Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.01 
    0.006396982 = product of:
  0.044778872 = sum of:
    0.044778872 = weight(_text_:institut in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044778872 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1470384 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.512738 = idf(docFreq=484, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026672479 = queryNorm
        0.30453864 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.512738 = idf(docFreq=484, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
  2. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.005734021 = product of:
  0.020069072 = sum of:
    0.01103469 = product of:
      0.03310407 = sum of:
        0.03310407 = weight(_text_:f in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03310407 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.009034382 = product of:
      0.018068764 = sum of:
        0.018068764 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018068764 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.004130003 = product of:
  0.02891002 = sum of:
    0.02891002 = product of:
      0.05782004 = sum of:
        0.05782004 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05782004 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.00 
    0.004130003 = product of:
  0.02891002 = sum of:
    0.02891002 = product of:
      0.05782004 = sum of:
        0.05782004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05782004 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.00 
    0.0038795783 = product of:
  0.013578524 = sum of:
    0.0027372662 = product of:
      0.010949065 = sum of:
        0.010949065 = weight(_text_:m in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010949065 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  6. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0036504413 = product of:
  0.025553089 = sum of:
    0.025553089 = product of:
      0.051106177 = sum of:
        0.051106177 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051106177 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  7. Model, F.: 'Citation indexing' und Rückwärtskatalogisierung' : Beispiele für Zitatendokumentation (1964) 0.00 
    0.0035669506 = product of:
  0.024968652 = sum of:
    0.024968652 = product of:
      0.074905954 = sum of:
        0.074905954 = weight(_text_:f in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074905954 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.7045941 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.0025812523 = product of:
  0.018068764 = sum of:
    0.018068764 = product of:
      0.03613753 = sum of:
        0.03613753 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03613753 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.00 
    0.0023800144 = product of:
  0.0166601 = sum of:
    0.0166601 = product of:
      0.0333202 = sum of:
        0.0333202 = weight(_text_:berlin in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0333202 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10719733 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.019024 = idf(docFreq=2159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.3108305 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.019024 = idf(docFreq=2159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  10. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.002190265 = product of:
  0.015331855 = sum of:
    0.015331855 = product of:
      0.03066371 = sum of:
        0.03066371 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03066371 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  11. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.00 
    0.0020650015 = product of:
  0.01445501 = sum of:
    0.01445501 = product of:
      0.02891002 = sum of:
        0.02891002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02891002 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  12. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00 
    0.0018068763 = product of:
  0.012648134 = sum of:
    0.012648134 = product of:
      0.025296267 = sum of:
        0.025296267 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025296267 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  13. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.00 
    0.0018068763 = product of:
  0.012648134 = sum of:
    0.012648134 = product of:
      0.025296267 = sum of:
        0.025296267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025296267 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  14. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.00 
    0.0018068763 = product of:
  0.012648134 = sum of:
    0.012648134 = product of:
      0.025296267 = sum of:
        0.025296267 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025296267 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  15. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017834753 = product of:
  0.012484326 = sum of:
    0.012484326 = product of:
      0.037452977 = sum of:
        0.037452977 = weight(_text_:f in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037452977 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  16. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017834753 = product of:
  0.012484326 = sum of:
    0.012484326 = product of:
      0.037452977 = sum of:
        0.037452977 = weight(_text_:f in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037452977 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  17. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  18. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  19. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  20. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 11
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 49
  • m 6
  • el 4
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications