Search (93 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Scholz, M.: Wie können Daten im Web mit JSON nachgenutzt werden? (2023) 0.02
    0.020549772 = product of:
      0.08219909 = sum of:
        0.08219909 = weight(_text_:digitale in 5345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08219909 = score(doc=5345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.45597312 = fieldWeight in 5345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5345)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Martin Scholz ist Informatiker an der Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg. Als Leiter der dortigen Gruppe Digitale Entwicklung und Datenmanagement beschäftigt er sich viel mit Webtechniken und Datentransformation. Er setzt sich mit der aktuellen ABI-Techik-Frage auseinander: Wie können Daten im Web mit JSON nachgenutzt werden?
  2. ISO 2709: Format for information exchange (1996) 0.01
    0.0059490725 = product of:
      0.02379629 = sum of:
        0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02379629 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Information transfer and exchange formats (1991) 0.01
    0.0059490725 = product of:
      0.02379629 = sum of:
        0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02379629 = score(doc=7891,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes international standard exchange formats for bibliographic information transfer. Outlines their common and differing features. Describes: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference manual and UNECSO Common Communication Format
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  4. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.005828877 = product of:
      0.023315508 = sum of:
        0.023315508 = weight(_text_:information in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023315508 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
  5. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.01
    0.0055089183 = product of:
      0.022035673 = sum of:
        0.022035673 = weight(_text_:information in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022035673 = score(doc=6523,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
  6. Chowdhury, G.G.: Record formats for integrated databases : a review and comparison (1996) 0.01
    0.0055089183 = product of:
      0.022035673 = sum of:
        0.022035673 = weight(_text_:information in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022035673 = score(doc=7679,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the issues involved in the development of data formats for computerized information retrieval systems. Integrated databases capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information, in a single database structure, are more convenient for searching and retrieval by end users. Several bibliographic formats have been developed and are used for these bibliographic control puposes. Reviews features of 6 major bibliographic formats: USMARC, UKMARC, UNIMARC, CCF, MIBIS and ABNCD are reviewed. Only 2 formats: CCF and ABNCD are capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information and supporting the design of integrated databases. The comparison suggests that, while CCF makes more detailed provision for bibliographic information, ABNCD makes better provision for factual information such as profiles of institutions, information systems, projects and human experts
    Source
    Information development. 12(1996) no.4, S.218-223
  7. Simmons, P.: Microcomputer software for ISO 2709 record conversion (1989) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Microcomputers for information management. 6(1989), S.197-205
  8. Mackenzie Owen, J.S.: Format incompatibility and the exchange of bibliographic information : a comparative study (1976) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. USMARC format for community information : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 8044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=8044,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 8044, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8044)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The latest format. Features specifications for inputting and communicating community information - i.e., information about non-bibliographic resources (programs, services, organizations, individuals, one-time and ongoing events) that fulfill a community's information needs. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Includes full record examples showing how records are coded
  10. Avram, H.D.: Machine-readable cataloging (MARC) (1988) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=1277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.43, [=Suppl.8]
  11. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1991) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. CCF/B: The Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (1992) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 8713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=8713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8713)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. CCF/F: The Common Communication Format for factual information (1992) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (CCF/B) (1993) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for factual information (CCF/F) (1993) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Cantrall, D.: From MARC to Mosaic : progressing toward data interchangeability at the Oregon State Archives (1994) 0.00
    0.003606434 = product of:
      0.014425736 = sum of:
        0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 8470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014425736 = score(doc=8470,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 8470, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8470)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Explains the technology used by the Oregon State Archives to relaize the goal of data interchangeability given the prescribed nature of the MARC format. Describes an emergent model of learning and information delivery focusing on the example of World Wide Web, accessed most often by the software client Mosaic, which is the fastest growing segment of the Internet information highway. Also describes The Data Magician, a flexible program which allows for many combinations of input and output formats, and will read unconventional formats such as MARC communications format. Oregon State Archives, using Mosaic and The Data Magician, are consequently able to present valuable electronic information to a variety of users
  17. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.00
    0.003606434 = product of:
      0.014425736 = sum of:
        0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014425736 = score(doc=7683,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
  18. Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001) 0.00
    0.003606434 = product of:
      0.014425736 = sum of:
        0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014425736 = score(doc=5896,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
    Source
    Journal of digital information. 1(2001) no.8
  19. Skvortsov, V.; Zhlobinskaya, O.; Pashkova, A.: UNIMARC XML slim schema : living in new environment (2005) 0.00
    0.003606434 = product of:
      0.014425736 = sum of:
        0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014425736 = score(doc=4335,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the role of XML and its perspectives in library information systems, particularly with regards to basic functions of bibliographic formats - storage and transportation of the data. Slim XML Schema for UNIMARC representation is presented, its main features being lossless conversion from MARC to XML, roundtripability from XML back to MARC, support for embedded fields and extended range of indicator values, independence from any specific dialect of MARC format, stability to any changes of the format.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Series
    121 UNIMARC with Information Technology ; 064-E
  20. McCallum, S.H.: MARCXML sampler (2005) 0.00
    0.003606434 = product of:
      0.014425736 = sum of:
        0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014425736 = score(doc=4361,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    At the IFLA conference in Glasgow, three years ago, the Information Technology Section organized a workshop on metadata. At that workshop MARCXML was presented, along with plans and expectations for its use. This paper is an update to that report. It reviews the development of an XML schema for MARC 21 and the MARCXML tool kit of transformations. The close relationship of MARCXML to the recent ISO standards work associated with MARC in XML is described. Sketches of interesting applications follow with uses that range from MARCXML as a switching format to a maintenance tool to a record communication format for new XML-based protocols.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Series
    121 UNIMARC with Information Technology ; 175-E121

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 71
  • m 12
  • el 6
  • s 4
  • n 3
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…