Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  • × theme_ss:"Biographische Darstellungen"
  1. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=75,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  2. Kumar, K.: Historical roots of Ranganathan's Colon Classification (Edition 1) (1992) 0.00
    0.0029446408 = product of:
      0.011778563 = sum of:
        0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011778563 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes S.R. Ranganathan's contribution to library and information science in general, mentioning his library education at London and influence of W.C. Berwick Sayers. Describes the seeds of Colon Classification, ed.1 (CC-1) and discusses the salient features of the scheme. Brings out the indebtedness of Ranganathan to Melvil Dewey and describes the influence of UDC on CC-1. Discusses the growth and development of the concept of 'categories', mentioning the influence of W. Hulme, W.S. Biscoe and others. Concludes that Ranganathan possessed an amazing degree of ingenuity to apply established ideas in such a way in a distinctive and original way
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 17(1992) no.1, S.71-81
  3. Wiegand, W.A.: ¬The "¬Amherst method" : the origins of the Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme (1998) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although a debate about the origins of the DDC has been going on for generations, historical consensus remains elusive. Contributes new information to the historiography on the origins of the Scheme, by (1) grounding an account of Melvil Dewey's thinking as he was crafting the Decimal Classification on an analysis of a larger body of sources than previous classification historians have consulted; and (2) by expanding and deepening historical understanding of the contextual forces influencing his decisions on the classification structure