Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Skorsky, M.: Dokumentensammlungen : Strukturiert und recherchiert mit TOSKANA (1996) 0.03 
    0.030824658 = product of:
  0.12329863 = sum of:
    0.12329863 = weight(_text_:digitale in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12329863 = score(doc=5261,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.68395966 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Die digitale Revolution: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1996, Neue Universität Heidelberg, 24.-26.9.1996. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  2. Neuss, C.; Kent, R.E.: Conceptual analysis of resource meta-information (1995) 0.01 
    0.005828877 = product of:
  0.023315508 = sum of:
    0.023315508 = weight(_text_:information in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023315508 = score(doc=2204,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    With the continuously growing amount of Internet accessible information resources, locating relevant information in the WWW becomes increasingly difficult. Recent developments provide scalable mechanisms for maintaing indexes of network accessible information. In order to implement sophisticated retrieval engines, a means of automatic analysis and classification of document meta information has to be found. Proposes the use of methods from the mathematical theory of concept analysis to analyze and interactively explore the information space defined by wide area resource discovery services
  3. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=8826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information
  4. Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  5. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Dortmund, April 1-3, 1992. Ed.: O. Opitz u.a
  6. Rusch, A.; Wille, R.: Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis (1996) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
  7. Skorsky, M.: Graphische Darstellung eines Thesaurus (1997) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation: Qualität und Qualifikation. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1997, Universität Regensburg, 24.-26.9.1997. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld u. G.J. Mantwill
  8. Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999) 0.00 
    0.0035694435 = product of:
  0.014277774 = sum of:
    0.014277774 = weight(_text_:information in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277774 = score(doc=2470,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Even for the experienced information professional, designing an efficient multi-purpose information access structure can be a very difficult task. This paper argues for the use of a faceted thesaurus as the basis for organizing a small-scale institutional website. We contend that a faceted approach to knowledge organization can make the process of organization less random and more manageable. We begin by reporting on an informal survey of three institutional websites. This study underscores the problems of organization that can impact access to information. We then formalize the terminology of faceted thesauri and demonstrate its application with several examples.
    The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  9. Reinartz, T.P.; Zickwolff, M.: ¬Two conceptual approaches to acquire human expert knowledge in a complex real world domain (1996) 0.00 
    0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=5908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
  10. Sedelow, W.A.: ¬The formal analysis of concepts (1993) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices
  11. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00 
    0.0020821756 = product of:
  0.008328702 = sum of:
    0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008328702 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes