Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × language_ss:"d"
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.05 
    0.052714508 = product of:
  0.08785751 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=402,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
    0.012005754 = product of:
      0.024011508 = sum of:
        0.024011508 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024011508 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  2. Gerdel, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Eisenhardt, O.; Ohly, P.: Quantitative Analyse und Suchstrategien (1981) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  6. Eisenhardt, O.H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  7. Henzler, R.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse (1980) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  8. Wersig, G.: Quantitative Methoden der Benutzerforschung (1981) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  9. Hunter, J.A.: Quantifizierbare Merkmale von Datenbanken (1981) 0.03 
    0.030385906 = product of:
  0.075964764 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  10. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.03 
    0.026772693 = product of:
  0.06693173 = sum of:
    0.055612598 = weight(_text_:u in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055612598 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.011319133 = product of:
      0.022638267 = sum of:
        0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022638267 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.77-85
  11. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.03 
    0.02576656 = product of:
  0.0644164 = sum of:
    0.050361652 = sum of:
      0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014148918 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036212735 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.014054747 = product of:
      0.028109495 = sum of:
        0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028109495 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
  12. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.03 
    0.025321592 = product of:
  0.06330398 = sum of:
    0.049155056 = weight(_text_:u in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049155056 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
    0.014148918 = product of:
      0.028297836 = sum of:
        0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028297836 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  13. Schmitz, J.; Arning, U.; Peters, I.: handbuch.io : Handbuch CoScience / Messung von wissenschaftlichem Impact (2015) 0.02 
    0.017725114 = product of:
  0.044312783 = sum of:
    0.03440854 = weight(_text_:u in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03440854 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
    0.009904242 = product of:
      0.019808484 = sum of:
        0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019808484 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Object
    h-Index
  14. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.02 
    0.015730564 = product of:
  0.039326407 = sum of:
    0.02246071 = product of:
      0.04492142 = sum of:
        0.04492142 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04492142 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  15. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.013522692 = product of:
  0.03380673 = sum of:
    0.011319133 = product of:
      0.022638267 = sum of:
        0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022638267 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.022487596 = product of:
      0.04497519 = sum of:
        0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04497519 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  16. Parthey, H.: Strukturwandel der bibliometrischen Profile wissenschaftlicher Institutionen im 20. Jahrhundert (2006) 0.01 
    0.012660796 = product of:
  0.03165199 = sum of:
    0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024577528 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
    0.007074459 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014148918 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
  17. Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013) 0.01 
    0.012086797 = product of:
  0.06043398 = sum of:
    0.06043398 = sum of:
      0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0169787 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
      0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04345528 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
  18. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01 
    0.0118323555 = product of:
  0.029580887 = sum of:
    0.009904242 = product of:
      0.019808484 = sum of:
        0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019808484 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.019676646 = product of:
      0.039353292 = sum of:
        0.039353292 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353292 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
  19. Herb, U.: Auch Pierre Bourdieu ist ein Indexierungsopfer (2017) 0.01 
    0.011797213 = product of:
  0.058986064 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  20. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01 
    0.01112252 = product of:
  0.055612598 = sum of:
    0.055612598 = weight(_text_:u in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055612598 = score(doc=5624,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 95
  • el 6
  • m 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications