Search (145 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Konstruktivismus und Ethik : Delfin 1995 (1996) 0.06 
    0.06227244 = product of:
  0.1556811 = sum of:
    0.08845319 = weight(_text_:g in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08845319 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
    0.06722792 = weight(_text_:u in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06722792 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Editor
    Rusch, G. u. S.J. Schmidt
  2. Information society : new media, ethics and postmodernism (1996) 0.04 
    0.03964402 = product of:
  0.066073366 = sum of:
    0.025272338 = weight(_text_:g in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025272338 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.165991 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
    0.033269197 = weight(_text_:u in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033269197 = score(doc=2451,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.25064746 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
    0.0075318282 = weight(_text_:a in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075318282 = score(doc=2451,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This volume examines 3 critical debates of the post-industrial society: culture and technology, information society, and postmodernism. It aims to provide theoretical and methodological underpinnings for the analysis and design of information, communication and multimedia technologies. It is a thoroughly interdisciplinara volume, which will be of interest to students, researchers and practitioners in a wide area of disciplines including information and communication systems, education and social sciences
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: COOLEY, M.: Visions and problems of the post-industrial society; GILL, K.S.: Knowledge and the post-industrial society; LYTJE, I.: Media and the cultural condition: language and education; WHISTON, T.: Knowledge and sustainable development: towards the furtherance of a global communication system; SHIPLEY, P.: The keyboard blues: modern technology and the rights and risks of people at work; LEAL, F.: Ethics is fragile, goodness is not; HIROSE, L.M.: Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics; THORPE, J.: Information system design: human centres approaches; BESSELAAR, P. van den u. T. MOM: Technological change, social innovation and employment; JONES, M.: Empowerment and enslavement: business process reeingineering and the transformation of work; LEVY, P.: The role of creativity in post-industrial society: exploring the implications of non-conventional technologies for work and management organisation; JANSEN, A.: The global information society and rural economics; DAY, P.: Information communication technology and society: a community-based approach; CYSNE, F.P.: Technology transfer and development; COOPER, J.: Information, knowledge and empowerment: the role of information in rural development; CLAY, J.: Participative citizenry in the information ages: the role of science and technology towards democratic education in a multicultural society; TAYLOR, J.: New media and cultural representation; BLACK, M.T.: Consensus and authenticity in representations: simulation as participative theatre; GORAYSKA, B. u. J.L. MEY: Cognitive technology; BOYNE, C.W.: Electronic mail, IT productivity and workplace culture; Squires, P.: Deadly technology in the post-industrial society: a case study of firearms and firearms control; COLE, M. u. D. HILL: Resitance postmodernism: emancipatory politics for a new era or academic chic for a defeatist intelligentsia?; McFEE, G.: Postmodernism, dance and post-industrial society; MULLER, R.C.: Creativity constellation for innovation and cooperation
  3. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.03 
    0.034202598 = product of:
  0.057004325 = sum of:
    0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03361396 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
    0.004168103 = weight(_text_:a in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004168103 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
    0.019222261 = product of:
      0.038444523 = sum of:
        0.038444523 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038444523 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  4. Informationsethik (1995) 0.02 
    0.02243673 = product of:
  0.056091826 = sum of:
    0.0499038 = weight(_text_:u in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0499038 = score(doc=2455,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.3759712 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
    0.0061880285 = weight(_text_:a in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061880285 = score(doc=2455,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge u. Kapitel: HENRICHS, N.: Menschsein im Informationszeitalter; WIEGERLING, K.: Medium und Verhalten; BOUGNOUX, D.: Qui a peur de l'information?; CAPURRO, R.: Moral issues in information science; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethical considerations in technology transfer; DOCTOR, R.D.: Information technologies and social equity: confronting the revolution; BARBES, R.F.: Ethical and legal issues raised by information technology: the professional producer-product mix; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethics, ideologies, and practices of information technology and systems; Du MONT, R.R.: Ethics in librarianship: a management model; HAUPTMANN, R.: Ethical concerns in librarianship: an overview; SWAN, J.: Ethics inside and out: the case of Guidoriccio; SMITH, M.M.: Infoethics for leaders: models of moral agency in the information environment; KOSTREWSKI, B.J. u. C. OPPENHEIM: Ethics in information science; FROHMANN, B.: Knowledge and power in information science: a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint 'Ein- u. weiterführende Bibliographie'; 'Ethik-Kodizes'
  5. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.02 
    0.021372763 = product of:
  0.053431906 = sum of:
    0.04753732 = weight(_text_:u in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04753732 = score(doc=1698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.35814235 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
    0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058945883 = score(doc=1698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  6. Cornish, G.: ¬The ethics of information (1997) 0.02 
    0.020578384 = product of:
  0.05144596 = sum of:
    0.044226594 = weight(_text_:g in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044226594 = score(doc=84,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
    0.0072193667 = weight(_text_:a in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072193667 = score(doc=84,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Reports on 'Info-Ethics', the 1st International Congress on Ethical, Legal and Societal Aspects of Digital Information' held at Monte Carlo in MAr 1997. Some 200 delegates from many countries attended: topics covered included the Internet and its control, and the problems of access to it for developing countries with inadequate telecommunications infrastructure. 2 main themes of the conference were the problems of multilingual information provision, and preservation and conservation in the digital environment. Discussions on the nature of ethics and the ethics of cyberspace led to consideration of whether a 'right to communicate' should be added to the International Convention on Human Rights: there may also be pressure for Unesco to establish a Commission on information ethics
    Type
    a
  7. Rockembach, M.; Malheiro da Silva, A.: Epistemology and ethics of big data (2018) 0.02 
    0.018061051 = product of:
  0.045152627 = sum of:
    0.038415954 = weight(_text_:u in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038415954 = score(doc=4848,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
    0.006736672 = weight(_text_:a in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006736672 = score(doc=4848,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  8. Chaves Guimarães, J.A. et al: ¬Los valores éticos en organización y representación del conocimiento (ORC) (2007) 0.02 
    0.0172718 = product of:
  0.0431795 = sum of:
    0.038415954 = weight(_text_:u in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038415954 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
    0.0047635464 = weight(_text_:a in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047635464 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
    Type
    a
  9. Helbing, D.; Frey, B.S.; Gigerenzer, G.; Hafen, E.; Hagner, M.; Hofstetter, Y.; Hoven, J. van den; Zicari, R.V.; Zwitter, A.: Digitale Demokratie statt Datendiktatur : Digital-Manifest (2016) 0.02 
    0.017184405 = product of:
  0.04296101 = sum of:
    0.037908506 = weight(_text_:g in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037908506 = score(doc=5600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
    0.0050525037 = weight(_text_:a in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050525037 = score(doc=5600,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  10. Rötzer, F.: Brauchen Roboter eine Ethik und handeln Menschen moralisch? (2017) 0.01 
    0.013827056 = product of:
  0.03456764 = sum of:
    0.031590424 = weight(_text_:g in 5243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031590424 = score(doc=5243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 5243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5243)
    0.0029772164 = weight(_text_:a in 5243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029772164 = score(doc=5243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 5243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5243)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Mit Verweis auf den Bericht der Ethik-Kommission unter: http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Publikationen/G/bericht-der-ethik-kommission.html.
    Type
    a
  11. Ethics and reference services (1982) 0.01 
    0.013445585 = product of:
  0.06722792 = sum of:
    0.06722792 = weight(_text_:u in 7864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06722792 = score(doc=7864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 7864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7864)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Editor
    Katz, B. u. R.A. Fraley
  12. Dane, F.C.: ¬The importance of the sources of professional obligations (2014) 0.01 
    0.012521054 = product of:
  0.031302635 = sum of:
    0.024009973 = weight(_text_:u in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024009973 = score(doc=3367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
    0.0072926614 = weight(_text_:a in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072926614 = score(doc=3367,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The study of philosophy provides many general benefits to members of any field or discipline, the easiest of which to defend are an appreciation of, and experience with, critical thinking, including the ability to apply principles thoughtfully and logically in a variety of contexts; it is the discipline that, according to Plato, Socrates believed made life worth living. Today, however, most disciplines can lay claim to critical thinking - information science certainly involves a great deal of logical analysis - but only philosophy, in the Western world, can lay claim to having developed logic and critical thinking and thereby may have furthered the process more than any other discipline. Historically, philosophy is also the discipline in which one learns how to think about the most complex and important questions including questions about what is right and proper; that is, philosophy arguably lays claim to the development of ethics. Before going further, I should note that I am neither a philosopher nor an information scientist. I am a social psychologist and statistician whose interests have brought me into the realm of practical ethics primarily through ethical issues relevant to empirical research. I should also note that I am firmly in the camp of those who consider there to be an important distinction between morals and ethics; as do others, I argue that moral judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not rules, defined broadly, are followed, whereas ethical judgements essentially involve questions about whether or not a particular rule is worthwhile and, when there are incompatible rules, which rule should be granted higher priority.
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
    Type
    a
  13. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.011666666 = product of:
  0.029166663 = sum of:
    0.024009973 = weight(_text_:u in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024009973 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
    0.0051566907 = weight(_text_:a in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051566907 = score(doc=1696,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  14. Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.011666666 = product of:
  0.029166663 = sum of:
    0.024009973 = weight(_text_:u in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024009973 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
    0.0051566907 = weight(_text_:a in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051566907 = score(doc=1699,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In the past, many professions and scientific disciplines decided to create a code of ethics which shall guide the professional activities of their members. The rules in these codes of ethics, sometimes called ethical guidelines, shall provide guidance in situations of moral conflict. Obviously, as other professionals or scholars, persons who are involved in knowledge organization face moral conflicts, too. Therefore, ISKO decided to discuss whether it would be necessary to create ethical guidelines for ISKO. In the paper two options to formulate a code of ethics are discussed: First, it is possible to identify moral values without formulating the way they can be achieved - this option is realised in the ethical guidelines of the German Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Second, it is feasible to clearly define morally acceptable professional actions without formulation basic moral values - this option is realised in the ACM and IEEE-CS Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. It is argued that if ISKO should decide to implement an own code of ethics it will be inevitable to choose the second option while it also will be necessary to address the specific needs of knowledge organization and its moral problems, for instance, the conflict of copyright and open access. Additionally, the second option has to be completed by basic moral values that shall underlie the professional actions of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  15. Ethics, information and technology : readings (1998) 0.01 
    0.011524786 = product of:
  0.05762393 = sum of:
    0.05762393 = weight(_text_:u in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05762393 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Editor
    Stichler, R.N. u. R. Hauptman
  16. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01 
    0.011481988 = product of:
  0.02870497 = sum of:
    0.006736672 = weight(_text_:a in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006736672 = score(doc=2833,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
    0.021968298 = product of:
      0.043936595 = sum of:
        0.043936595 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043936595 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
    Type
    a
  17. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01 
    0.011481988 = product of:
  0.02870497 = sum of:
    0.006736672 = weight(_text_:a in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006736672 = score(doc=248,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
    0.021968298 = product of:
      0.043936595 = sum of:
        0.043936595 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043936595 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Having reached the US Supreme Court in 1997, the Communications Decency Act (1996) has strong implications for Internet service providers. How to protect children while not denying adult rights of access is an issue which has impacted successively upon motion pictures, reading materials, radio, television and cable. The case for freedom of electronic speech appears compelling. The problems of obscenity, encryption (cryptography) and provocative 'cyberspeech' on the Internet offers a field day for litigation
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
    Type
    a
  18. Rösch, H.: Informationsethik (2023) 0.01 
    0.011288158 = product of:
  0.028220393 = sum of:
    0.024009973 = weight(_text_:u in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024009973 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
    0.00421042 = weight(_text_:a in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00421042 = score(doc=821,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Der Terminus Informationsethik (information ethics) wurde Ende der 1980er Jahre im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geprägt und tauchte etwa zeitgleich in den USA und Deutschland auf. Informationsethik umfasst alle ethisch relevanten Fragen, die im Zusammenhang mit Produktion, Speicherung, Erschließung, Verteilung und Nutzung von Informationen auftreten. Informationsethik gehört zu den angewandten oder Bereichsethiken, die sich in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten in großer Zahl gebildet haben. Dazu zählen etwa Wirtschaftsethik, Medizinethik, Technikethik, Computerethik oder Medienethik. Zu beobachten ist ein Trend zu immer spezifischeren Bereichsethiken wie z. B. der Lebensmittelethik oder der Algorithmenethik. Aufteilung und Abgrenzung der Bereichsethiken folgen keinem einheitlichen Prinzip. Daher schwanken ihre Anzahl und ihre Benennungen in der Fachliteratur erheblich. Bereichsethiken überlappen sich z. T. oder stehen bisweilen in einem komplementären Verhältnis. So hat die Informationsethik ohne Zweifel u. a. Bezüge zur Medienethik, zur Technikethik (Computerethik), zur Wirtschaftsethik, zur Wissenschaftsethik und natürlich zur Sozialethik. Im Unterschied zur Allgemeinen Ethik, die sich mit übergreifenden, allgemeinen Aspekten wie Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit oder Wahrhaftigkeit auseinandersetzt, übertragen angewandte Ethiken zum einen allgemeine ethische Prinzipien und Methoden auf bestimmte Lebensbereiche und Handlungsfelder. Zum anderen arbeiten sie spezifische Fragestellungen und Probleme heraus, die charakteristisch für den jeweiligen Bereich sind und die in der Allgemeinen Ethik keine Berücksichtigung finden. Angewandte Ethiken sind grundsätzlich praxisorientiert. Sie zielen darauf, die Akteure der jeweiligen Handlungsfelder für ethische Fragestellungen zu sensibilisieren und das Bewusstsein um eine gemeinsame Wertebasis, die idealerweise in einem Ethikkodex dokumentiert ist, zu stabilisieren.
    Type
    a
  19. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.01 
    0.010692738 = product of:
  0.026731845 = sum of:
    0.0047635464 = weight(_text_:a in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047635464 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
    0.021968298 = product of:
      0.043936595 = sum of:
        0.043936595 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043936595 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
    Type
    a
  20. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.01 
    0.010692738 = product of:
  0.026731845 = sum of:
    0.0047635464 = weight(_text_:a in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047635464 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040536046 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
    0.021968298 = product of:
      0.043936595 = sum of:
        0.043936595 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043936595 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 103
  • d 40
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 131
  • m 9
  • s 9
  • el 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications