Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jones, S."
  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Jones, S.: ¬A thesaurus data model for an intelligent retrieval system (1993) 0.00
    0.003091229 = product of:
      0.012364916 = sum of:
        0.012364916 = weight(_text_:information in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012364916 = score(doc=5279,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper demonstrates the application of conventional database design techniques to thesaurus representation. The thesaurus is considered as a printed document, as a semantic net, and as a relational database to be used in conjunction with an intelligent information retrieval system. Some issues raised by analysis of two standard thesauri include: the prevalence of compound terms and the representation of term structure; thesaurus redundancy and the extent to which it can be eliminated in machine-readable versions; the difficulty of exploiting thesaurus knowledge originally designed for human rather than automatic interpretation; deriving 'strength of association' measures between terms in a thesaurus considered as a semantic net; facet representation and the need for variations in the data model to cater for structural differences between thesauri. A complete schema of database tables is presented, with an outline suggestion for using the stored information when matching one or more thesaurus terms with a user's query
    Source
    Journal of information science. 19(1993), S.167-178
  2. Jones, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Support strategies for interactive thesaurus navigation (1994) 0.00
    0.0020821756 = product of:
      0.008328702 = sum of:
        0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 7734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008328702 = score(doc=7734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7734)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In principle, the 'knowledge' encoded in a thesaurus can be exploited in many ways to help users clarify their information needs and enhance query performance, but attempts to automate this process via AI techniques face many practical difficulties. In the short term it may be more useful to improve support for direct interactive use of thesauri. We discuss some of the issues which have arisen when building an interface for thesaurus navigation and query enhancement, drawing on logs and user feedback from ongoing small-scale experiments
  3. Jones, S.; Gatford, M.; Robertson, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Secker, J.; Walker, S.: Interactive thesaurus navigation : intelligence rules OK? (1995) 0.00
    0.0020821756 = product of:
      0.008328702 = sum of:
        0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008328702 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.52-59