Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Eisenberg, M."
  1. Eisenberg, M.: Big 6 tips : teaching information problem solving (1998) 0.01
    0.0071388874 = product of:
      0.02855555 = sum of:
        0.02855555 = weight(_text_:information in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02855555 = score(doc=3355,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at tip no.4.2 of 6 tips on Teaching information problem solving, the Use of information, and specifically, the extracting of relevant information
  2. Eisenberg, M.: Big 6 tips : number two. Information seeking strategies (1997) 0.01
    0.0059490725 = product of:
      0.02379629 = sum of:
        0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 1584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02379629 = score(doc=1584,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 1584, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1584)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses stage 2 in the process of teaching information problem solving, information seeking strategies, which has 2 components: determining the range of possible sources, and evaluating them to determine priorities. Describes 'brainstorming and narrow', the essential process for information seeking strategies
  3. Eisenberg, M.: Big 6 tips : teaching information problem solving (1997) 0.01
    0.0051520485 = product of:
      0.020608194 = sum of:
        0.020608194 = weight(_text_:information in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020608194 = score(doc=1397,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the Big 6 approach to information and technology skills instruction focusing on the first stage in the process, task definition, which has 2 components: defining the problem and identifying the information
  4. Eisenberg, M.; Schamber, L.: Relevance : the search for a definition (1988) 0.01
    0.0051002675 = product of:
      0.02040107 = sum of:
        0.02040107 = weight(_text_:information in 3552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02040107 = score(doc=3552,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 3552, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3552)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although relevance judgements are fundamental to the design and evaluation of all information retrieval systems, information scientists have not reached a consensus in defining the central concept of relevance. Re-examines the viewpoints of major writers in the field, then introduces a new approach. Considers that relevance is a multidimensional concept; that it is based on the human judgement process; that it is dependant on both internal (cognitive) and external (situational) factors; and that it is intersubjective but nevertheless systematic and measurable. Suggests a different paradigm from the classic source-to-destination communication model of information retrieval.
    Imprint
    Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information Inc.
    Source
    ASIS'88. Information technology: planning for the next fifty years. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Atlanta, Georgia, 23.-27.10.1988. Vol.25. Ed. by C.L. Borgman and E.Y.H. Pai
  5. Eisenberg, M.: Big 6 tips : teaching information problem solving (1998) 0.00
    0.0042066295 = product of:
      0.016826518 = sum of:
        0.016826518 = weight(_text_:information in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016826518 = score(doc=1733,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses stage 3 of the Big 6 process, location and access, which has 2 components: locate sources; and find information within sources. Looks at the 3 concepts involved: index, keyword and Boolean searching
  6. Eisenberg, M.; Barry, C.: Order effects : a study of the possible influence of presentation order on user judgments of document relevance (1988) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 5361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=5361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5361)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.293-300