Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Martin, H."
  • × author_ss:"Nicholas, D."
  1. Nicholas, D.; Martin, H.: Assessing information needs : a case study of journalists (1997) 0.01
    0.006295907 = product of:
      0.025183627 = sum of:
        0.025183627 = weight(_text_:information in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025183627 = score(doc=450,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines a structure for analysing information needs. The purpose of the structure is to enable data on users to be collected in a systematic and routine manner. The form of analysis is demonstrated through a consideration of the information needs of newspaper journalists. Aspects of information need considered are: subject, nature, function, viewpoint, authority, quantity, quality, place of origin, speed of delivery, and processing/packaging. Considers the barriers to meeting information needs and training, time, resources, access and information overload. Also assesses the library's role in meeting information needs
  2. Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Martin, H.; Cole, P.: ¬The media and the Internet : Final report of the British Library-funded research project: The Changing Information Environment: The Impact of the Internet on Information Seeking Behaviour in the Media (1998) 0.00
    0.0042066295 = product of:
      0.016826518 = sum of:
        0.016826518 = weight(_text_:information in 4597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016826518 = score(doc=4597,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4597, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4597)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Cole, P.; Martin, H.: ¬The impact of the Internet on information seeking in the Media (2000) 0.00
    0.0036430482 = product of:
      0.014572193 = sum of:
        0.014572193 = weight(_text_:information in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014572193 = score(doc=722,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    There is very little qualitative data on what impact the Internet is having on information seeking in the workplace. Using open-ended interviews, questionnaires and observation, the impact of the Internet on the British Media was assessed. The focus was largely on newspapers, with The Guardian being covered in some depth. Over 300 journalists and media librarians were surveyed. It was found that amongst traditional journalists use was light. Poor access to the Internet - and good access to other information resources - were largely the reasons for this. Of the journalists it was mainly the older and more senior journalists and the New Media journalists who used the Internet. Librarians were also significant users. Searching the World Wide Web was the principal Internet activity and use was generally conservative in character. Newspapers and official sites were favoured, and searches were mainly of a fact-checking nature. Email was used on a very limited scale and was not regarded as a serious journalistic tool. Non-users were partly put off by the Internet's potential for overloading them with information and its reputation for producing information of suspect quality. Users generally dismissed these concerns, dealing with potential overload and quality problems largely by using authoritative sites and exploiting the lower quality data where it was needed. Where the Internet has been used it has not been at the expense of other information sources or communication channels, but online hosts seem to be at most risk in the future.