfinder network algorithm. Cluster analyses are then conducted upon the pathfinder network to generate 5 large and 14 small clusters. The nodes represent the strengths of the subject-class usages reflected by the user-side h-index. The user-side h-index was found to have advantages (e.g., better demonstrating the real utility of each subject class) over the other indices. It also can more clearly distinguish the strengths between the subject classes than can collection-side h-index. These results may help to identify actual usage and strengths of subject classes in library collections through visualized maps. This may be a useful rationale for the establishment of the collection-development plan.
    Object
    h-index
  16. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.02
    0.024724657 = product of:
      0.06181164 = sum of:
        0.039324045 = weight(_text_:u in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039324045 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.022487596 = product of:
          0.04497519 = sum of:
            0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04497519 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
  17. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.02
    0.024173593 = product of:
      0.12086796 = sum of:
        0.12086796 = sum of:
          0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0339574 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
          0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08691056 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index
  18. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.02
    0.022791084 = product of:
      0.113955416 = sum of:
        0.113955416 = sum of:
          0.032015346 = weight(_text_:h in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032015346 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
          0.08194007 = weight(_text_:l in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08194007 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.49683157 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index
  19. Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007) 0.02
    0.021712217 = product of:
      0.10856108 = sum of:
        0.10856108 = sum of:
          0.050620705 = weight(_text_:h in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050620705 = score(doc=147,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
          0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05794038 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    When there are a group of articles and the present time is fixed we can determine the unique number h being the number of articles that received h or more citations while the other articles received a number of citations which is not larger than h. In this article, the time dependence of the h-index is determined. This is important to describe the expected career evolution of a scientist's work or of a journal's production in a fixed year.
  20. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007) 0.02
    0.021344937 = product of:
      0.10672469 = sum of:
        0.10672469 = sum of:
          0.056026854 = weight(_text_:h in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056026854 = score(doc=477,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.54347324 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
          0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050697833 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Jorge Hirsch recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.
    Object
    H-Index

Years

Types

  • a 472
  • m 7
  • el 5
  • s 5
  • r 1
  • More… Less…