Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0059490725 = product of:
  0.02379629 = sum of:
    0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02379629 = score(doc=2859,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.2, S.150-151 (R. Yeates)

LCSH

Information science / Great Britain / Computer network / resources

Subject

Information science / Great Britain / Computer network / resources

0.004759258 = product of:
  0.019037032 = sum of:
    0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 1645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019037032 = score(doc=1645,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1645, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1645)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Managing information 3(1996) no.5, S.53 (D. Ball); IfB 4(1996) H.2/3, S.211-212 (M. Werner); Program 30(1996) no.3, S.313-314 (F. Hendrix)

LCSH

Information science / Great Britain / Computer network resources

Subject

Information science / Great Britain / Computer network resources

0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 6263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=6263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6263)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.004121639 = product of:
  0.016486555 = sum of:
    0.016486555 = weight(_text_:information in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016486555 = score(doc=4871,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

SOSIG (Social Science Information Gateway) aims to provide a trusted source of selected, high quality Internet information for researchers and practitioners in the social sciences, business and law. This article tracks the the development of the gateway since its inception in 1994, describes the current features and looks at some of the associated research and development areas that are taking place around the service including the automatic classification of Web resources and experiments with multilingual thesauri

Source

Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.54-58

0.0025760243 = product of:
  0.010304097 = sum of:
    0.010304097 = weight(_text_:information in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010304097 = score(doc=3311,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.

Series

Advances in information science

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.3-16