Search (79 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990) 0.01
    0.0067306077 = product of:
      0.02692243 = sum of:
        0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02692243 = score(doc=7510,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 12(1990) no.3, S.251-262
  2. Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980) 0.01
    0.006182458 = product of:
      0.024729831 = sum of:
        0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024729831 = score(doc=1329,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  3. Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995) 0.01
    0.006182458 = product of:
      0.024729831 = sum of:
        0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024729831 = score(doc=521,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the methods of calculating the information content of images, with particular reference to the information content of printed and photographic images; and printed and television images
  4. Renouf, A.: Making sense of text : automated approaches to meaning extraction (1993) 0.01
    0.0058892816 = product of:
      0.023557127 = sum of:
        0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 7111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023557127 = score(doc=7111,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7111, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7111)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
  5. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.01
    0.0051002675 = product of:
      0.02040107 = sum of:
        0.02040107 = weight(_text_:information in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02040107 = score(doc=5828,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
    Source
    Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
  6. Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
  7. Kremer-Marietti, A.: Thematic analysis (1986) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.41, [=Suppl.6]
  8. Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
  9. Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
  10. Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.105-136
  11. Fairthorne, R.A.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1969) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 4(1969), S.73-110
  12. Berinstein, P.: Moving multimedia : the information value in images (1997) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=2489,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the role of pictures in information communication, comparing the way it conveys information with text. Categorises the purposes of images as conveyors of information: the instructional image, the documentary image, the location image, the graphical representation of numbers, the concepts image, the image making the unseen visible, the image as a surrogate for an object or document, the decorative image, the image as a statement, the strong image and the emotional image. Gives examples of how the value of images is being recognised and of how they can be used well
  13. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.00
    0.004655886 = product of:
      0.018623544 = sum of:
        0.018623544 = weight(_text_:information in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018623544 = score(doc=946,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1092-1103
  14. Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008) 0.00
    0.004371658 = product of:
      0.017486632 = sum of:
        0.017486632 = weight(_text_:information in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017486632 = score(doc=1958,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1383-1392
  15. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.0042066295 = product of:
      0.016826518 = sum of:
        0.016826518 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016826518 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
  16. Krause, J.: Principles of content analysis for information retrieval systems : an overview (1996) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=6032,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Theories of aboutness and theories of subject analysis and of related concepts such as topicality are often isolated from each other in the literature of information science (IS) and related disciplines. In IS it is important to consider the nature and meaning of these concepts, which is closely related to theoretical and metatheoretical issues in information retrieval (IR). A theory of IR must specify which concepts should be regarded as synonymous concepts and explain how the meaning of the nonsynonymous concepts should be defined
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.774-778
    Theme
    Information
  18. Fremery, W. De; Buckland, M.K.: Context, relevance, and labor (2022) 0.00
    0.0039907596 = product of:
      0.015963038 = sum of:
        0.015963038 = weight(_text_:information in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015963038 = score(doc=4240,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Since information science concerns the transmission of records, it concerns context. The transmission of documents ensures their arrival in new contexts. Documents and their copies are spread across times and places. The amount of labor required to discover and retrieve relevant documents is also formulated by context. Thus, any serious consideration of communication and of information technologies quickly leads to a concern with context, relevance, and labor. Information scientists have developed many theories of context, relevance, and labor but not a framework for organizing them and describing their relationship with one another. We propose the words context and relevance can be used to articulate a useful framework for considering the diversity of approaches to context and relevance in information science, as well as their relations with each other and with labor.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.9, S.1268-1278
  19. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.00
    0.0036430482 = product of:
      0.014572193 = sum of:
        0.014572193 = weight(_text_:information in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014572193 = score(doc=4888,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
  20. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a computer-aided user-system dialogue based on an analysis of users' search behaviour (1984) 0.00
    0.0035694437 = product of:
      0.014277775 = sum of:
        0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014277775 = score(doc=1044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Social science information studies. 4(1984), S.167-183

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 5
  • More… Less…