Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.029893843 = product of:
  0.059787687 = sum of:
    0.051374428 = weight(_text_:digitale in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051374428 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.2849832 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008413259 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Vorgestellt wird die Konstruktion eines thematisch geordneten Thesaurus auf Basis der Sachschlagwörter der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) unter Nutzung der darin enthaltenen DDC-Notationen. Oberste Ordnungsebene dieses Thesaurus werden die DDC-Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Die Konstruktion des Thesaurus erfolgt regelbasiert unter der Nutzung von Linked Data Prinzipien in einem SPARQL Prozessor. Der Thesaurus dient der automatisierten Gewinnung von Metadaten aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen mittels eines computerlinguistischen Extraktors. Hierzu werden digitale Volltexte verarbeitet. Dieser ermittelt die gefundenen Schlagwörter über Vergleich der Zeichenfolgen Benennungen im Thesaurus, ordnet die Treffer nach Relevanz im Text und gibt die zugeordne-ten Sachgruppen rangordnend zurück. Die grundlegende Annahme dabei ist, dass die gesuchte Sachgruppe unter den oberen Rängen zurückgegeben wird. In einem dreistufigen Verfahren wird die Leistungsfähigkeit des Verfahrens validiert. Hierzu wird zunächst anhand von Metadaten und Erkenntnissen einer Kurzautopsie ein Goldstandard aus Dokumenten erstellt, die im Online-Katalog der DNB abrufbar sind. Die Dokumente vertei-len sich über 14 der Sachgruppen mit einer Losgröße von jeweils 50 Dokumenten. Sämtliche Dokumente werden mit dem Extraktor erschlossen und die Ergebnisse der Kategorisierung do-kumentiert. Schließlich wird die sich daraus ergebende Retrievalleistung sowohl für eine harte (binäre) Kategorisierung als auch eine rangordnende Rückgabe der Sachgruppen beurteilt.

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

Imprint

Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität

0.0042066295 = product of:
  0.016826518 = sum of:
    0.016826518 = weight(_text_:information in 7325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016826518 = score(doc=7325,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 7325, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7325)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Indexer 20(1996) no.2, S.108 (A. McCarthy); Journal of librarianship and information science 29(1997) no.3, S.165-166 (A. Gilchrist)

0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Contributions in librarianship and information science; 3

0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations

0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

New forms of man-machine interaction are becoming available that have great power for the delivery of information. But the scales of speed and capacity on which the computing machines operate demand new thoughts as to how information can be stored and retrieved. The objective of the discussion in this paper is to argue for a combination of natural-language processing and subject classification to be able to meet the demands

0.003091229 = product of:
  0.012364916 = sum of:
    0.012364916 = weight(_text_:information in 5518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012364916 = score(doc=5518,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5518, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5518)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The article describes the research done over a bibliographic database in order to show the impact the specificity of the knowledge organising tools may have on information retrieval (IR). For this purpose two multilingual Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) based thesauri having different degrees of specificity are considered. Issues of harmonising a classificatory structure with a thesaurus structure are introduced, and significant aspects of information retrieval in a multilingual environment are examined in an extensive manner. Aspects of complementarity are discussed with particular emphasis on the real impact produced on IR by alternative search facilities. Finally, a number of conclusions are formulated as they arise from the study.

Content

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"

0.0025239778 = product of:
  0.010095911 = sum of:
    0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010095911 = score(doc=557,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Wa(h)re Information: 29. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag Bregenz, 19.-23.9.2006. Hrsg.: Harald Weigel

0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Defines the basic functions of surrogate files in information retrieval. Exemplifies the categories enunciated in the general theory of classification developed in India. Defines the principles for structuring the concepts. Formulates set of general postulates pertaining to the structure of compound subjects. On the basis of these, outlines a procedure for structuring of subject headings. Demonstrates the application of procedure through examples

0.0021033147 = product of:
  0.008413259 = sum of:
    0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008413259 = score(doc=1593,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the early 1990s, indexing with classification codes from the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in an academic library, going from traditional to automated routines in any and all its activities, suddenly proved insufficient. Under the circumstances of online searching, the possibilities offered by the new OPAC looked much more attractive to indexers and searchers alike. Therefore, a quick shift to indexing with UDC and keywords instead of UDC numbers alone was made. Currency, precision and, more importantly, user-friendliness were strong advantages offered by keyword indexing and searching. But the larger the dictionary of keywords, the more problematic the consequences an information scattering, given the lack of control an terms. The present paper describes the advantages of the UDC in indexing by presenting some of the devices it is provided with: subdivision by analogy, common and special auxiliaries, use of synthesis, and use of connecting symbols. The solution of indexing with both UDC notation and words from a thesaurus based an UDC was prompted by some other characteristics of the schedules: a semi-faceted classification system, hierarchical organisation, richness in terminology and consistency and control of notation. The methodology used in building the thesaurus is conceived according to the international standards (ISO 2788 and 5964) to which some principles have been added, giving the specific approach of harmonising a classification structure with that of a thesaurus. Compatibility and translatability issues are also considered and some problems arising from them are treated in detail. Most of the problems discussed are illustrated with examples.

Imprint

Medford, NJ : Information Today

0.0017847219 = product of:
  0.0071388874 = sum of:
    0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 3126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071388874 = score(doc=3126,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3126, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3126)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Im folgenden wird über ein Projekt berichtet, das als Arbeitspaket eingebunden war in die Sonderfördermaßnahme CARMEN (Content Analysis, Retrieval and MetaData: Effective Networking), die im Rahmen von Global Info vom BMBF gefördert wurde. Die Bearbeitung von Crosskonkordanzen war dem Themenschwerpunkt "Verfahren zur Behandlung von Heterogenität bei textueller Information verschiedener Datentypen und Inhaltserschließungsverfahren" zugeordnet. Darin ging es neben maschinellen Verfahren zur Erzeugung von Metadaten um die Behandlung semantischer Heterogenität durch Transferbeziehungen, die maschinell mit Hilfe quantitativ-statistischer Verfahren und intellektuell durch Crosskonkordanzen hergestellt wurden. Konkreter Zweck der Crosskonkordanzen ist es, eine integrierte Suche nach sachlichen Gesichtspunkten in verteilten Datenbeständen mit unterschiedlichen inhaltlichen Schwerpunkten zu ermöglichen. Die Crosskonkordanzen sollen dabei den begrifflichen Unterschieden der verwendeten Klassifikationen und Thesauri Rechnung tragen.

0.0016826519 = product of:
  0.0067306077 = sum of:
    0.0067306077 = weight(_text_:information in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0067306077 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

The aim of this initiative is to provide the users of online library catalogues and information gateways of cooperating libraries with a prototype for multilingual subject searching in online environment. Library collections of these libraries are large and without any doubt very valuable for researchers throughout Europe. What is needed is a standardized, authorized indexing and retrieval tool which would bring together all their catalogues and databases and enable multilingual subject searching. At the beginning of the project, a number of factors affecting subject indexing in current environment and cross-searching for subjects have been identified. These factors include - standardization of subject retrieval process and indexing and classification tools - subject retrieval methods - possibility of interoperability among different indexing and classification schemes - multilingualism issue - possibility to increase precision and recall trough Z39.50 protocol and its profiles and to apply authority control in subject retrieval process - need for cooperation

Footnote

Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.

0.0014872681 = product of:
  0.0059490725 = sum of:
    0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 3179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059490725 = score(doc=3179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3179)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information Gateway

0.0011898145 = product of:
  0.004759258 = sum of:
    0.004759258 = weight(_text_:information in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004759258 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information Gateway