Search (297 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Kruk, S.R.; McDaniel, B.: Conclusions: The future of semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.04
    0.04012645 = product of:
      0.0802529 = sum of:
        0.0719242 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0719242 = score(doc=3372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.39897648 = fieldWeight in 3372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3372)
        0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 3372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008328702 = score(doc=3372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3372)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/p77265/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  2. Kruk, S.R.; McDaniel, B.: Goals of semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.04
    0.037963547 = product of:
      0.07592709 = sum of:
        0.061649315 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061649315 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.34197983 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
        0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014277775 = score(doc=3378,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Digital libraries have become commodity in the current world of Internet. More and more information is produced, and more and more non-digital information is being rendered available. The new, more user friendly, community-oriented technologies used throughout the Internet are raising the bar of expectations. Digital libraries cannot stand still with their technologies; if not for the sake of handling rapidly growing amount and diversity of information, they must provide for better user experience matching and overgrowing standards set by the industry. The next generation of digital libraries combine technological solutions, such as P2P, SOA, or Grid, with recent research on semantics and social networks. These solutions are put into practice to answer a variety of requirements imposed on digital libraries.
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/r724510536736471/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  3. Kruk, S.R.; Cygan, M.; Gzella, A.; Woroniecki, T.; Dabrowski, M.: JeromeDL: the social semantic digital library (2009) 0.04
    0.037007116 = product of:
      0.07401423 = sum of:
        0.061649315 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061649315 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.34197983 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
        0.012364916 = weight(_text_:information in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012364916 = score(doc=3383,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The initial research on semantic digital libraries resulted in the design and implementation of JeromeDL; current research on online social networking and information discovery delivered new sets of features that were implemented in JeromeDL. Eventually, this digital library has been redesigned to follow the architecture of a social semantic digital library. JeromeDL describes each resource using three types of metadata: structure, bibliographic and community. It delivers services leveraging each of these information types. Annotations based on the structure and legacy metadata, and bibliographic ontology are rendered to the users in one, mixed, representation of library resources. Community annotations are managed by separate services, such as social semantic collaborative filtering or blogging component
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g843877721177404/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  4. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.04
    0.035872612 = product of:
      0.071745224 = sum of:
        0.061649315 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061649315 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.34197983 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
        0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010095911 = score(doc=3387,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g4558t1mxl083805/.
  5. Kruk, S.R.; Westerki, A.; Kruk, E.: Architecture of semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.03
    0.0343941 = product of:
      0.0687882 = sum of:
        0.061649315 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061649315 = score(doc=3379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.34197983 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=3379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g00245883u2555n3/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  6. Soergel, D.: Digital libraries and knowledge organization (2009) 0.03
    0.032338478 = product of:
      0.064676955 = sum of:
        0.051374428 = weight(_text_:digitale in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051374428 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2849832 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.013302531 = weight(_text_:information in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013302531 = score(doc=672,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter describes not so much what digital libraries are but what digital libraries with semantic support could and should be. It discusses the nature of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and how KOS can support digital library users. It projects a vision for designers to make and for users to demand better digital libraries. What is a digital library? The term \Digital Library" (DL) is used to refer to a range of systems, from digital object and metadata repositories, reference-linking systems, archives, and content management systems to complex systems that integrate advanced digital library services and support for research and practice communities. A DL may offer many technology-enabled functions and services that support users, both as information producers and as information users. Many of these functions appear in information systems that would not normally be considered digital libraries, making boundaries even more blurry. Instead of pursuing the hopeless quest of coming up with the definition of digital library, we present a framework that allows a clear and somewhat standardized description of any information system so that users can select the system(s) that best meet their requirements. Section 2 gives a broad outline for more detail see the DELOS DL Reference Model.
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/p416374353100075/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  7. Breslin, J.G.: Social semantic information spaces (2009) 0.03
    0.029893843 = product of:
      0.059787687 = sum of:
        0.051374428 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051374428 = score(doc=3377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2849832 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
        0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008413259 = score(doc=3377,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The structural and syntactic web put in place in the early 90s is still much the same as what we use today: resources (web pages, files, etc.) connected by untyped hyperlinks. By untyped, we mean that there is no easy way for a computer to figure out what a link between two pages means - for example, on the W3C website, there are hundreds of links to the various organisations that are registered members of the association, but there is nothing explicitly saying that the link is to an organisation that is a "member of" the W3C or what type of organisation is represented by the link. On John's work page, he links to many papers he has written, but it does not explicitly say that he is the author of those papers or that he wrote such-and-such when he was working at a particular university. In fact, the Web was envisaged to be much more, as one can see from the image in Fig. 1 which is taken from Tim Berners Lee's original outline for the Web in 1989, entitled "Information Management: A Proposal". In this, all the resources are connected by links describing the type of relationships, e.g. "wrote", "describe", "refers to", etc. This is a precursor to the Semantic Web which we will come back to later.
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/l782q08436312x04/.
  8. Haslhofer, B.; Knezevié, P.: ¬The BRICKS digital library infrastructure (2009) 0.03
    0.029893843 = product of:
      0.059787687 = sum of:
        0.051374428 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051374428 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.2849832 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
        0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008413259 = score(doc=3384,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Service-oriented architectures, and the wider acceptance of decentralized peer-to-peer architectures enable the transition from integrated, centrally controlled systems to federated and dynamic configurable systems. The benefits for the individual service providers and users are robustness of the system, independence of central authorities and flexibility in the usage of services. This chapter provides details of the European project BRICKS, which aims at enabling integrated access to distributed resources in the Cultural Heritage domain. The target audience is broad and heterogeneous and involves cultural heritage and educational institutions, the research community, industry, and the general public. The project idea is motivated by the fact that the amount of digital information and digitized content is continuously increasing but still much effort has to be expended to discover and access it. The reasons for such a situation are heterogeneous data formats, restricted access, proprietary access interfaces, etc. Typical usage scenarios are integrated queries among several knowledge resource, e.g. to discover all Italian artifacts from the Renaissance in European museums. Another example is to follow the life cycle of historic documents, whose physical copies are distributed all over Europe. A standard method for integrated access is to place all available content and metadata in a central place. Unfortunately, such a solution requires a quite powerful and costly infrastructure if the volume of data is large. Considerations of cost optimization are highly important for Cultural Heritage institutions, especially if they are funded from public money. Therefore, better usage of the existing resources, i.e. a decentralized/P2P approach promises to deliver a significantly less costly system,and does not mean sacrificing too much on the performance side.
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/uw35466419356165/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  9. Semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.02
    0.024671411 = product of:
      0.049342822 = sum of:
        0.041099545 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041099545 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.22798656 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
        0.008243278 = weight(_text_:information in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008243278 = score(doc=3371,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and relationships for digital repositories. Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of both today's possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often unstructured data.
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction to Digital Libraries and Semantic Web: Introduction / Bill McDaniel and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Digital Libraries and Knowledge Organization / Dagobert Soergel - Semantic Web and Ontologies / Marcin Synak, Maciej Dabrowski and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Social Semantic Information Spaces / John G. Breslin A Vision of Semantic Digital Libraries: Goals of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel - Architecture of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Westerki and Ewelina Kruk - Long-time Preservation / Markus Reis Ontologies for Semantic Digital Libraries: Bibliographic Ontology / Maciej Dabrowski, Macin Synak and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Community-aware Ontologies / Slawomir Grzonkowski, Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Gzella, Jakub Demczuk and Bill McDaniel Prototypes of Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromeDL: The Social Semantic Digital Library / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Mariusz Cygan, Adam Gzella, Tomasz Woroniecki and Maciej Dabrowski - The BRICKS Digital Library Infrastructure / Bernhard Haslhofer and Predrag Knezevié - Semantics in Greenstone / Annika Hinze, George Buchanan, David Bainbridge and Ian Witten Building the Future - Semantic Digital Libraries in Use: Hyperbooks / Gilles Falquet, Luka Nerima and Jean-Claude Ziswiler - Semantic Digital Libraries for Archiving / Bill McDaniel - Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Ewelina Kruk and Katarzyna Stankiewicz - Conclusions: The Future of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel
    Footnote
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/p77265/.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  10. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.02
    0.020549772 = product of:
      0.08219909 = sum of:
        0.08219909 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08219909 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.45597312 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g795215740578203/.
  11. Grzonkowski, S.; Kruk, S.R.; Gzella, A.; Demczuk, J.; McDaniel, B.: Community-aware ontologies (2009) 0.02
    0.020549772 = product of:
      0.08219909 = sum of:
        0.08219909 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08219909 = score(doc=3382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.45597312 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die digitale Ausgabe unter: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u6642u0u41648pn3/.
  12. Quillian, M.R.: Semantic memory (1968) 0.01
    0.0067306077 = product of:
      0.02692243 = sum of:
        0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02692243 = score(doc=1478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Semantic information processing. Ed.: M. Minsky
    Theme
    Information
  13. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.006182458 = product of:
      0.024729831 = sum of:
        0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024729831 = score(doc=987,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.
    Content
    Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Information organization
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Information retrieval
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Information organization
    Information Retrieval
  14. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.01
    0.0059490725 = product of:
      0.02379629 = sum of:
        0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02379629 = score(doc=2257,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
    LCSH
    Information resources
    Information organization
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    RSWK
    Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Information resources
    Information organization
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
  15. Teskey, F.N.: Enriched knowledge representation for information retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.0058892816 = product of:
      0.023557127 = sum of:
        0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023557127 = score(doc=698,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we identify the need for a new theory of information. An information model is developed which distinguishes between data, as directly observable facts, information, as structured collections of data, and knowledge as methods of using information. The model is intended to support a wide range of information systems. In the paper we develop the use of the model for a semantic information retrieval system using the concept of semantic categories. The likely benefits of this area discussed, though as yet no detailed evaluation has been conducted.
    Source
    SIGIR'87: Proceedings of the 10th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
  16. Information and communication technologies : international conference; proceedings / ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7 - 9, 2010 (2010) 0.01
    0.0055089183 = product of:
      0.022035673 = sum of:
        0.022035673 = weight(_text_:information in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022035673 = score(doc=4784,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies held in Kochi, Kerala, India in September 2010.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information systems
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; vol.101
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information systems
  17. Semantic applications (2018) 0.01
    0.0053624217 = product of:
      0.021449687 = sum of:
        0.021449687 = weight(_text_:information in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021449687 = score(doc=5204,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Introduction.- Ontology Development.- Compliance using Metadata.- Variety Management for Big Data.- Text Mining in Economics.- Generation of Natural Language Texts.- Sentiment Analysis.- Building Concise Text Corpora from Web Contents.- Ontology-Based Modelling of Web Content.- Personalized Clinical Decision Support for Cancer Care.- Applications of Temporal Conceptual Semantic Systems.- Context-Aware Documentation in the Smart Factory.- Knowledge-Based Production Planning for Industry 4.0.- Information Exchange in Jurisdiction.- Supporting Automated License Clearing.- Managing cultural assets: Implementing typical cultural heritage archive's usage scenarios via Semantic Web technologies.- Semantic Applications for Process Management.- Domain-Specific Semantic Search Applications.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval
    Management information systems
    Information Systems Applications (incl. Internet)
    Management of Computing and Information Systems
    Information Storage and Retrieval
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Information Retrieval
    Information storage and retrieval
    Management information systems
    Information Systems Applications (incl. Internet)
    Management of Computing and Information Systems
    Information Storage and Retrieval
  18. Fonseca, F.: ¬The double role of ontologies in information science research (2007) 0.01
    0.0050479556 = product of:
      0.020191822 = sum of:
        0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020191822 = score(doc=277,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontology refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.786-793
  19. Yi, M.: Information organization and retrieval using a topic maps-based ontology : results of a task-based evaluation (2008) 0.01
    0.0050479556 = product of:
      0.020191822 = sum of:
        0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020191822 = score(doc=2369,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As information becomes richer and more complex, alternative information-organization methods are needed to more effectively and efficiently retrieve information from various systems, including the Web. The objective of this study is to explore how a Topic Maps-based ontology approach affects users' searching performance. Forty participants participated in a task-based evaluation where two dependent variables, recall and search time, were measured. The results of this study indicate that a Topic Maps-based ontology information retrieval (TOIR) system has a significant and positive effect on both recall and search time, compared to a thesaurus-based information retrieval (TIR) system. These results suggest that the inclusion of a Topic Maps-based ontology is a beneficial approach to take when designing information retrieval systems.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1898-1911
  20. Zhang, L.: Linking information through function (2014) 0.01
    0.0050479556 = product of:
      0.020191822 = sum of:
        0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 1526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020191822 = score(doc=1526,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1526, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1526)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    How information resources can be meaningfully related has been addressed in contexts from bibliographic entries to hyperlinks and, more recently, linked data. The genre structure and relationships among genre structure constituents shed new light on organizing information by purpose or function. This study examines the relationships among a set of functional units previously constructed in a taxonomy, each of which is a chunk of information embedded in a document and is distinct in terms of its communicative function. Through a card-sort study, relationships among functional units were identified with regard to their occurrence and function. The findings suggest that a group of functional units can be identified, collocated, and navigated by particular relationships. Understanding how functional units are related to each other is significant in linking information pieces in documents to support finding, aggregating, and navigating information in a distributed information environment.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.11, S.2293-2305

Years

Types

  • a 220
  • el 75
  • m 24
  • s 12
  • x 12
  • n 7
  • p 2
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications