Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0062465263 = product of:
  0.024986105 = sum of:
    0.024986105 = weight(_text_:information in 7747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024986105 = score(doc=7747,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.40730494 = fieldWeight in 7747, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7747)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

We discuss information by attempting to operationalize it using: (1) Dervin and Nilan's idea that information is a subjective construct rather than an objective thing; (2) Brookes's idea that information is that which modifies knowledge structure; and (3) Neisser's idea that perception is top-down or schemata driven to the point of paradoxon. De Mey, Minsky's theorem of frames, and top-down and bottom-up models from reading theory are discussed. We conclude that information must be rare because only rare information can modify knowledge structure at its upper levels, and that to modify knowledge structure at its upper levels (its essence) information may have to enter the perception cycle in 2 stages

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.7, S.465-476

Theme

Information

0.006182458 = product of:
  0.024729831 = sum of:
    0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 6431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024729831 = score(doc=6431,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 6431, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6431)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.709-720

0.006182458 = product of:
  0.024729831 = sum of:
    0.024729831 = weight(_text_:information in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024729831 = score(doc=6432,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.721-731

0.0059192525 = product of:
  0.02367701 = sum of:
    0.02367701 = weight(_text_:information in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02367701 = score(doc=3675,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article is about the mental coding processes involved in the flow of 'information' when the user is interacting with an 'enabling' information retrieval system. An 'enabling' IR system is designed to stimulate the user's grasping towards a higher understanding of the information need / problem / task that brought the user to the IR system. C. Shannon's (1949/1959) model of the flow of information and K.R. Popper's (1975) 3 worlds concept are used to diagram the flow of information between the user and system when the user receives a stimulating massage, with particluar emphasis on the decoding and encoding operations involved as the user processes the message. The key difference between the model of information flow proposed here and the linear transmission, receiver-oriented model now in use is that we assume that users of a truly interactive, 'enabling' IR system are primarily message senders, not passive receivers of the message, because they must create a new message back to the system, absed on a reconceptualization of their information need, while they are 'online' interacting with the system

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.6, S.544-552

Theme

Information

0.0058892816 = product of:
  0.023557127 = sum of:
    0.023557127 = weight(_text_:information in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023557127 = score(doc=4069,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Shannon's theory of communication is discussed from the point of view of his concept of uncertainty. It is suggested that there are two information concepts in Shannon, two different uncertainties, and at least two different entropy concepts. Information science focuses on the uncertainty associated with the transmission of the signal rather than the uncertainty associated with the selection of a message from a set of possible messages. The author believes the latter information concept, which is from the sender's point of view, has more to say to information science about what information is than the former, which is from the receiver's point of view and is mainly concerned with 'noise' reduction

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.4, S.204-211

Theme

Information

0.005643786 = product of:
  0.022575144 = sum of:
    0.022575144 = weight(_text_:information in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022575144 = score(doc=2051,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Using Bertram Brookes fundamental equation, sets out a method for calculating the information content of an information process. The knowledge structure variables in the Brookes' equation are operationalized, following principles set out in Claude Shannon's mathematical theory of communication. The set of 'a priori' alternatives and the 'a priori' probabilities assigned to each member of the set by the person undergoing the information process is the operational definition of the variable K(S) from the fundamental equation, which represented the person's knowledge structure before the information process takes place. The set of the a posteriori alternatives and the revised probabilities assigned to each member of the set by the person undergoing the information process is the operational definition of the Brookes variable which is the person's knowledge structure after the information process take place. Gives an example of an information process from a recent archeological discovery

Source

Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.6, S.715-726

0.004759258 = product of:
  0.019037032 = sum of:
    0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 6918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019037032 = score(doc=6918,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6918, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Proposes a reference interview strategy that will allow the reference librarian to: efficiently assess the information need of undergraduates undertaking a social science assignment, label the information need, and assign the most appropriate online search strategy to satisfy this need

Source

Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.709-717

0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=627,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 627, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=627)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

When assisting undergraduate students in accessing materials, academic librarians must balance the task of conducting reference interviews with instructing students on how to use databases (OPACs, CD-ROM and online databases). Presents a method for connecting these tasks via the construction of a search strategy which is wholly dependent on the user's information needs. Using this method, the librarian assesses and explicitly labels the student's information need (using a diagnostoc tool based on Kuhlthau's and Taylor's concept of 'focus'), then assigns the most appropriate online search strategy for the satisfaction of this need