Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.02
    0.022791084 = product of:
      0.113955416 = sum of:
        0.113955416 = sum of:
          0.032015346 = weight(_text_:h in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032015346 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
          0.08194007 = weight(_text_:l in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08194007 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.49683157 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index
  2. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.02
    0.020488268 = product of:
      0.05122067 = sum of:
        0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029493032 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we describe another problem with journal impact factors by showing that one journal's impact factor is dependent on other journals' publication delays. The proposed theoretical model predicts a monotonically decreasing function of the impact factor as a function of publication delay, on condition that the citation curve of the journal is monotone increasing during the publication window used in the calculation of the journal impact factor; otherwise, this function has a reversed U shape. Our findings based on simulations are verified by examining three journals in the information sciences: the Journal of Informetrics, Scientometrics, and the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.02
    0.019843703 = product of:
      0.09921851 = sum of:
        0.09921851 = sum of:
          0.048520677 = weight(_text_:h in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048520677 = score(doc=243,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050697833 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Based on earlier results about the shifted Lotka function, we prove an implicit functional relation between the Hirsch index (h-index) and the total number of sources (T). It is shown that the corresponding function, h(T), is concavely increasing. Next, we construct an implicit relation between the h-index and the impact factor IF (an average number of items per source). The corresponding function h(IF) is increasing and we show that if the parameter C in the numerator of the shifted Lotka function is high, then the relation between the h-index and the impact factor is almost linear.
    Object
    h-index
  4. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.02
    0.015437335 = product of:
      0.038593337 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  5. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.01
    0.013493358 = product of:
      0.06746679 = sum of:
        0.06746679 = sum of:
          0.024011508 = weight(_text_:h in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024011508 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
          0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04345528 = score(doc=4994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Contrary to what one might expect, Nobel laureates and Fields medalists have a rather large fraction (10% or more) of uncited publications. This is the case for (in total) 75 examined researchers from the fields of mathematics (Fields medalists), physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine (Nobel laureates). We study several indicators for these researchers, including the h-index, total number of publications, average number of citations per publication, the number (and fraction) of uncited publications, and their interrelations. The most remarkable result is a positive correlation between the h-index and the number of uncited articles. We also present a Lotkaian model, which partially explains the empirically found regularities.
  6. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.01
    0.0071697556 = product of:
      0.035848778 = sum of:
        0.035848778 = product of:
          0.071697555 = sum of:
            0.071697555 = weight(_text_:l in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071697555 = score(doc=1965,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4347276 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.01
    0.005794038 = product of:
      0.02897019 = sum of:
        0.02897019 = product of:
          0.05794038 = sum of:
            0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05794038 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  8. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.01
    0.005794038 = product of:
      0.02897019 = sum of:
        0.02897019 = product of:
          0.05794038 = sum of:
            0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05794038 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011) 0.01
    0.005794038 = product of:
      0.02897019 = sum of:
        0.02897019 = product of:
          0.05794038 = sum of:
            0.05794038 = weight(_text_:l in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05794038 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.01
    0.0050697834 = product of:
      0.025348917 = sum of:
        0.025348917 = product of:
          0.050697833 = sum of:
            0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050697833 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.01
    0.0050697834 = product of:
      0.025348917 = sum of:
        0.025348917 = product of:
          0.050697833 = sum of:
            0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050697833 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Rousseau, R.; Ye, F.Y.: ¬A proposal for a dynamic h-type index (2008) 0.01
    0.0050620707 = product of:
      0.025310352 = sum of:
        0.025310352 = product of:
          0.050620705 = sum of:
            0.050620705 = weight(_text_:h in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050620705 = score(doc=2351,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A time-dependent h-type indicator is proposed. This indicator depends on the size of the h-core, the number of citations received, and recent change in the value of the h-index. As such, it tries to combine in a dynamic way older information about the source (e.g., a scientist or research institute that is evaluated) with recent information.
    Object
    h-index
  13. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Yield sequences as journal attractivity indicators : "payback times" for Science and Nature (2008) 0.00
    0.0043455283 = product of:
      0.02172764 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  17. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals : taking similarity between subject fields into account (2016) 0.00
    0.0036212734 = product of:
      0.018106367 = sum of:
        0.018106367 = product of:
          0.036212735 = sum of:
            0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 2902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036212735 = score(doc=2902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 2902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  18. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    0.0036212734 = product of:
      0.018106367 = sum of:
        0.018106367 = product of:
          0.036212735 = sum of:
            0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036212735 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Rousseau, R.; Jin, B.: ¬The age-dependent h-type AR**2-index : basic properties and a case study (2008) 0.00
    0.00339574 = product of:
      0.0169787 = sum of:
        0.0169787 = product of:
          0.0339574 = sum of:
            0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0339574 = score(doc=2638,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.
    Object
    h-index
  20. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.00
    0.003373139 = product of:
      0.016865695 = sum of:
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24