Search (90 results, page 5 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.00
    0.00169787 = product of:
      0.00848935 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.3, S.131-140
  2. New Web Citation Index (2004) 0.00
    0.00169787 = product of:
      0.00848935 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.78, S.39 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.1]
  3. Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006) 0.00
    0.00169787 = product of:
      0.00848935 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.25-30 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
  4. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Abdeckung und Aktualität des Suchdienstes Google Scholar (2006) 0.00
    0.00169787 = product of:
      0.00848935 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 5131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=5131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.3, S.133-140
  5. Schneider, K.: Scopus contra ISI-WOS : Versuch einer vergleichenden Bewertung aus pharmakognostischer Sicht (2006) 0.00
    0.00169787 = product of:
      0.00848935 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.21-24 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
  6. Boyack, K.W.; Small, H.; Klavans, R.: Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text (2013) 0.00
    0.00169787 = product of:
      0.00848935 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. Stock, W.G.: Journal Citation Reports : Ein Impact Factor für Bibliotheken, Verlage und Autoren? (2001) 0.00
    0.0014148918 = product of:
      0.007074459 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Password. 2001, H.5, S.24-38
  8. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.00
    0.0014148918 = product of:
      0.007074459 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.21-30
  9. Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023) 0.00
    0.0014148918 = product of:
      0.007074459 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates scholars' citation behaviors from a fine-grained perspective. Specifically, each scholarly citation is considered multidimensional rather than logically unidimensional (i.e., present or absent). Thirty million articles from PubMed were accessed for use in empirical research, in which a total of 15 interpretable features of scholarly citations were constructed and grouped into three main categories. Each category corresponds to one aspect of the reasons and motivations behind scholars' citation decision-making during academic writing. Using about 500,000 pairs of actual and randomly generated scholarly citations, a series of Random Forest-based classification experiments were conducted to quantitatively evaluate the correlation between each constructed citation feature and citation decisions made by scholars. Our experimental results indicate that citation proximity is the category most relevant to scholars' citation decision-making, followed by citation authority and citation inertia. However, big-name scholars whose h-indexes rank among the top 1% exhibit a unique pattern of citation behaviors-their citation decision-making correlates most closely with citation inertia, with the correlation nearly three times as strong as that of their ordinary counterparts. Hopefully, the empirical findings presented in this paper can bring us closer to characterizing and understanding the complex process of generating scholarly citations in academia.
  10. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.00
    0.0011319134 = product of:
      0.0056595667 = sum of:
        0.0056595667 = product of:
          0.011319133 = sum of:
            0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011319133 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2003, Nr.77, S.34-36 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 56(2003) H.3/4]

Years

Languages

  • e 55
  • d 34
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • el 4
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications