Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

0.0687882 = product of:
  0.1375764 = sum of:
    0.12329863 = weight(_text_:digitale in 5236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12329863 = score(doc=5236,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.68395966 = fieldWeight in 5236, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5236)
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 5236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=5236,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5236, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5236)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Die digitale Revolution: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1996, Neue Universität Heidelberg, 24.-26.9.1996. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer

Theme

Information

0.008328702 = product of:
  0.03331481 = sum of:
    0.03331481 = weight(_text_:information in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03331481 = score(doc=2997,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.5430733 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.1, S.16-21

Theme

Information

0.007212868 = product of:
  0.028851472 = sum of:
    0.028851472 = weight(_text_:information in 6876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028851472 = score(doc=6876,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 6876, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6876)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information

0.0065844175 = product of:
  0.02633767 = sum of:
    0.02633767 = weight(_text_:information in 4003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02633767 = score(doc=4003,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.42933714 = fieldWeight in 4003, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4003)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: WOLF, M.T. u. R.B. MILLER: The information future: data, data, everywhere!; WOLFE, G.: Libraries on the superhighway: rest stop or roadkill?; AGRE, P.E.: Institutional circuity: thinking about the forms and uses of information; LYRIS, S.O.: Multiply and conquer; MASON, L.: The elephant and the net cruiser: regulating communication on the net; BRIN, D.: The Internet as a commons; MARTIN, M.S.: Problems in information transfer in the age of the computer; BARNES, J.: Information and unfictionable science; STARRS, P.F. u. HUNTSINGER, L.: The matrix, cyberpunk literature, and the apocalyptic landscapes of information technology; PRANSKY, J.: Robots: our future information intermediaries; CHISLENKO, A.: Intelligent information filters and enhanced reality; BARNES, S.: The impossible dream

Source

Information technology and libraries. 14(1995) no.4, S.219-269

Theme

Information

0.006182458 = product of:
  0.024729831 = sum of:
    0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024729831 = score(doc=1365,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Trust in information is developing into a vitally important topic as the Internet becomes increasingly ubiquitous within society. Although many discussions of trust in this environment focus on issues like security, technical reliability, or e-commerce, few address the problem of trust in the information obtained from the Internet. The authors assert that there is a strong need for theoretical and empirical research on trust within the field of information science. As an initial step, the present study develops a model of trust in digital information by integrating the research on trust from the behavioral and social sciences with the research on information quality and human- computer interaction. The model positions trust as a key mediating variable between information quality and information usage, with important consequences for both the producers and consumers of digital information. The authors close by outlining important directions for future research on trust in information science and technology.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.363-374

Theme

Information

0.0058892816 = product of:
  0.023557127 = sum of:
    0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023557127 = score(doc=3666,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information

0.0055089183 = product of:
  0.022035673 = sum of:
    0.022035673 = weight(_text_:information in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022035673 = score(doc=665,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the proliferation of new information channels such as the Web, e-mail and wireless, it is becoming increasingly important to understand the impact of these technologies within information-seeking and retrieval contexts. This issue of Aslib Proceedings presents research that begins to address the notion of "information disparity". It aims to weave a common thread between the challenges of reconciling disparate information needs in an environment complicated by fragmented or disparate data sources. This article lists several emerging trends that should begin to challenge traditional notions of our research field.

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Information disparity: research and measurement challenges"

Theme

Information

0.0053210123 = product of:
  0.02128405 = sum of:
    0.02128405 = weight(_text_:information in 4712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02128405 = score(doc=4712,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 4712, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4712)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Colours, icons, graphics, hypertext links and other multimedia elements are variables that affect information search strategies and information seeking behaviour. These variables are culturally constructed and represented and are subject to individual and community interpretation. Hypothesizes that users in different communities (in intercultural or multicultural context) will interpret differently the meanings of the multimedia objects on the Internet. Users' interpretations of multimedia objects may differ from the intentions of the designers. A study in this area is being undertaken

Source

Microcomputers for information management. 12(1995) no.3, S.189-200

Theme

Information

0.0051002675 = product of:
  0.02040107 = sum of:
    0.02040107 = weight(_text_:information in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02040107 = score(doc=1052,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Experiences of time and temporalities in contemporary life are analysed, with Floridi's conception of the infosphere as a central concept. The effects of instantaneous communication and digital information are shown to result not simply in the obvious acceleration of many aspects of life, but in multiple temporalities. The informational spaces of Floridi's hyperhistorical time form a new time-based society, with our informational activities expressed in linear, cyclic, re-cyclic, and iterative processes. Examples from the information sciences, particularly information seeking and "slow information," are given, and an outline model for time literacy is presented.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1159-1169

Theme

Information

0.0050479556 = product of:
  0.020191822 = sum of:
    0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020191822 = score(doc=2946,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information

0.004759258 = product of:
  0.019037032 = sum of:
    0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019037032 = score(doc=333,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Godert notes that, having survived a period where we were drowning in information, we seem to be in a period where we are happily surfing the Internet. This communication considers the social implications of this change in fundamental metaphors about our relationship to information. It is first proposed that, though a paradigm shift has not occured, the significance of the change should not be minimized. The similarities and differences between surfing and drowning are then considered. Questions suggested by these similarities and differences are offered for consideration

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.1, S.92-93

Theme

Information

0.004759258 = product of:
  0.019037032 = sum of:
    0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 6557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019037032 = score(doc=6557,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6557, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6557)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In unserer Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft ist Information ein kostbares Gut. Immer mehr scheinen wir aber in einer wahren Informationsflut unterzugehen. Die Nutzung des Internets als einer modernen Informationsquelle erfordert daher die intensive Auseinandersetzung mit der Qualität der Information. Außerdem stellt sich die Frage, inwieweit sich das Internet neben der Daten- und Informationsbeschaffung auch zu qualitativen Datenerhebung eignet

Source

nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.6, S.321-326

Theme

Information

0.0047219303 = product of:
  0.018887721 = sum of:
    0.018887721 = weight(_text_:information in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018887721 = score(doc=201,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article reviews selected literature related to the credibility of information, including (1) the general markers of credibility, and how different source, message and receiver characteristics affect people's perceptions of information; (2) the impact of information medium on the assessment of credibility; and (3) the assessment of credibility in the context of information presented on the Internet. The objective of the literature review is to synthesize the current state of knowledge in this area, develop new ways to think about how people interact with information presented via the Internet, and suggest next steps for research and practical applications. The review examines empirical evidence, key reviews, and descriptive material related to credibility in general, and in terms of on-line media. A general discussion of credibility and persuasion and a description of recent work on the credibility and persuasiveness of computer-based applications is presented. Finally, the article synthesizes what we have learned from various fields, and proposes a model as a framework for much-needed future research in this area

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.2, S.134-144

Theme

Information

0.004655886 = product of:
  0.018623544 = sum of:
    0.018623544 = weight(_text_:information in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018623544 = score(doc=618,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Examines the challenge for librarians presented with members of the public wanting to make use of the Internet, who may anticipate that finding information on the WWW is a relative straightforward matter. Looks at the kind of guidance needed in using both the Windows operating system and Web browsers. Points out that users will have to learn how to cope with the frustrations inherent to the current realities of the Internet, and specific problems such as the need for absolute precision when entering Web addresses. Reference interviews may be required to determine whether the Web is the best source for the information sought in a particular instance, to help formulate appropriate search strategies, and evaluate and present the information that users retrieve

Theme

Information

0.0044618044 = product of:
  0.017847218 = sum of:
    0.017847218 = weight(_text_:information in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017847218 = score(doc=4477,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This exploratory study contributes to research on relevance assessment by specifying criteria that are used in the judgment of information quality and credibility in Internet discussion forums. To this end, 4,739 messages posted to 160 Finnish discussion threads were analyzed. Of the messages, 20.5% contained explicit judgments of the quality of information and credibility in other messages. In the judgments, the forum participants employed both positive criteria such as validity of information and negative criteria such as dishonesty in argumentation. In the evaluation of the quality of the message's information content, the most frequently used criteria pertained to the usefulness, correctness, and specificity of information. In the judgment of information credibility, the main criteria included the reputation, expertise, and honesty of the author of the message. Since Internet discussion forums tend to emphasize the role of disputational discourse questioning rather than accepting the views presented by others, mainly negative criteria were used in the judgments. The generality of our claims is limited because we chose forums that focused on sensitive and value-laden topics; future work could explore credibility and quality judgment in other forums and forumlike venues such as question and answer sites as well as exploring how quality and credibility judgments interact with other aspects of forum use.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1243-1256

Theme

Information

0.004371658 = product of:
  0.017486632 = sum of:
    0.017486632 = weight(_text_:information in 202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017486632 = score(doc=202,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 202, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=202)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the Web, making judgments of information quality and authority is a difficult task for most users because overall, there is no quality control mechanism. This study examines the problem of the judgment of information quality and cognitive authority by observing people's searching behavior in the Web. Its purpose is to understand the various factors that influence people's judgment of quality and authority in the Web, and the effects of those judgments on selection behaviors. Fifteen scholars from diverse disciplines participated, and data were collected combining verbal protocols during the searches, search logs, and postsearch interviews. It was found that the subjects made two distinct kinds of judgment: predictive judgment, and evaluative judgment. The factors influencing each judgment of quality and authority were identified in terms of characteristics of information objects, characteristics of sources, knowledge, situation, ranking in search output, and general assumption. Implications for Web design that will effectively support people's judgments of quality and authority are also discussed

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.2, S.145-161

Theme

Information

0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=3459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information

0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=2023,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Internet use research has focused on user surveys and novice learner studies, using survey, experimental, and ethnographic methods. They share a focus on user-based categories in the affective and cognitve domains. Information behaviour has an affective component that influences the direction of cognitive processing through hierarchically organized goals, characterized by both an individual and a cultural component. Research in human-computer interaction is evolving a user-centred methodology for system design and instruction that focuses on integrating affective and cognitive user variables to increase productivity, creativity, and human growth

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.11, S.1017-1023

Theme

Information

0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=4285,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information

0.0039907596 = product of:
  0.015963038 = sum of:
    0.015963038 = weight(_text_:information in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015963038 = score(doc=59,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Wie ist Fachinformation einzuschätzen? So richtig als Ware mit einem Markt, mit Produzenten, Anbietern, Händlern usw. Oder ist sie ein öffentliches Gut. Etwas was uns kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt werden sollte? Vor 20 Jahren hätten sich wohl die meisten von uns letzterer Ansicht angeschlossen, obwohl schon damals nur eine bestimmte Informationssorte (fast) kostenlos in Universitätsbibliotheken, Fachzeitschriften, usw. zur Verfügung stand. Heute hat sich die Situation grundsätzlich gewandelt. Dies ist sicherlich Ausdruck der gestiegenen Bedeutung von Information, dem Mehr an Information, das benötigt wird, um zum Beispiel ein Unternehmen in unserer komplexer gewordenen Welt erfolgreich zu führen. Es ist natürlich auch Ausdruck der Tatsache, daß neue Informationsarten wesentlich kurzfristiger zur Verfügung gestellt werden - denken wir nur an den großen Bereich der Fakteninformation - und daß dies wesentlich höhere Kosten verursacht als die früheren 'Darreichungsformen'. Nichtsdestotrotz hält sich hartnäckig der Gedanke, ob nicht vielleicht Fachinformation doch etwas sei, was zumindest sehr billig zu haben sein sollte. Aufschub erhält dieseer Gedanke seit kurzem durch die riesigen Informationsmengen, die per Internet quasi kostenfrei zur Verfügung stehen. Genau auf diesem aktuellem Hintergrund widmet sich der folgende Beitrag der Frage nach dem Charakter von Information: 'Ware oder öffentliches Gut'

Theme

Information