Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007) 0.03 
    0.028379342 = product of:
  0.070948355 = sum of:
    0.014006713 = product of:
      0.028013427 = sum of:
        0.028013427 = weight(_text_:h in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013427 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.056941643 = product of:
      0.11388329 = sum of:
        0.11388329 = weight(_text_:lee in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11388329 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.4607205 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  2. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.02 
    0.023430059 = product of:
  0.058575146 = sum of:
    0.04170945 = weight(_text_:u in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04170945 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  3. Chung, Y.M.; Lee, J.Y.: Optimization of some factors affecting the performance of query expansion (2004) 0.02 
    0.022776658 = product of:
  0.11388329 = sum of:
    0.11388329 = product of:
      0.22776657 = sum of:
        0.22776657 = weight(_text_:lee in 2537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22776657 = score(doc=2537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.921441 = fieldWeight in 2537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2537)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Okada, M.; Ando, K.; Lee, S.S.; Hayashi, Y.; Aoe, J.I.: ¬An efficient substring search method by using delayed keyword extraction (2001) 0.02 
    0.01952285 = product of:
  0.09761424 = sum of:
    0.09761424 = product of:
      0.19522849 = sum of:
        0.19522849 = weight(_text_:lee in 6415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19522849 = score(doc=6415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.7898066 = fieldWeight in 6415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6415)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: Probabilistic information retrieval model for a dependence structured indexing system (2005) 0.02 
    0.016105529 = product of:
  0.08052764 = sum of:
    0.08052764 = product of:
      0.16105528 = sum of:
        0.16105528 = weight(_text_:lee in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16105528 = score(doc=1004,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.6515572 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003) 0.02 
    0.015452909 = product of:
  0.038632274 = sum of:
    0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024577528 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.014054747 = product of:
      0.028109495 = sum of:
        0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028109495 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:35:46
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.02 
    0.015452909 = product of:
  0.038632274 = sum of:
    0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024577528 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
    0.014054747 = product of:
      0.028109495 = sum of:
        0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028109495 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Chen, H.; Lally, A.M.; Zhu, B.; Chau, M.: HelpfulMed : Intelligent searching for medical information over the Internet (2003) 0.01 
    0.012660796 = product of:
  0.03165199 = sum of:
    0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024577528 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
    0.007074459 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014148918 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  9. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01 
    0.0118323555 = product of:
  0.029580887 = sum of:
    0.009904242 = product of:
      0.019808484 = sum of:
        0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019808484 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.019676646 = product of:
      0.039353292 = sum of:
        0.039353292 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353292 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
  10. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.01 
    0.010142018 = product of:
  0.025355045 = sum of:
    0.00848935 = product of:
      0.0169787 = sum of:
        0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0169787 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  11. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.01 
    0.007870658 = product of:
  0.039353292 = sum of:
    0.039353292 = product of:
      0.078706585 = sum of:
        0.078706585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078706585 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  12. Kulyukin, V.A.; Settle, A.: Ranked retrieval with semantic networks and vector spaces (2001) 0.01 
    0.00786481 = product of:
  0.039324045 = sum of:
    0.039324045 = weight(_text_:u in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039324045 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  13. Bhogal, J.; Macfarlane, A.; Smith, P.: ¬A review of ontology based query expansion (2007) 0.01 
    0.006881708 = product of:
  0.03440854 = sum of:
    0.03440854 = weight(_text_:u in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03440854 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Sakai, T.: On the reliability of information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance (2007) 0.01 
    0.0061455052 = product of:
  0.030727526 = sum of:
    0.030727526 = product of:
      0.061455052 = sum of:
        0.061455052 = weight(_text_:l in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061455052 = score(doc=910,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper compares 14 information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance, together with 10 traditional metrics based on binary relevance, in terms of stability, sensitivity and resemblance of system rankings. More specifically, we compare these metrics using the Buckley/Voorhees stability method, the Voorhees/Buckley swap method and Kendall's rank correlation, with three data sets comprising test collections and submitted runs from NTCIR. Our experiments show that (Average) Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain at document cut-off l are the best among the rank-based graded-relevance metrics, provided that l is large. On the other hand, if one requires a recall-based graded-relevance metric that is highly correlated with Average Precision, then Q-measure is the best choice. Moreover, these best graded-relevance metrics are at least as stable and sensitive as Average Precision, and are fairly robust to the choice of gain values.
  15. Zhao, L.; Wu, L.; Huang, X.: Using query expansion in graph-based approach for query-focused multi-document summarization (2009) 0.01 
    0.0061455052 = product of:
  0.030727526 = sum of:
    0.030727526 = product of:
      0.061455052 = sum of:
        0.061455052 = weight(_text_:l in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061455052 = score(doc=2449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Nie, J.-Y.: Query expansion and query translation as logical inference (2003) 0.01 
    0.0058986065 = product of:
  0.029493032 = sum of:
    0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029493032 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  17. Boughanem, M.; Chrisment, C.; Tamine, L.: On using genetic algorithms for multimodal relevance optimization in information retrieval (2002) 0.01 
    0.0050697834 = product of:
  0.025348917 = sum of:
    0.025348917 = product of:
      0.050697833 = sum of:
        0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050697833 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Losee, R.M.; Church Jr., L.: Are two document clusters better than one? : the cluster performance question for information retrieval (2005) 0.01 
    0.0050697834 = product of:
  0.025348917 = sum of:
    0.025348917 = product of:
      0.050697833 = sum of:
        0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050697833 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  19. Mandl, T.: Tolerantes Information Retrieval : Neuronale Netze zur Erhöhung der Adaptivität und Flexibilität bei der Informationssuche (2001) 0.01 
    0.005064318 = product of:
  0.012660795 = sum of:
    0.009831011 = weight(_text_:u in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009831011 = score(doc=5965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
    0.0028297834 = product of:
      0.0056595667 = sum of:
        0.0056595667 = weight(_text_:h in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056595667 = score(doc=5965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.05489909 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd - Information 54(2003) H.6, S.379-380 (U. Thiel): "Kannte G. Salton bei der Entwicklung des Vektorraummodells die kybernetisch orientierten Versuche mit assoziativen Speicherstrukturen? An diese und ähnliche Vermutungen, die ich vor einigen Jahren mit Reginald Ferber und anderen Kollegen diskutierte, erinnerte mich die Thematik des vorliegenden Buches. Immerhin lässt sich feststellen, dass die Vektorrepräsentation eine genial einfache Darstellung sowohl der im Information Retrieval (IR) als grundlegende Datenstruktur benutzten "inverted files" als auch der assoziativen Speichermatrizen darstellt, die sich im Laufe der Zeit Über Perzeptrons zu Neuronalen Netzen (NN) weiterentwickelten. Dieser formale Zusammenhang stimulierte in der Folge eine Reihe von Ansätzen, die Netzwerke im Retrieval zu verwenden, wobei sich, wie auch im vorliegenden Band, hybride Ansätze, die Methoden aus beiden Disziplinen kombinieren, als sehr geeignet erweisen. Aber der Reihe nach... Das Buch wurde vom Autor als Dissertation beim Fachbereich IV "Sprachen und Technik" der Universität Hildesheim eingereicht und resultiert aus einer Folge von Forschungsbeiträgen zu mehreren Projekten, an denen der Autor in der Zeit von 1995 bis 2000 an verschiedenen Standorten beteiligt war. Dies erklärt die ungewohnte Breite der Anwendungen, Szenarien und Domänen, in denen die Ergebnisse gewonnen wurden. So wird das in der Arbeit entwickelte COSIMIR Modell (COgnitive SIMilarity learning in Information Retrieval) nicht nur anhand der klassischen Cranfield-Kollektion evaluiert, sondern auch im WING-Projekt der Universität Regensburg im Faktenretrieval aus einer Werkstoffdatenbank eingesetzt. Weitere Versuche mit der als "Transformations-Netzwerk" bezeichneten Komponente, deren Aufgabe die Abbildung von Gewichtungsfunktionen zwischen zwei Termräumen ist, runden das Spektrum der Experimente ab. Aber nicht nur die vorgestellten Resultate sind vielfältig, auch der dem Leser angebotene "State-of-the-Art"-Überblick fasst in hoch informativer Breite Wesentliches aus den Gebieten IR und NN zusammen und beleuchtet die Schnittpunkte der beiden Bereiche. So werden neben den Grundlagen des Text- und Faktenretrieval die Ansätze zur Verbesserung der Adaptivität und zur Beherrschung von Heterogenität vorgestellt, während als Grundlagen Neuronaler Netze neben einer allgemeinen Einführung in die Grundbegriffe u.a. das Backpropagation-Modell, KohonenNetze und die Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) geschildert werden. Einweiteres Kapitel stellt die bisherigen NN-orientierten Ansätze im IR vor und rundet den Abriss der relevanten Forschungslandschaft ab. Als Vorbereitung der Präsentation des COSIMIR-Modells schiebt der Autor an dieser Stelle ein diskursives Kapitel zum Thema Heterogenität im IR ein, wodurch die Ziele und Grundannahmen der Arbeit noch einmal reflektiert werden. Als Dimensionen der Heterogenität werden der Objekttyp, die Qualität der Objekte und ihrer Erschließung und die Mehrsprachigkeit genannt. Wenn auch diese Systematik im Wesentlichen die Akzente auf Probleme aus den hier tangierten Projekten legt, und weniger eine umfassende Aufbereitung z.B. der Literatur zum Problem der Relevanz anstrebt, ist sie dennoch hilfreich zum Verständnis der in den nachfolgenden Kapitel oft nur implizit angesprochenen Designentscheidungen bei der Konzeption der entwickelten Prototypen. Der Ansatz, Heterogenität durch Transformationen zu behandeln, wird im speziellen Kontext der NN konkretisiert, wobei andere Möglichkeiten, die z.B. Instrumente der Logik und Probabilistik einzusetzen, nur kurz diskutiert werden. Eine weitergehende Analyse hätte wohl auch den Rahmen der Arbeit zu weit gespannt,
  20. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.01 
    0.005064318 = product of:
  0.012660795 = sum of:
    0.009831011 = weight(_text_:u in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009831011 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
    0.0028297834 = product of:
      0.0056595667 = sum of:
        0.0056595667 = weight(_text_:h in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056595667 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.05489909 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Editor
    Mandl, T. u. C. Womser-Hacker
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(2006) H.5, S.290-291 (C. Schindler): "Weniger als ein Jahr nach dem "Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop" (HIER 2005) im Juli 2005 ist der dazugehörige Tagungsband erschienen. Eingeladen hatte die Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft um ihre Forschungsergebnisse und die einiger externer Experten zum Thema Information Retrieval einem Fachpublikum zu präsentieren und zur Diskussion zu stellen. Unter dem Titel "Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis" sind nahezu sämtliche Beiträge des Workshops in dem nun erschienenen, 15 Beiträge umfassenden Band gesammelt. Mit dem Schwerpunkt Information Retrieval (IR) wird ein Teilgebiet der Informationswissenschaft vorgestellt, das schon immer im Zentrum informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung steht. Ob durch den Leistungsanstieg von Prozessoren und Speichermedien, durch die Verbreitung des Internet über nationale Grenzen hinweg oder durch den stetigen Anstieg der Wissensproduktion, festzuhalten ist, dass in einer zunehmend wechselseitig vernetzten Welt die Orientierung und das Auffinden von Dokumenten in großen Wissensbeständen zu einer zentralen Herausforderung geworden sind. Aktuelle Verfahrensweisen zu diesem Thema, dem Information Retrieval, präsentiert der neue Band anhand von praxisbezogenen Projekten und theoretischen Diskussionen. Das Kernthema Information Retrieval wird in dem Sammelband in die Bereiche Retrieval-Systeme, Digitale Bibliothek, Evaluierung und Multilinguale Systeme untergliedert. Die Artikel der einzelnen Sektionen sind insgesamt recht heterogen und bieten daher keine Überschneidungen inhaltlicher Art. Jedoch ist eine vollkommene thematische Abdeckung der unterschiedlichen Bereiche ebenfalls nicht gegeben, was bei der Präsentation von Forschungsergebnissen eines Institutes und seiner Kooperationspartner auch nur bedingt erwartet werden kann. So lässt sich sowohl in der Gliederung als auch in den einzelnen Beiträgen eine thematische Verdichtung erkennen, die das spezielle Profil und die Besonderheit der Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft im Feld des Information Retrieval wiedergibt. Teil davon ist die mehrsprachige und interdisziplinäre Ausrichtung, die die Schnittstellen zwischen Informationswissenschaft, Sprachwissenschaft und Informatik in ihrer praxisbezogenen und internationalen Forschung fokussiert.

Authors

Languages

  • e 44
  • d 13
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 53
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications