Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Meadow, C.T."
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.00 
    0.004655886 = product of:
  0.018623544 = sum of:
    0.018623544 = weight(_text_:information in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018623544 = score(doc=1795,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  2. Marchionini, G.; Meadow, C.T.; Dwiggins, S.; Lin, X.; Jiabin, W.; Yuan, W.: ¬A study of user interaction with information retrieval interfaces : progress report (1991) 0.00 
    0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=4350,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports progress and future plans for a project to study the interactions of users with information retrieval interfaces. Tests are run with professional data base searchers and with end users who are members of a profession but have little or no searching experience. Interfaces tested include a command language search system used to search DIALOG bibliographic data bases, a non-procedural system that produces DIALOG commands, and several full text systems, including one using hypertext. The intent is to determine which kinds of users perform best with each type of interface. The project is being conducted jointly bay the University of Toronto and the University of Maryland
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.42-59
  3. Yuan, W.; Meadow, C.T.: ¬A study of the use of variables in information retrieval user studies (1999) 0.00 
    0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=2943,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article reports on an exploratory study of the measurement of commonality in the use of variables or measures by authors and groups of authors who have reported on studies of information retrieval system users. There is some similarity to co-citation analysis in that, when 2 individual papers, or 2 authors of sveral works, use the same variables, this indicates a similarity in approach to the subject. Such usage may be a stroger indication of similarity than co-citation be cause it represents what the authors did, rather than what they say
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.2, S.140-150

Authors

Themes