Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × author_ss:"Rada, R."
  1. Rada, R.: Knowledge-sparse and knowledge-rich learning in information retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.0067306077 = product of:
      0.02692243 = sum of:
        0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 5146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02692243 = score(doc=5146,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5146, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5146)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 23(1987) no.3, S.195-210
  2. Rada, R.: Writing and reading hypertext : an overview (1989) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989), S.164-171
  3. McMath, C.; Tamararu, B.; Rada, R.: Graphical interface to thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1988) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Rada, R.; Bicknell, E.: Ranking documents with a thesaurus (1989) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 6908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=6908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6908)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989) no.5, S.304-310
  5. McMath, C.F.; Tamaru, R.S.; Rada, R.: ¬A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1989) 0.00
    0.004164351 = product of:
      0.016657405 = sum of:
        0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016657405 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Rada, R.: Connecting and evaluating thesauri : issues and cases (1987) 0.00
    0.0020821756 = product of:
      0.008328702 = sum of:
        0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008328702 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Connecting and evaluating thesauri is an important task for the systematic development of better information retrieval systems. Connecting thesauri includes not only determining when terms in different thesauri are the same but also determining what kinds of relationships can be transferred from one thesaurus to another. This paper first presents issues in connecting and evaluating thesauri. Various experiments in connecting a particular thesaurus, the Medical Subject Headings, with other medical thesauri are described. In these experiments, similar terms in two thesauri are recognized and then differences in two thesauri are exploited to create more powerful thesauri. Part of the evaluation requires the thesaurus to support automatic indexing and retrieving of documents