Search (110 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.08
    0.08480187 = product of:
      0.14133644 = sum of:
        0.08845319 = weight(_text_:g in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08845319 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
        0.014438733 = weight(_text_:a in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014438733 = score(doc=4506,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
        0.038444523 = product of:
          0.076889046 = sum of:
            0.076889046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076889046 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 28(1991) no.4, S.125-130
    Type
    a
  2. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.06
    0.056132857 = product of:
      0.09355476 = sum of:
        0.044675604 = weight(_text_:g in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044675604 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
        0.041586496 = weight(_text_:u in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041586496 = score(doc=6050,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
        0.0072926614 = weight(_text_:a in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072926614 = score(doc=6050,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  3. Bhattacharyya, G.: ¬A general theory of subject headings (1974) 0.05
    0.047036305 = product of:
      0.11759076 = sum of:
        0.10108935 = weight(_text_:g in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10108935 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.663964 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
        0.01650141 = weight(_text_:a in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01650141 = score(doc=1592,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3530471 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 11(1974), S.23-29
    Type
    a
  4. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.04
    0.036703456 = product of:
      0.061172426 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.008336206 = weight(_text_:a in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008336206 = score(doc=1149,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.019222261 = product of:
          0.038444523 = sum of:
            0.038444523 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038444523 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
    Type
    a
  5. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.03
    0.034202598 = product of:
      0.057004325 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.004168103 = weight(_text_:a in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004168103 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.019222261 = product of:
          0.038444523 = sum of:
            0.038444523 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038444523 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  6. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.03
    0.026888918 = product of:
      0.044814862 = sum of:
        0.022113297 = weight(_text_:g in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022113297 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.01680698 = weight(_text_:u in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01680698 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058945883 = score(doc=1800,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Francu, V.: ¬A linguistic approach to information languages (2003) 0.02
    0.022576315 = product of:
      0.056440786 = sum of:
        0.048019946 = weight(_text_:u in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048019946 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
        0.00842084 = weight(_text_:a in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00842084 = score(doc=3538,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
    Type
    a
  8. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.02
    0.021589752 = product of:
      0.05397438 = sum of:
        0.048019946 = weight(_text_:u in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048019946 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
        0.0059544328 = weight(_text_:a in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059544328 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. Eds.: D. Hymes u. W.E. Bittle
    Type
    a
  9. Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002) 0.02
    0.01877372 = product of:
      0.0469343 = sum of:
        0.04074627 = weight(_text_:u in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04074627 = score(doc=1201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
        0.0061880285 = weight(_text_:a in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061880285 = score(doc=1201,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Thesaural relations have long been used in information retrieval to enrich queries; they have sometimes been used to cluster documents as well. Sometimes the first query to an information retrieval system yields no results at all, or, what can be even more disconcerting, many thousands of hits. One solution is to rephrase the query, improving the choice of query terms by using related terms of different types. A collection of related terms is often called a thesaurus. This chapter describes the lexical-semantic relations that have been used in building thesauri and summarizes some of the effects of using these relational thesauri in information retrieval experiments
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  10. Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.02
    0.018318767 = product of:
      0.045796916 = sum of:
        0.041586496 = weight(_text_:u in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041586496 = score(doc=1139,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
        0.00421042 = weight(_text_:a in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00421042 = score(doc=1139,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
    Editor
    Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  11. Bodenreider, O.; Bean, C.A.: Relationships among knowledge structures : vocabulary integration within a subject domain (2001) 0.02
    0.018061051 = product of:
      0.045152627 = sum of:
        0.038415954 = weight(_text_:u in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038415954 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
        0.006736672 = weight(_text_:a in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006736672 = score(doc=1145,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
    Type
    a
  12. Salton, G.: Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction for information retrieval (1972) 0.02
    0.017690638 = product of:
      0.08845319 = sum of:
        0.08845319 = weight(_text_:g in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08845319 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  13. ¬The LCSH century : One hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000) 0.02
    0.017496703 = product of:
      0.04374176 = sum of:
        0.038415954 = weight(_text_:u in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038415954 = score(doc=1224,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
        0.005325807 = weight(_text_:a in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005325807 = score(doc=1224,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: BACKGROUND: Alva T STONE: The LCSH Century: A Brief History of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and Introduction to the Centennial Essays - THEORY AND PRINCIPLES: Elaine SVENONIUS: LCSH: Semantics, Syntax and Specificity; Heidi Lee HOERMAN u. Kevin A. FURNISS: Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA: Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings System; Hope A. OLSON: Difference, Culture and Change:The Untapped Potential of LCSH - ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: Pauline Atherton COCHRANE: Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs Revisited-What Progress Has Been Made? What Issues Still Remain?; Gregory WOOL: Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters; Stephen HEARN: Machine-Assisted Validation of LC Subject Headings: Implications for Authority File Structure - SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVES: Thomas MANN: Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings; Louisa J. KREIDER: LCSH Works! Subject Searching Effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the Growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings Through Cooperation; Harriette HEMMASI u J. Bradford YOUNG: LCSH for Music: Historical and Empirical Perspectives; Joseph MILLER u. Patricia KUHR: LCSH and Periodical Indexing: Adoption vs. Adaptation; David P MILLER: Out from Under: Form/Genre Access in LCSH - WORLD VIEW: Magda HEINER-FREILING: Survey on Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies; Andrew MacEWAN: Crossing Language Barriers in Europe: Linking LCSH to Other Subject Heading Languages; Alvaro QUIJANO-SOLIS u.a.: Automated Authority Files of Spanish-Language Subject Headings - FUTURE PROSPECTS: Lois Mai CHAN u. Theodora HODGES: Entering the Millennium: a new century for LCSH
  14. ¬The LCSH century : One hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000) 0.02
    0.017496703 = product of:
      0.04374176 = sum of:
        0.038415954 = weight(_text_:u in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038415954 = score(doc=5366,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
        0.005325807 = weight(_text_:a in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005325807 = score(doc=5366,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: BACKGROUND: Alva T STONE: The LCSH Century: A Brief History of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and Introduction to the Centennial Essays - THEORY AND PRINCIPLES: Elaine SVENONIUS: LCSH: Semantics, Syntax and Specificity; Heidi Lee HOERMAN u. Kevin A. FURNISS: Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA: Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings System; Hope A. OLSON: Difference, Culture and Change:The Untapped Potential of LCSH - ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: Pauline Atherton COCHRANE: Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs Revisited-What Progress Has Been Made? What Issues Still Remain?; Gregory WOOL: Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters; Stephen HEARN: Machine-Assisted Validation of LC Subject Headings: Implications for Authority File Structure - SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVES: Thomas MANN: Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings; Louisa J. KREIDER: LCSH Works! Subject Searching Effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the Growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings Through Cooperation; Harriette HEMMASI u J. Bradford YOUNG: LCSH for Music: Historical and Empirical Perspectives; Joseph MILLER u. Patricia KUHR: LCSH and Periodical Indexing: Adoption vs. Adaptation; David P MILLER: Out from Under: Form/Genre Access in LCSH - WORLD VIEW: Magda HEINER-FREILING: Survey on Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies; Andrew MacEWAN: Crossing Language Barriers in Europe: Linking LCSH to Other Subject Heading Languages; Alvaro QUIJANO-SOLIS u.a.: Automated Authority Files of Spanish-Language Subject Headings - FUTURE PROSPECTS: Lois Mai CHAN u. Theodora HODGES: Entering the Millennium: a new century for LCSH
  15. Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002) 0.02
    0.016333332 = product of:
      0.040833328 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
        0.0072193667 = weight(_text_:a in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072193667 = score(doc=1395,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
    Type
    a
  16. Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998) 0.02
    0.01580342 = product of:
      0.03950855 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
        0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058945883 = score(doc=42,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Parent-Child relationships in MeSH trees were surveyed and described, and their patterns in the relational structure were determined for selected broad subject categories and subcategories. Is-a relationships dominated and were more prevalent overall than previously reported; however, an additional 67 different relationships were also seen, most of them nonhierarchical. Relational profiles were found to vary both within and among subject subdomains, but tended to display characteristic domain patterns. The implications for inferential reasoning and other cognitive and computational operations on hierarchical structures are considered
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  17. Green, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge : an overview (2001) 0.02
    0.01580342 = product of:
      0.03950855 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=1142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
        0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058945883 = score(doc=1142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Relationships are specified by simultaneously identifying a semantic relationship and the set of participants involved in it, pairing each participant with its role in the relationship. Properties pertaining to the participant set and the nature of the relationship are explored. Relationships in the organization of knowledge are surveyed, encompassing relationships between units of recorded knowledge based an descriptions of those units; intratextual and intertextual relationships, including relationships based an text structure, citation relationships, and hypertext links; subject relationships in thesauri and other classificatory structures, including relationships for literature-based knowledge discovery; and relevance relationships.
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
    Type
    a
  18. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.02
    0.015727429 = product of:
      0.03931857 = sum of:
        0.008250705 = weight(_text_:a in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008250705 = score(doc=2943,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
        0.031067865 = product of:
          0.06213573 = sum of:
            0.06213573 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06213573 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the developments of the Statistical System for Subject Designation (SSSD): a syntactical system for subject designation for libraries in Croatia, based on the construction of subject headings in agreement with the theory of the sentence nature of subject headings. The discussion is preceded by a brief summary of theories underlying basic principles and fundamental rules of the alphabetical subject catalogue
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
    Type
    a
  19. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.02
    0.015366382 = product of:
      0.07683191 = sum of:
        0.07683191 = weight(_text_:u in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07683191 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001) 0.02
    0.015305734 = product of:
      0.038264334 = sum of:
        0.028811965 = weight(_text_:u in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028811965 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
        0.00945237 = weight(_text_:a in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00945237 = score(doc=1138,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In a changing information environment, we need to reassess each element of bibliographic control, including classification theories and systems. Every classification system is a theoretical construct imposed an "reality." The classificatory relationships that are assumed to be valuable have generally received less attention than the topics included in the systems. Relationships are functions of both the syntactic and semantic axes of classification systems, and both explicit and implicit relationships are discussed. Examples are drawn from a number of different systems, both bibliographic and non-bibliographic, and the cultural warrant (i. e., the sociocultural context) of classification systems is examined. The part-whole relationship is discussed as an example of a universally valid concept that is treated as a component of the cultural warrant of a classification system.
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 85
  • d 22
  • f 2
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 96
  • m 7
  • s 7
  • el 4
  • r 3
  • x 2
  • More… Less…