Sugano, I.: ¬The study of criteria for evaluating OPACs as information retrieval systems (1996)
0.01
0.0053210123 = product of:
0.02128405 = sum of:
0.02128405 = weight(_text_:information in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02128405 = score(doc=1626,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Most of the criteria proposed to date for the evaluation of OPACs focus on evaluation of their retrieval function. Argues that the storage function is more important because the quality of information retrieval systems is dependent on the quality of stored information as well as the description and depth of indexing of stored information. States that OPACs should therefore be evaluated from the perspectives of both storage and retrieval functions. Examines 4 studies on criteria for evaluating OPACs and suggests a new evaluation framework based on the work of C.R. Hildreth
- Source
- Library and information science. 1996, no.35, S.41-49
