-
McGill, M.J.; Huitfeldt, J.: Experimental techniques of information retrieval (1979)
0.01
0.0058892816 = product of:
0.023557127 = sum of:
0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023557127 = score(doc=279,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 14(1979), S.93-128
-
Cooper, W.S.: ¬On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness, revisited (1973)
0.01
0.0050479556 = product of:
0.020191822 = sum of:
0.020191822 = weight(_text_:information in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020191822 = score(doc=1930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.191-204.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1973), S.87-100
-
Cooper, W.S.: ¬The paradoxal role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness (1976)
0.00
0.004759258 = product of:
0.019037032 = sum of:
0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019037032 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.367-375
-
King, D.W.; Bryant, E.C.: ¬The evaluation of information services and products (1971)
0.00
0.0042066295 = product of:
0.016826518 = sum of:
0.016826518 = weight(_text_:information in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016826518 = score(doc=4157,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Washington : Information resources press
-
Byrne, J.R.: Relative effectiveness of titles, abstracts, and subject headings for machine retrieval from the COMPENDEX services (1975)
0.00
0.0020821756 = product of:
0.008328702 = sum of:
0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008328702 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26(1975), S.223-229
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Progress in documentation : Information retrieval test collection (1976)
0.00
0.0020821756 = product of:
0.008328702 = sum of:
0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 4161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008328702 = score(doc=4161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4161)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Bhattacharyya, K.: ¬The effectiveness of natural language in science indexing and retrieval (1974)
0.00
0.0017847219 = product of:
0.0071388874 = sum of:
0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 2628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071388874 = score(doc=2628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2628)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the implications of the findings of evaluative tests regarding the retrieval performance of natural language in various subject fields. It suggests parallel investigations into the structure of natural language, with particular reference to terminology, as used in the different branches of basic science. The criteria for defining the terminological consistency of a subject are formulated and a measure suggested for determining the degree of terminological consistency. The terminological and information structures of specific disciplines such as, chemistry, physics, botany, zoology, and geology; the circumstances in which terms originate; and the efforts made by the international scientific community to standardize the terminology in their respective disciplines - are examined in detail. This investigation shows why and how an artificially created scientific language finds it impossible to keep pace with current developments and thus points to the source of strength of natural language
