Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Austin, D.: Development of a new general classification : a progress report (1969) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information scientist. 3(1969) no.3, S.95-115
  2. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=4227,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present three fundamental, interrelated approaches to support multiple access paths to each terminal object in information hierarchies: faceted classification, faceted search, and web directories with embedded symbolic links. This survey aims to demonstrate how each approach supports users who seek information from multiple perspectives. We achieve this by exploring each approach, the relationships between these approaches, including tradeoffs, and how they can be used in concert, while focusing on a core set of hypermedia elements common to all. This approach provides a foundation from which to study, understand, and synthesize applications which employ these techniques. This survey does not aim to be comprehensive, but rather focuses on thematic issues.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  3. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.243-284
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.00
    0.004121639 = product of:
      0.016486555 = sum of:
        0.016486555 = weight(_text_:information in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016486555 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the origin and evolution of the Information Coding Classification (ICC); its theoretical basis, and structure and advantageous attributes for organizing knowledge. Pleads that the considerable work already done on the system should be taken up and developed by interested research groups through collaborative effort. Concludes with some thoughts on the future of knowledge organization for information retrieval and other applications
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Eds.: K.S. Raghavan u. K.N. Prasad
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.00
    0.004121639 = product of:
      0.016486555 = sum of:
        0.016486555 = weight(_text_:information in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016486555 = score(doc=4057,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag umfasst eine Einführung in das Verständnis der Information Coding Classification (ICC), einer Universalklassifikation von Wissensgebieten. Er enthält (1) Entstehungsgeschichte (1970 bis 1977), (2) ihre Prinzipien: Begriffe, Begriffsbeziehungen, Notation, Hauptklassen als Objektbereiche in Integrationsstufen, Systemstellenplan als Systematifikator mit neun Aspekten zur Untergliederung, Verbindungsmöglichkeiten mit anderen Systemen, Systemstellen zur Darstellung von Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. (3) Erläuterung ihres Inhalts und kurze Erörterung der Probleme bei der Konzeption und Erarbeitung.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
  6. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.00
    0.0039907596 = product of:
      0.015963038 = sum of:
        0.015963038 = weight(_text_:information in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015963038 = score(doc=831,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
  7. Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006) 0.00
    0.0036430482 = product of:
      0.014572193 = sum of:
        0.014572193 = weight(_text_:information in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014572193 = score(doc=2874,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: UK library & information schools: UCL SLAIS.
  8. Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969) 0.00
    0.0035694437 = product of:
      0.014277775 = sum of:
        0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014277775 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  9. Austin, D.: ¬The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification (1969) 0.00
    0.0035694437 = product of:
      0.014277775 = sum of:
        0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014277775 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  10. Wilson, T.D.: ¬The work of the British Classification Research Group (1972) 0.00
    0.0035694437 = product of:
      0.014277775 = sum of:
        0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014277775 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Contributions in librarianship and information science; 3
  11. Austin, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems : some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973 (1979) 0.00
    0.0029745363 = product of:
      0.011898145 = sum of:
        0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011898145 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975. Ed. by A. Neelameghan
  12. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.00
    0.0029745363 = product of:
      0.011898145 = sum of:
        0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011898145 = score(doc=2793,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Computers have transformed from single isolated devices to entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange. Consequently, support in the exchange of data, information, and knowledge is becoming the key issue in computer technology today. The increasing volume of data available on the Web makes information retrieval a tedious and difficult task. Researchers are now exploring the possibility of creating a semantic web, in which meaning is made explicit, allowing machines to process and integrate web resources intelligently. The vision of the semantic web introduces the next generation of the Web by establishing a layer of machine-understandable data. The success of the semantic web depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data, which will depend on web ontology. The faceted approach towards analyzing and representing knowledge given by S R Ranganathan would be useful in this regard. Ontology development in different fields is one such area where this approach given by Ranganathan could be applied. This paper presents a case of developing ontology for the field of banking.
    Source
    Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.281-285
  13. Milonas, E.: ¬The use of facets in Web search engines 0.00
    0.0029446408 = product of:
      0.011778563 = sum of:
        0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 3545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011778563 = score(doc=3545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3545)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web consists of a plethora of information that a Web searcher can retrieve via Web search engines such as Google. These Web search engines display an insurmountable amount of information in a seemingly unorganized linear format. Recently, some Web search engines have incorporated facets or terms alongside the linear display allowing the searcher the ability to narrow search results. The goal of this study is to examine the use of facets in these Web search engines.
  14. Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017) 0.00
    0.0029446408 = product of:
      0.011778563 = sum of:
        0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011778563 = score(doc=3614,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
  15. Ghosh, S.; Panigrahi, P.: Use of Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic approach in developing a domain ontology in library and information science (2015) 0.00
    0.0025760243 = product of:
      0.010304097 = sum of:
        0.010304097 = weight(_text_:information in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010304097 = score(doc=2798,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Classification is the basis of knowledge organization. Ontology, a comparatively new concept used as a tool for knowledge organization, establishes connections between terms and concepts enhancing the scope and usefulness of library classification. Ranganathan had invented the strong theory of the analytico-synthetic method in classification and devised Colon Classification. In this study a domain ontology on library and information science has been developed by implementing Raganathan's faceted approach of classification. The hierarchical relationships among terms have been established primarily keeping conformity with that of Ranganathan's Colon Classification (7th edition). But to accommodate new vocabularies, DDC 23rd edition and UDC Standard edition are consulted. The Protégé ontology editor has been used. The study carefully examines the steps in which the analytico-synthetic method have been followed. Ranganathan's Canon of Characteristics and its relevant Canons have been followed for defining the class-subclass hierarchy. It concludes by identifying the drawbacks as well as the merits faced while developing the ontology. This paper proves the relevance and importance of Ranganathan's philosophy in developing ontology based knowledge organization.
    Source
    Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.274-280
  16. Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=3755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  17. Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The Colon Classification : a few considerations on its future (2015) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.231-238
  18. Panigrahi, P.: Ranganathan and Dewey in hierarchical subject classification : some similarities (2015) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.265-267
  19. Satija, M.P.: Save the national heritage : revise the Colon Classification (2015) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.239-248
  20. Rout, R.; Panigrahi, P.: Revisiting Ranganathan's canons in online cataloguing environment (2015) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 2796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=2796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2796)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.286-289