Search (97 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Berners-Lee, T.: ¬Das Web ist noch nicht vollendet (2000) 0.06
    0.06201718 = product of:
      0.15504295 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = product of:
          0.028297836 = sum of:
            0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028297836 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.14089403 = product of:
          0.28178805 = sum of:
            0.28178805 = weight(_text_:lee in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28178805 = score(doc=4250,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                1.1399876 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Tim Berners-Lee ist der Erfinder des WWW. Der Brite, der 1989 den ersten Browser entwickelt hat, schildert im Interview seine Vision von der Zukunft des Web
    Biographed
    Berners-Lee, T.
    Source
    Internet World. 2000, H.1, S.54-56
  2. Tochtermann, K.; Maurer, H.: Semantic Web : Geschichte und Ausblick einer Vision (2006) 0.03
    0.034715805 = product of:
      0.057859674 = sum of:
        0.019662023 = weight(_text_:u in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019662023 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
        0.0056595667 = product of:
          0.011319133 = sum of:
            0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011319133 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.032538082 = product of:
          0.065076165 = sum of:
            0.065076165 = weight(_text_:lee in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065076165 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26326886 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    "Stellen Sie sich folgendes Szenario vor. Frau Maler ist auf der Suche nach einem homöopathischen Arzt in ihrer Heimatstadt. Über ihre bevorzugte Suchmaschine gibt Frau Maler die Suchbegriffe Arzt, Homöopathie und Stadt Graz ein. Als Ergebnis wirft die Suchmaschine eine lange Liste an Links aus. Frau Maler sucht sich die Links aus, die direkt auf Ordinationen zeigen. Natürlich sind nun auch Ärzte in ihrer Liste, die sich nicht mit Homöopathie beschäftigen. Diese sortiert Frau Maler aus, genauso wie jene, die nicht mit den öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln des örtlichen Verbunds erreichbar sind. Dazu muss sie natürlich zum Teil zuvor im Stadtplan nach der genauen Lage der Adressen suchen. Schließlich sortiert sie die Ärzte aus, die keine Bewertungen besitzen bzw. die nicht zumindest als gut bewertet wurden. Für die verbleibenden Ärzte sichtet Frau Maler noch die Ordinationszeiten und vergleicht diese mit ihrem Kalender. Nach 20 Minuten hat Frau Maler schließlich drei in Frage kommende Ärzte gefunden. Ob sie welche übersehen hat, weiß sie freilich nicht." Geht das ganze nicht einfacher, schneller, besser? Und jetzt versetzen Sie sich ein paar Jahre in die Zukunft und stellen sich einen Projektmanager in einem transnationalen Konzern vor, der zusammen mit zwei weiteren Großkonzernen, fünfzehn kleineren Firmen sowie einem breiten Netzwerk selbständiger Spezialisten an einem bahnbrechenden Weltraumtourismusprojekt arbeitet. Ein unerwartetes Gerichtsurteil hat soeben die gesamten Rahmenbedingungen des Projekts gehörig ins Wanken gebracht. Und in der real time econony erwarten seine Projektpartner, Investoren und nicht zuletzt sein Chef schnelle und sichere Antworten - und das erfordert nicht nur Recherchen, die die Arztsuche von Frau Maler wie ein Kinderspiel aussehen lassen, sondern darüber hinaus auch noch enge virtuelle Zusammenarbeit über mehrere Zeitzonen und Fachdisziplinen hinweg ... muss das ganze nicht einfacher, schneller, besser gehen als heute? Die Antwort von Tim Berners-Lee, dem "Erfinder" des World Wide Web, und einer recht großen und beständig wachsenden Gruppe von Forschern, Technikern und zunehmend auch Anwendern lautet: Ja. Und wir wissen auch, wie. An dieser Stelle wird dann der Begriff des Semantic Web ins Spiel gebracht. Die grundlegende Idee besteht darin, Inhalte im Web so anzureichern, dass sie nicht nur für Menschen verständlich sind, sondern auch von Maschinen zumindest soweit erfasst werden können, dass Automatisierung auch auf der Ebene der Bedeutung möglich wird. Wie und wodurch das im Einzelnen geschieht, ist Gegenstand der Beiträge in diesem Band, die den Bogen von den prägenden Rahmenbedingungen - den Arbeitswelten in der Wissensgesellschaft - bis hin zu zukünftigen intelligenten Diensten - den Semantic Web Services - spannen.
    Source
    Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft. Hrsg.: T. Pellegrini, u. A. Blumauer
  3. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: Mein Computer versteht mich (2001) 0.03
    0.030558119 = product of:
      0.076395296 = sum of:
        0.011319133 = product of:
          0.022638267 = sum of:
            0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022638267 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.065076165 = product of:
          0.13015233 = sum of:
            0.13015233 = weight(_text_:lee in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13015233 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.5265377 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2001, H.8, S.42-49
  4. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.02
    0.024724657 = product of:
      0.06181164 = sum of:
        0.039324045 = weight(_text_:u in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039324045 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
        0.022487596 = product of:
          0.04497519 = sum of:
            0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04497519 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
    Editor
    Carroll, J.J. u. J. de Roo
  5. Feigenbaum, L.; Herman, I.; Hongsermeier, T.; Neumann, E.; Stephens, S.: ¬The Semantic Web in action (2007) 0.02
    0.024200356 = product of:
      0.06050089 = sum of:
        0.014485095 = product of:
          0.02897019 = sum of:
            0.02897019 = weight(_text_:l in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02897019 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.046015795 = product of:
          0.09203159 = sum of:
            0.09203159 = weight(_text_:lee in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09203159 = score(doc=3000,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.3723184 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Six years ago in this magazine, Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila unveiled a nascent vision of the Semantic Web: a highly interconnected network of data that could be easily accessed and understood by any desktop or handheld machine. They painted a future of intelligent software agents that would head out on the World Wide Web and automatically book flights and hotels for our trips, update our medical records and give us a single, customized answer to a particular question without our having to search for information or pore through results. They also presented the young technologies that would make this vision come true: a common language for representing data that could be understood by all kinds of software agents; ontologies--sets of statements--that translate information from disparate databases into common terms; and rules that allow software agents to reason about the information described in those terms. The data format, ontologies and reasoning software would operate like one big application on the World Wide Web, analyzing all the raw data stored in online databases as well as all the data about the text, images, video and communications the Web contained. Like the Web itself, the Semantic Web would grow in a grassroots fashion, only this time aided by working groups within the World Wide Web Consortium, which helps to advance the global medium. Since then skeptics have said the Semantic Web would be too difficult for people to understand or exploit. Not so. The enabling technologies have come of age. A vibrant community of early adopters has agreed on standards that have steadily made the Semantic Web practical to use. Large companies have major projects under way that will greatly improve the efficiencies of in-house operations and of scientific research. Other firms are using the Semantic Web to enhance business-to-business interactions and to build the hidden data-processing structures, or back ends, behind new consumer services. And like an iceberg, the tip of this large body of work is emerging in direct consumer applications, too.
    Content
    Vgl. auch unter: http://thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sciam/semantic-web-in-action#single-page.
  6. Antoniou, G.; Harmelen, F. van: ¬A semantic Web primer (2004) 0.02
    0.021697378 = product of:
      0.036162294 = sum of:
        0.012288764 = weight(_text_:u in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012288764 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.0904446 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
        0.0035372295 = product of:
          0.007074459 = sum of:
            0.007074459 = weight(_text_:h in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007074459 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0203363 = product of:
          0.0406726 = sum of:
            0.0406726 = weight(_text_:lee in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0406726 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16454303 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.8, S.1132-1133 (H. Che): "The World Wide Web has been the main source of an important shift in the way people communicate with each other, get information, and conduct business. However, most of the current Web content is only suitable for human consumption. The main obstacle to providing better quality of service is that the meaning of Web content is not machine-accessible. The "Semantic Web" is envisioned by Tim Berners-Lee as a logical extension to the current Web that enables explicit representations of term meaning. It aims to bring the Web to its full potential via the exploration of these machine-processable metadata. To fulfill this, it pros ides some meta languages like RDF, OWL, DAML+OIL, and SHOE for expressing knowledge that has clear, unambiguous meanings. The first steps in searing the Semantic Web into the current Web are successfully underway. In the forthcoming years, these efforts still remain highly focused in the research and development community. In the next phase, the Semantic Web will respond more intelligently to user queries. The first chapter gets started with an excellent introduction to the Semantic Web vision. At first, today's Web is introduced, and problems with some current applications like search engines are also covered. Subsequently, knowledge management. business-to-consumer electronic commerce, business-to-business electronic commerce, and personal agents are used as examples to show the potential requirements for the Semantic Web. Next comes the brief description of the underpinning technologies, including metadata, ontology, logic, and agent. The differences between the Semantic Web and Artificial Intelligence are also discussed in a later subsection. In section 1.4, the famous "laser-cake" diagram is given to show a layered view of the Semantic Web. From chapter 2, the book starts addressing some of the most important technologies for constructing the Semantic Web. In chapter 2, the authors discuss XML and its related technologies such as namespaces, XPath, and XSLT. XML is a simple, very flexible text format which is often used for the exchange of a wide variety of data on the Web and elsewhere. The W3C has defined various languages on top of XML, such as RDF. Although this chapter is very well planned and written, many details are not included because of the extensiveness of the XML technologies. Many other books on XML provide more comprehensive coverage.
    Theme
    Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
  7. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.02
    0.021634076 = product of:
      0.054085188 = sum of:
        0.03440854 = weight(_text_:u in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03440854 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.019676646 = product of:
          0.039353292 = sum of:
            0.039353292 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039353292 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009) 0.02
    0.021634076 = product of:
      0.054085188 = sum of:
        0.03440854 = weight(_text_:u in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03440854 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
        0.019676646 = product of:
          0.039353292 = sum of:
            0.039353292 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039353292 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  9. May, W.: Reasoning im und für das Semantic Web (2006) 0.02
    0.020257272 = product of:
      0.05064318 = sum of:
        0.039324045 = weight(_text_:u in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039324045 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
        0.011319133 = product of:
          0.022638267 = sum of:
            0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022638267 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dieses Kapitel gibt zuerst einen kurzen historischen Überblick über "Reasoning", d. h. Schließen, Wissensrepräsentation und "künstliche Intelligenz". Der Hauptteil geht auf einige "Reasoning"-Mechanismen und -Konzepte, die im Semantic Web eine Rolle spielen, ein und zeigt, wie dieses "Reasoning" - unauffällig - in den Konzepten des Semantic Web zur Beschreibung von Wissensbasen enthalten ist. Weiterhin werden Reasoning-Mechanismen umrissen, die dem Zusammenspiel verschiedener Knoten im Semantic Web dienen, und ein kurzes Fazit gezogen.
    Source
    Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft. Hrsg.: T. Pellegrini, u. A. Blumauer
  10. Weber, M.; Fröschl, K.: ¬Das Semantic Web als Innovation in der ökonomischen Koordination (2006) 0.02
    0.020079521 = product of:
      0.0501988 = sum of:
        0.04170945 = weight(_text_:u in 5789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04170945 = score(doc=5789,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 5789, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5789)
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 5789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=5789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Das Semantic Web stellt - dzt. noch weitgehend als Entwurf - das bislang letzte Glied einer langen Kette großtechnischer Kommunikationssysteme dar, dessen respektable Vorläufer u. A. die Telegrafie. die Telefonie, der Rundfunk und nicht zuletzt das Internet sind. Als technowissenschaftliche Ambition steht das Semantic Web in der gesellschaftlichen Tradition des abendländischen Aufklärungsprojekts der rationalen Bewirtschaftung von Raum, Zeit. Energie und Zeichen. Auf der Grundlage der sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten bereits weitgehend vollzogenen Medienkonvergenz in der digitalisierten Infrastruktur bildet das Semantic Web - zumindest konzeptiv - einen kongenialen` Gegenpart zur markant ansteigenden Vernetzung der sich globalisierenden Wertschöpfungssysteme, die ihre ökonomischen Potenziale in der fortschreitenden Arbeitsteilung (Spezialisierung) und, komplementär dazu, immer umfassenderen Prozessoptimierung nutzt, die sich beide wiederum in der Hauptsache auf konventionalisierte Bedeutungssysteme zur informationstechnischen - d. h. vor allem: algorithmischen - Koordination stützen. Die soziale Ausformung gerade der Kommunikations- (und Koordinations-) Technologien unterliegt entschieden dem Wechselspiel einzelwirtschaftlicher Akteure bzw. Kapitalverwertungsinteressen und gesamtgesellschaftlicher Technologieadoption, das folgerichtig die charakteristische Innovationsdynamik einschließlich der prävalenten Muster der Ressourcenallokation auch dieser spezifischen Technikgenese prägt.
    Source
    Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft. Hrsg.: T. Pellegrini, u. A. Blumauer
  11. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.: Publishing on the semantic Web (2001) 0.02
    0.01952285 = product of:
      0.09761424 = sum of:
        0.09761424 = product of:
          0.19522849 = sum of:
            0.19522849 = weight(_text_:lee in 3358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19522849 = score(doc=3358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.7898066 = fieldWeight in 3358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Spinning the Semantic Web : bringing the World Wide Web to its full potential (2003) 0.02
    0.018558085 = product of:
      0.046395212 = sum of:
        0.017924389 = product of:
          0.035848778 = sum of:
            0.035848778 = weight(_text_:l in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035848778 = score(doc=1981,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.2173638 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028470822 = product of:
          0.056941643 = sum of:
            0.056941643 = weight(_text_:lee in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056941643 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23036025 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Tim Bemers-Lee: The Original Dream - Re-enter Machines - Where Are We Now? - The World Wide Web Consortium - Where Is the Web Going Next? / Dieter Fensel, James Hendler, Henry Lieberman, and Wolfgang Wahlster: Why Is There a Need for the Semantic Web and What Will It Provide? - How the Semantic Web Will Be Possible / Jeff Heflin, James Hendler, and Sean Luke: SHOE: A Blueprint for the Semantic Web / Deborah L. McGuinness, Richard Fikes, Lynn Andrea Stein, and James Hendler: DAML-ONT: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web / Michel Klein, Jeen Broekstra, Dieter Fensel, Frank van Harmelen, and Ian Horrocks: Ontologies and Schema Languages on the Web / Borys Omelayenko, Monica Crubezy, Dieter Fensel, Richard Benjamins, Bob Wielinga, Enrico Motta, Mark Musen, and Ying Ding: UPML: The Language and Tool Support for Making the Semantic Web Alive / Deborah L. McGuinness: Ontologies Come of Age / Jeen Broekstra, Arjohn Kampman, and Frank van Harmelen: Sesame: An Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF Data and Schema Information / Rob Jasper and Mike Uschold: Enabling Task-Centered Knowledge Support through Semantic Markup / Yolanda Gil: Knowledge Mobility: Semantics for the Web as a White Knight for Knowledge-Based Systems / Sanjeev Thacker, Amit Sheth, and Shuchi Patel: Complex Relationships for the Semantic Web / Alexander Maedche, Steffen Staab, Nenad Stojanovic, Rudi Studer, and York Sure: SEmantic portAL: The SEAL Approach / Ora Lassila and Mark Adler: Semantic Gadgets: Ubiquitous Computing Meets the Semantic Web / Christopher Frye, Mike Plusch, and Henry Lieberman: Static and Dynamic Semantics of the Web / Masahiro Hori: Semantic Annotation for Web Content Adaptation / Austin Tate, Jeff Dalton, John Levine, and Alex Nixon: Task-Achieving Agents on the World Wide Web
  13. Daconta, M.C.; Oberst, L.J.; Smith, K.T.: ¬The Semantic Web : A guide to the future of XML, Web services and knowledge management (2003) 0.02
    0.017512752 = product of:
      0.08756376 = sum of:
        0.08756376 = sum of:
          0.065076165 = weight(_text_:lee in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065076165 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.26326886 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
          0.022487596 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022487596 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    "The Semantic Web is an extension of the current Web in which information is given well defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation." - Tim Berners Lee, "Scientific American", May 2001. This authoritative guide shows how the "Semantic Web" works technically and how businesses can utilize it to gain a competitive advantage. It explains what taxonomies and ontologies are as well as their importance in constructing the Semantic Web. The companion web site includes further updates as the framework develops and links to related sites.
    Date
    22. 5.2007 10:37:38
  14. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: ¬The Semantic Web : a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001) 0.02
    0.016269041 = product of:
      0.0813452 = sum of:
        0.0813452 = product of:
          0.1626904 = sum of:
            0.1626904 = weight(_text_:lee in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1626904 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.65817213 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Penin, T.; Fu, L.; Zhang, L.; Tran, T.; Yu, Y.; Pan, Y.: Semplore: a scalable IR approach to search the Web of Data (2009) 0.02
    0.01568675 = product of:
      0.07843375 = sum of:
        0.07843375 = sum of:
          0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0169787 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
          0.061455052 = weight(_text_:l in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061455052 = score(doc=1638,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.02
    0.015437335 = product of:
      0.038593337 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  17. Cazan, C.: Medizinische Ontologien : das Ende des MeSH (2006) 0.02
    0.015279059 = product of:
      0.038197648 = sum of:
        0.0056595667 = product of:
          0.011319133 = sum of:
            0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011319133 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.032538082 = product of:
          0.065076165 = sum of:
            0.065076165 = weight(_text_:lee in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065076165 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26326886 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Komplexizität medizinischer Fragestellungen und des medizinischen Informationsmanagements war seit den Anfängen der Informatik immer ein besonders wichtiges Thema. Trotz des Scheiterns der Künstlichen Intelligenz in den 80er Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts haben deren Kernideen Früchte getragen. Durch kongruente Entwicklung einer Reihe anderer Wissenschaftsdisziplinen und der exponentiellen Entwicklung im Bereich Computerhardware konnten die gestellten, hohen Anforderungen bei der medizinischen Informationssuche doch noch erfüllt werden. Die programmatische Forderung von Tim Berners-Lee betreffend "Semantic Web" im Jahr 2000 hat dem Thema Ontologien für maschinenlesbare Repositorien in Allgemein- und Fachsprache breitere Aufmerksamkeit gewonnen. Da in der Medizin (PubMed) mit dem von NLM schon vor 20 Jahren entwickelten Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) eine funktionierende Ontologie in Form eines semantischen Netzes in Betrieb ist, ist es auch für Medizinbibliothekare und Medizindokumentare hoch an der Zeit, sich damit zu beschäftigen. Ontologien können im Wesen, trotz der informatisch vernebelnden Terminologie, als Werkzeuge der Klassifikation verstanden werden. Hier sind von seiten der Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswissenschaft wesentliche Beiträge möglich. Der vorliegende Bericht bietet einen Einstieg in das Thema, erklärt wesentliche Elemente des UMLS und schließt mit einer kommentierten Anmerkungs- und Literaturliste für die weitere Beschäftigung mit Ontologien.
    Source
    GMS Med Bibl Inf. 6(2006) H.3, Doc31
  18. Stenzhorn, H.; Samwald, M.: ¬Das Semantic Web als Werkzeug in der biomedizinischen Forschung (2009) 0.02
    0.015192953 = product of:
      0.037982382 = sum of:
        0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029493032 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  19. Ulrich, W.: Simple Knowledge Organisation System (2007) 0.01
    0.011797213 = product of:
      0.058986064 = sum of:
        0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058986064 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    http://cs.uni-muenster.de/u/lammers/EDU/ss07/AgentenSemanticWeb/Abgaben/Ulrich%20Wolfgang%20-%20Vortrag%20-%20SKOS.pdf
  20. Brake, M.: ¬Das Semantische Web : Eine Vision in der Halbzeit (2005) 0.01
    0.011388329 = product of:
      0.056941643 = sum of:
        0.056941643 = product of:
          0.11388329 = sum of:
            0.11388329 = weight(_text_:lee in 4764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11388329 = score(doc=4764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4607205 = fieldWeight in 4764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Mit der Veröffentlichung der ersten Website 1989 am CERN gab Timothy J. Berners-Lee den Startschuss für das WorldWideWeb, diesem ständig expandierenden Konvolut aus digitalisierten Daten, vernetzten Maschinen und Menschen. Mittlerweile nimmt das Netz für sich in Anspruch, das Weltwissen zu repräsentieren und hat in seiner Gesamtheit längst die klassische Vorstellung von einer Enzyklopädie abgelöst und übertroffen. Andererseits ist das Netz trotz geballter Wissensansammlung und Rechenpower immer noch dumm. Seit fast einer Dekade ist nun das "verständige" Internet in der Diskussion, die Semantic Web Days in München und die Semantics in Wien zogen eine Zwischenbilanz und zeigten ein mittlerweile weites Spektrum von Praxisanwendungen.

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 40

Types

  • a 60
  • el 29
  • m 11
  • s 7
  • n 6
  • r 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications