Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999) 0.01 
    0.0058892816 = product of:
  0.023557127 = sum of:
    0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023557127 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
  2. Kuhlen, R.: Abstracts, abstracting : intellektuelle und maschinelle Verfahren (1990) 0.00 
    0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=2333,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  3. Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997) 0.00 
    0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=430,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to determine how easy and quickly research articles in library and information science could be retrieved from the LISA Plus CD-ROM database. Results show that the search with the descriptor 'research' retrieves all types of articles and it is necessary to read through every abstract to locate the research articles. The introductory sentence of a substantial number of abstracts hinder the process of identification since the sentence provides such information as the conference where the paper was presented, the special issue or the section of a periodical where the article is located; or obvious background information. Suggests measures whereby research articles can be identified easily and rapidly
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
  4. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.00 
    0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
  5. Kuhlen, R.: Abstracts, abstracting : intellektuelle und maschinelle Verfahren (1997) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 7800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=7800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 7800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7800)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 4. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a
  6. Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992) 0.00 
    0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=2536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
  7. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00 
    0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.170-173
  8. Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=3677,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Compares formats and linguistic devices of German abstracts and their English equivalents, written by German medical scholars to English native speakers. The source is 20 abstracts taken from German medical journals representing different degrees of specialism. The analysis includes: the overall length of articles/abstracts; the representation/arrangement of sections; the linguistic devices. Results show no correlation between the length of articles and the length of abstracts. In contrast to native speaking author abstracts, 'background information' predominated in the structure of the studied German non-native speaker abstracts, whereas 'purpose of study' and 'conclusions' were not clearly stated. In linguistic terms, the German abstracts frequently contained lexical hegdes, complex and enumerating sentence structure; passive voice and post tense as well as various types of linking structures
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
  9. O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=85,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Clear guidelines have been provided for structuring the abstracts of original research and review articles and, in the past 10 years, several major medical periodicals have adopted the policy of including such abstracts with all their articles. A review of the literature reveals that proponents claim that structured abstracts enhance peer review, improve information retrieval, and ease critical appraisal. However, some periodicals have not adopted structured abstracts and their opponents claim that they make articles longer and harder to read and restrict author originality. Concludes that previous research on structured abstracts focused on how closely they followed prescribed structure and include salient points of the full text, rather than their role in increasing the usefulness of the article
  10. Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=3699,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The library and information science (LIS) literature on abstracting makes little mention about abstracting conducted in the corporate / business environment, whereas the business literature suggests that abstarcting is a very important component of business writing. Examines a variety of publications from LIS and business in order to compare and contrast their approaches to the following aspects of abstracting: definitions of abstracts; types of abstracts; purpose of abstracts; and writing of abstracts. Summarises the results of the examination which revealed a number of similarities, differences, and inadequacies in the ways in which both fields approach abstracting. Concludes that both fields need to develop more detailed guidelines concerning the cognitive process of abstracting and suggests improvements to the training af absractors based on these findings
  11. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarising text for intelligent communication : results of the Dagstuhl seminar (1994) 0.00 
    0.0025239778 = product of:
  0.010095911 = sum of:
    0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 8867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010095911 = score(doc=8867,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 8867, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8867)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    As a result of the transition to full-text storage, multimedia and networking, information systems are becoming more efficient but at the same time more difficult to use, in particular because users are confronted with information volumes that increasingly exceed individual processing capacities. Consequently, there is an increase in the demand for user aids such as summarising techniques. Against this background, the interdisciplinary Dagstuhl Seminar 'Summarising Text for Intelligent Communication' (Dec. 1993) outlined the academic state of the art with regard to summarising (abstracting) and proposed future directions for research and system development. Research is currently shifting its attention from text summarising to summarising states of affairs. Recycling solutions are put forward in order to satisfy short-term needs for summarisation products. In the medium and long term, it is necessary to devise concepts and methods of intelligent summarising which have a better formal and empirical grounding and a more modular organisation
  12. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    British librarianship and information work 1986-1990. Ed. by D. Bromley and A.M. Allott
  13. Neumann-Duscha, I.: Über die Qualität von Referaten (1990) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die Qualität der Dokumentenanlyse entscheidet über die Wirksamkeit eines Dokumentationsvorhabens, denn Auswahl und Darstellung von Informationselementen bilden die Grundlage zum Wiederfinden des dokumentierten Wissens. Kurzreferate informieren über den Inhalt einer Veröffentlichung. Verschiedene Typen von Inhaltsangaben werden entsprechend der DIN 1426 vorgestellt, Vorschriften und Anweisungen an Referate werden analysiert und die Bewertung der Qualität von Kurzreferaten diskutiert. Das zunehmende Wissen über den Aufbau und das Information Retrieval von Faktendatenbanken führt zu der Schlußfolgerung, daß über die verbale Kurzdarstellung des Dokumenteninhalts hinaus Fakten extrahiert und in speziellen Datenbanken gespeichert werden sollten
  14. Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.225-234
  15. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
  16. Monday, I.: ¬Les processus cognitifs et la redaction de résumes (1996) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 6917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=6917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6917)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Attempts to explain the intellectual and cognitive processes which govern the understanding and structure of a text, on the one hand, and writing a summary or abstract on the other, based on the literature of information science, education, cognitive psychology and psychiatry
  17. Booth, A.; O'Rouke, A.J.: ¬The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE (1997) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.359-364
  19. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0021033147 = product of:
  0.008413259 = sum of:
    0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008413259 = score(doc=7673,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
  20. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995) 0.00 
    0.0020821756 = product of:
  0.008328702 = sum of:
    0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008328702 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674

Authors

Languages

Themes