Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, J."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Lancaster, F.W.; Li, J.: ¬The law of constant accessibility of information (1988/89) 0.01
    0.007212868 = product of:
      0.028851472 = sum of:
        0.028851472 = weight(_text_:information in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028851472 = score(doc=1565,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 15(1988/89), S.24-25
    Theme
    Information
  2. Wu, S.; Li, J.; Zeng, X.; Bi, Y.: Adaptive data fusion methods in information retrieval (2014) 0.00
    0.003606434 = product of:
      0.014425736 = sum of:
        0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 1500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014425736 = score(doc=1500,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1500, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1500)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Data fusion is currently used extensively in information retrieval for various tasks. It has proved to be a useful technology because it is able to improve retrieval performance frequently. However, in almost all prior research in data fusion, static search environments have been used, and dynamic search environments have generally not been considered. In this article, we investigate adaptive data fusion methods that can change their behavior when the search environment changes. Three adaptive data fusion methods are proposed and investigated. To test these proposed methods properly, we generate a benchmark from a historic Text REtrieval Conference data set. Experiments with the benchmark show that 2 of the proposed methods are good and may potentially be used in practice.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2048-2061
  3. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Cao, J.: External concept support for group support systems through Web mining (2009) 0.00
    0.003091229 = product of:
      0.012364916 = sum of:
        0.012364916 = weight(_text_:information in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012364916 = score(doc=2806,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    External information plays an important role in group decision-making processes, yet research about external information support for Group Support Systems (GSS) has been lacking. In this study, we propose an approach to build a concept space to provide external concept support for GSS users. Built on a Web mining algorithm, the approach can mine a concept space from the Web and retrieve related concepts from the concept space based on users' comments in a real-time manner. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the quality of the proposed approach and the effectiveness of the external concept support provided by this approach. The experiment results indicate that the concept space mined from the Web contained qualified concepts to stimulate divergent thinking. The results also demonstrate that external concept support in GSS greatly enhanced group productivity for idea generation tasks.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.5, S.1057-1070
  4. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.00
    0.003091229 = product of:
      0.012364916 = sum of:
        0.012364916 = weight(_text_:information in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012364916 = score(doc=3441,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we describe another problem with journal impact factors by showing that one journal's impact factor is dependent on other journals' publication delays. The proposed theoretical model predicts a monotonically decreasing function of the impact factor as a function of publication delay, on condition that the citation curve of the journal is monotone increasing during the publication window used in the calculation of the journal impact factor; otherwise, this function has a reversed U shape. Our findings based on simulations are verified by examining three journals in the information sciences: the Journal of Informetrics, Scientometrics, and the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.780-789
  5. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.00
    0.0025760243 = product of:
      0.010304097 = sum of:
        0.010304097 = weight(_text_:information in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010304097 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54
  6. Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, H.: Kernel-based learning for biomedical relation extraction (2008) 0.00
    0.0025239778 = product of:
      0.010095911 = sum of:
        0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 1611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010095911 = score(doc=1611,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1611, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1611)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Relation extraction is the process of scanning text for relationships between named entities. Recently, significant studies have focused on automatically extracting relations from biomedical corpora. Most existing biomedical relation extractors require manual creation of biomedical lexicons or parsing templates based on domain knowledge. In this study, we propose to use kernel-based learning methods to automatically extract biomedical relations from literature text. We develop a framework of kernel-based learning for biomedical relation extraction. In particular, we modified the standard tree kernel function by incorporating a trace kernel to capture richer contextual information. In our experiments on a biomedical corpus, we compare different kernel functions for biomedical relation detection and classification. The experimental results show that a tree kernel outperforms word and sequence kernels for relation detection, our trace-tree kernel outperforms the standard tree kernel, and a composite kernel outperforms individual kernels for relation extraction.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.756-769
  7. Zhao, S.X.; Zhang, P.L.; Li, J.; Tan, A.M.; Ye, F.Y.: Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths (2014) 0.00
    0.0025239778 = product of:
      0.010095911 = sum of:
        0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010095911 = score(doc=1256,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most measures of networks are based on the nodes, although links are also elementary units in networks and represent interesting social or physical connections. In this work we suggest an option for exploring networks, called the h-strength, with explicit focus on links and their strengths. The h-strength and its extensions can naturally simplify a complex network to a small and concise subnetwork (h-subnet) but retains the most important links with its core structure. Its applications in 2 typical information networks, the paper cocitation network of a topic (the h-index) and 5 scientific collaboration networks in the field of "water resources," suggest that h-strength and its extensions could be a useful choice for abstracting, simplifying, and visualizing a complex network. Moreover, we observe that the 2 informetric models, the Glänzel-Schubert model and the Hirsch model, roughly hold in the context of the h-strength for the collaboration networks.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.984-994
  8. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Song, D.; Wu, Y.: Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs (2017) 0.00
    0.0025239778 = product of:
      0.010095911 = sum of:
        0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010095911 = score(doc=3961,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Modeling multidimensional relevance in information retrieval (IR) has attracted much attention in recent years. However, most existing studies are conducted through relatively small-scale user studies, which may not reflect a real-world and natural search scenario. In this article, we propose to study the multidimensional user relevance model (MURM) on large scale query logs, which record users' various search behaviors (e.g., query reformulations, clicks and dwelling time, etc.) in natural search settings. We advance an existing MURM model (including five dimensions: topicality, novelty, reliability, understandability, and scope) by providing two additional dimensions, that is, interest and habit. The two new dimensions represent personalized relevance judgment on retrieved documents. Further, for each dimension in the enriched MURM model, a set of computable features are formulated. By conducting extensive document ranking experiments on Bing's query logs and TREC session Track data, we systematically investigated the impact of each dimension on retrieval performance and gained a series of insightful findings which may bring benefits for the design of future IR systems.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.12, S.2743-2754
  9. Zhang, C.; Zeng, D.; Li, J.; Wang, F.-Y.; Zuo, W.: Sentiment analysis of Chinese documents : from sentence to document level (2009) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2474-2487
  10. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.432-440
  11. Xie, Z.; Ouyang, Z.; Li, J.; Dong, E.: Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks (2018) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=4043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.2, S.305-317
  12. Li, J.; Sun, A.; Xing, Z.: To do or not to do : distill crowdsourced negative caveats to augment api documentation (2018) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 4575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=4575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4575)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.12, S.1460-1475
  13. Du, Q.; Li, J.; Du, Y.; Wang, G.A.; Fan, W.: Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences (2021) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.12, S.1558-1574
  14. Liu, X.; Bu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, J.: Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration (2024) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 75(2023) no.1, S.59-78
  15. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.378-393
  16. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=4970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.139-162
  17. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.10, S.1271-1282
  18. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.: Joint modeling of characters, words, and conversation contexts for microblog keyphrase extraction (2020) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=5816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.5, S.553-567