Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
-
×
author_ss:"Snow, K."
- Did you mean:
- editor_ss:"schwerpunktinitiative "digitale information" der alliant der deutschen wissenschaftsorganisationen" 2
- editor_ss:"schwerpunktinitiative "digitale information" der allianz der deutschen wissenschaftsorganisation" 2
- editor_ss:"schwerpunktinitiativen "digitale information" der allianz der deutschen wissenschaftsorganisationen" 2
- editor_ss:"schwerpunktinitiative "digitale information" der alliance der deutschen wissenschaftsorganisationen" 2
- editor_ss:"schwerpunktinitiativen "digitale information" der alliant der deutschen wissenschaftsorganisationen" 2
-
Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022)
0.00
0.0029446408 = product of: 0.011778563 = sum of: 0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011778563 = score(doc=1141,freq=4.0), product of: 0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.034944877 = queryNorm 0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141) 0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.00
0.0020821756 = product of: 0.008328702 = sum of: 0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.008328702 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of: 0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.034944877 = queryNorm 0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609) 0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.