Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Schwartz, W.: EROMM und alte Drucke (2004) 0.02 
    0.020549772 = product of:
  0.08219909 = sum of:
    0.08219909 = weight(_text_:digitale in 3004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08219909 = score(doc=3004,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.45597312 = fieldWeight in 3004, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3004)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Vor zehn Jahren ging die EROMM-Datenbank online. Begonnen hatte diese europäische Gemeinschaftsinitiative als Bibliotheksprojekt der EU mit dem Ziel, einen zentralen Nachweis von Sicherheitsverfilmungen aufzubauen. Seitdem hat EROMM sich zu dem internationalen Nachweis- und Koordinationsinstrument für Bestandssicherung auf Sekundärmedien entwickelt. Heute enthält die Datenbank die bibliographischen Daten für mehr als 2,5 Millionen Mikroformmaster und digitale Master, die aus Ländern in Europa, Nord- und Lateinamerika gemeldet werden.
  2. Bürger, T.; Fabian, C.; Schaab, R.; Schneider-Kempf, B.; Schnelling, H.; Thaller, M.: ¬Das VD 18 : eine Einladung ins 18. Jahrhundert (2008) 0.02 
    0.020549772 = product of:
  0.08219909 = sum of:
    0.08219909 = weight(_text_:digitale in 4588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08219909 = score(doc=4588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.45597312 = fieldWeight in 4588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4588)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag informiert über das geplante Vorhaben VD 18 (Verzeichnis der im deutschen Sprachraum erschienenen Drucke des 18. Jahrhunderts), seine Vorgeschichte und die vorgesehene Struktur des Projekts. Im Unterschied zu gleichermaßen bezeichneten Projekten für frühere Jahrhunderte wird das VD 18 die Volltext-Digitalisierung aller verzeichneten Drucke bieten. Für den deutschen Sprachraum wird das VD 18 damit die digitale Bibliothek des 18. Jahrhunderts.
  3. Umstätter, W.: Bibliographie, Kataloge, Suchmaschinen : Das Ende der Dokumentation als modernes Bibliothekswesen (2005) 0.02 
    0.015412329 = product of:
  0.061649315 = sum of:
    0.061649315 = weight(_text_:digitale in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061649315 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.34197983 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Als Otlet und La Fontaine um 1900 den Begriff Bibliographie durch den moderneren Begriff Dokumentation ersetzten und im Sinne einer Dokumentationswissenschaft von Dokumentologie sprachen, um damit auch den Weg zu öffnen, immer mehr "Neue Medien", wie Lochkartensysteme, Filme, Mikrofiches, Schallplatten, Magnetbandaufzeichnungen, etc. in die bibliothekarische Wissensbewahrung zu integrieren, da geriet das Bibliothekswesen in eine Zerreißprobe, die für Deutschland besonders nachhaltig war. Eigentlich war es nur ein Zeichen dafür, dass die Bibliothekswissenschaft plötzlich eine so große Dynamik bekam, dass ein Teil ihrer Vertreter sich immer stärker an den rasanten Entwicklungen dieser "Neuen Medien", dann an den informationsverarbeitenden Maschinen und an der Digitalisierung orientierten, während sich andere um so mehr darum bemühten, alte Erfahrungen und das bereits etablierte Wissen nicht dem Untergang preis zu geben. Diese Zerreißprobe hat zunächst auch international eine tiefe Spaltung zwischen Dokumentation und Bibliothekswesen hervorgebracht. Die "alte" Bibliothek erschien zunehmend "verstaubt" gegenüber der modernen Dokumentation, die ihrerseits allerdings einen Namen trug, der sich als Berufsbild in der breiten Bevölkerung nie so recht durchsetzen konnte. Heute hat die Digitale Bibliothek beide wieder vereinigt und damit das Berufsbild Dokumentar auf einen speziellen Bereich, der Erschließung nicht publizierter Dokumente, neben dem Archivar fokussiert.
  4. Schreiber, K.: Neues (und nicht mehr ganz Neues) vin IFB (2002) 0.01 
    0.010274886 = product of:
  0.041099545 = sum of:
    0.041099545 = weight(_text_:digitale in 1212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041099545 = score(doc=1212,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.22798656 = fieldWeight in 1212, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1212)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Den Lesern dieser Zeitschrift ist das Akronym IFB sicherlich noch vertraut, berichtete doch der Herausgeber von Zeit zu Zeit über die Schwerpunkte neuer Hefte des von Jg. 1 (1993) - 8 (2000) unter dem Titel Informationsmittel für Bibliotheken (IFB) bei der Publikationsabteilung des (Ehemaligen) Deutschen Bibliotheksinstituts in gedruckter Form erschienen Rezensionsorgans. Als dieses mit dem Ende des (E)DBI heimatlos wurde, lag es nahe, es als reine Internet-Publikation beim Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden Württemberg (BSZ) fortzuführen. Die Gelegenheit dieses Medienwechsels wurde dazu genutzt, den Titel der Zeitschrift allgemeiner zu fassen, um den Eindruck zu vermeiden, IFB wende sich ausschließlich an eine begrenzte Zielgruppe. Dabei wurde selbstverständlich das auf dem bisherigen Titel beruhende Akronym IFB beibehalten, da es sich als Markenzeichen eingebürgert hat. Ab Jg. 9 (2001) hat die Zeitschrift den folgenden Titel: Informationsmittel (IFB)': digitales Rezensionsorgan für Bibliothek und Wissenschaft - http://www.bsz-bw.de/ifb Der Sprung ins Internet glich allerdings keineswegs dem ins kalte Wasser, da vom Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg alle gedruckten Jahrgänge und ein Teil der Beihefte bereits früher parallel zur Druckausgabe im Internet angeboten worden waren, und das BSZ in IFB eine willkommene Möglichkeit entdeckte, seine primär bibliographischen Dienste durch Volltextangebote anzureichern, indem es Internet-Benutzern des Verbundkatalogs erlaubt, von den dort verzeichneten Titeln ausgehend, eine Rezension in IFB und in anderen Rezensionsdiensten aufzurufen. Diese ursprünglich von Thomas Dierig am Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg konzipierte Dienstleistung hat sich so gut bewährt, dass sie inzwischen als SWB Plus http://www.bsz-bw.de/rekla/ eine eigenständige Dienstleistung des BSZ bildet. Der Herausgeber von IFB ist deshalb mit der Leiterin des BSZ, Frau Dr. Mallmann-Biehler, übereingekommen, IFB als Teil dieses Internet-Angebots weiterzuführen. Dabei sind der Herausgeber und die Rezensenten weiterhin für die Inhalte, das BSZ für das digitale Angebot zuständig. Seit der Umstellung sind im Internet die Jg. 9 (2001),1 - 2 mit zusammen 509 und Jg. 10 (2002),1 mit 195 Rezensionen erschienen. Heft 2 dieses Jahrgangs soll noch vor Jahresende folgen. Die auf den Rezensionen in IFB beruhenden englischsprachigen Abstracts, die von amerikanischen Kollegen zum Nutzen derer, die des Deutschen nicht mächtig sind, sowohl in einem gedruckten Jahresband u.d.T. Reference reviews Europe annual als auch im Internet als Reference reviews Europe Online unter http://rre. casalini. it/ angeboten werden, ist ein vorzügliches Beispiel internationaler Zusammenarbeit (ohne Aufsichtsgremien und ohne Subventionen) zwischen Bibliothekaren und Buchhändlern in Deutschland, den USA und Italien und erfreut sich weiterhin großen Zuspruchs. Der Herausgeber von IFB benutzt die Gelegenheit dieser Mitteilung (die hoffentlich auch jene Bibliothekare, die immer noch unverdrossen beim EDBI die Fortsetzung der gedruckten Zeitschrift reklamieren, auf die Vergeblichkeit dieser Reklamationen aufmerksam machen wird), dem Noch-Redakteur des BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST und früheren Leiter der Publikationsabteilung des DBI (und seinen ehemaligen Mitarbeitern) sehr herzlich für die langjährige gute und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit zu danken.
  5. Hawkins, D.T.: Information Science Abstracts : tracking the literature of information science (2001) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 5198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=5198,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5198, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5198)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The problem of identifying "information science'' is still with us. Hawkins is concerned with the relationship between the information science community and the library community, especially in terms of the recent initiatives to reassert the information technology aspect of information science.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Still the Frontier: Information Science at the Millenium
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.44-53
  6. Hawkins, D.T.; Larson, S.E.; Caton, B.Q.: Information Science Abstracts : tracking the literature of information science (2003) 0.00 
    0.0047031553 = product of:
  0.018812621 = sum of:
    0.018812621 = weight(_text_:information in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018812621 = score(doc=1685,freq=80.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
          8.944272 = tf(freq=80.0), with freq of:
            80.0 = termFreq=80.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Subject classifications and thesauri have become more important than ever in the Web environment. Efforts made to organize information into subject classifications, or taxonomies, offer users the opportunity to substantially improve the effectiveness of their search and retrieval activities. This article continues earlier research an the development of a new definition of the field of information science and the creation of a "map" of the field showing subjects central to it and their relationships to those an the periphery. A case study describes the creation of a new classification structure (taxonomy) for the Information Science Abstracts (ISA) database, aiming to reflect and accommodate the rapid and continued technological and market changes affecting the information industry today and into the future. Based an a sample of some 3,000 ISA abstracts, two validation experiments were conducted by a three-member team comprising a database editor, a reference librarian, and an abstractor-indexer, who represent three of the major communities within the information science field. In the first experiment, the sample of abstracts was classified according to the proposed new taxonomy; alter analysis of the data and revision of the taxonomy, it was revalidated and fine tuned in a second experiment. Indexer consistency measures obtained in this study were significantly higher than those found in previous studies. The taxonomy resulting from this research employs the concepts, definition, and map of information science previously developed. It presents them in an organized hierarchical view of the field and thus makes a significant contribution to information science.
    Content
    Das System: 1. INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 1.1 Basic concepts, definitions, theories, methodologies, and applications 1.2 Properties, needs, quality, and value of information 1.3 Statistics, measurement Bibliometrics, citation analysis, scientometrics, informetrics 1.4 Information retrieval research Searching techniques (Boolean, fuzzy, natural language), the search process, precision/relevance, ranking/recall, searching models, query formulation, inverted files, updating, database structures 1.5 User behavior and uses of information systems Searcher tactics, information overload, user surveys, usability studies 1.6 Human-computer interface Human factors, ergonomics, design issues 1.7 Communication Editing, writing, linguistics, Internet authoring and design principles 1.8 Operations research/mathematics Modeling, Boolean logic, coding, systems analysis, algorithms, compression 1.9 History of information science, biographies
    2. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 2.1 Thesauri, authority lists Taxonomies, ontologies, semantic networks, nomenclatures, terminologies, vocabularies 2.2 Cataloging and classification Tagging, metatags, Dublin Core, DOIs, OPACs, MARC, AACR2, topic maps, cataloging processes and theories 2.3 Abstracting, indexing, reviewing Automatic indexing and abstracting 2.4 Standards and protocols NISO, Z39.5, XML, SGML, HTML, Open Archives Initiative (OAI), Encoded Archival Description (EAD), OpenURL, portable document format (PDF) 3. THE INFORMATION PROFESSION 3.1 Information professionals Intermediaries, searchers, reference librarians, information brokers, translators, educators, librarians and librarianship, mentoring, career outlook, future of the profession, professional ethics, skills and competencies 3.2 Organizations and societies 4. SOCIETAL ISSUES 4.1 Information ethics, plagiarism, credibility 4.2 Information literacy, lifelong learning 4.3 The Information Society Universal access and accessibility, technological and socioeconomic impacts of information, technology forecasts, information flows, futures scenarios, preservation 5. THE INFORMATION INDUSTRY 5.1 Information and knowledge management Knowledge transfer in organizations, business strategies 5.2 Markets and players Vendor profiles and Interviews, trends 5.3 Economics and pricing Business models, value chain 5.4 Marketing, e-commerce 6. PUBLISHING AND DISTRIBUTION 6.1 Print 6.2 Electronic E-journals, e-books 6.3 Secondary publishing Abstracting and indexing services, directories 6.4 Scholarly communication Peer review process, future of journals, dissertations, grey literature
    7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES 7.1 Internet World Wide Web, Invisible Web, Deep Web, search engines, browsers, hypermedia, Listservs, bulletin boards, portals, gateways, directories, pathfinders 7.2 Intranets, Web conferencing 7.3 Software Programming languages, operating systems, platforms 7.4 Hardware 7.5 Multimedia 7.6 Document management Imaging, scanning, text retrieval, digitization, records management, bookmarking, hypertext systems, preservation technologies, digitization, linking and electronic cross referencing, storage, digital rights management 7.7 AI, expert systems, intelligent agents Cybernetics, visualization and mapping, data mining, pattern and character recognition, search agents and robots 7.8 Telecommunications Networks, wireless and satellite information delivery, Palm Pilots and other PDAs, LANs and WANs 7.9 Security, access control, authentication, encryption Digital watermarking 7.10 Other B. ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES 8.1 Information searching and retrieval systems and Services Bibliographie, numeric, and Image databases; descriptions of online Services 8.2 Customized information systems, alerting, current awareness 8.3 Document delivery systems and Services Interlibrary loan, resource sharing 8.4 Geographie information systems 9. SUBJECT-SPECIFIC SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS 9.1 Physical sciences Chemistry, physics, engineering, earth sciences, Computer science, energy, mathematics 9.2 Life sciences Medicine, biosciences, agriculture, environment 9.3 Social sciences, humanities, history, linguistics 9.4 Business Management, economics, companies 9.5 Law, political science, government Patents and trademarks, intellectual property, case law 9.6 News 9.7 Education, library and information science, ready reference 9.8 Other/multidisciplinary Biography and genealogy databases, encyclopedias, databases of theses and dissertations
    10. LIBRARIES AND LIBRARY SERVICES 10.1 Library descriptions and types Special, government, academic, and public libraries, archives, museums, state and national libraries, depository libraries 10.2 Library Services 10.3 Library automation, operations, and strategic planning 10.4 Library consortia and networks, coalitions, cooperatives 10.5 Digital and virtual libraries, hybrid libraries 10.6 Education and training Distance learning, continuing education, bibliographic instruction library schools, courses and Curricula 11. GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL INFORMATION AND ISSUES 11.1 Intellectual property protection Copyright issues and implications, fair use, trademarks, patent law 11.2 Legislation, laws, and regulations (except Copyright) 11.3 Contracts and licensing 11.4 Liability issues Filtering, censorship, privacy 11.5 Sources of public information 11.6 Information policies and studies Security, encryption, privacy, freedom of information, censoring, national and other information policies 11.7 Systems and infrastructure Technology transfer
    Issue
    Pt.2: A new taxonomy for information science.
    Object
    Information Science Abstracts
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.771-781
  7. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.00 
    0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381
  8. Roberts, J.R.; Drost, C.A.: Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (2006) 0.00 
    0.004164351 = product of:
  0.016657405 = sum of:
    0.016657405 = weight(_text_:information in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016657405 = score(doc=4862,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The article focuses on the EBSCO databases that provide services to libraries. The Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) include resources focusing on librarianship, classification, cataloging, bibliometrics, online information retrieval, and information science. LISTA has more than 21,000 articles from more than 600 periodicals and includes more than 5,000 conference papers and reports. In the database, there are also cited references and the number of times the source was used can also be found within the database. These are helpful tips in bibliography researching. The database has also several search options including "Basic Search," "Advanced Search," and Indexes." The EBSCOhost interface is simple to use and easy to grasp while LISTA is a free abstract database.
  9. Hendry, D.G.; Jenkins, J.R.; McCarthy, J.F.: Collaborative bibliography (2006) 0.00 
    0.0036430482 = product of:
  0.014572193 = sum of:
    0.014572193 = weight(_text_:information in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014572193 = score(doc=980,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A bibliography is traditionally characterized by the judgments, bounded by explicit selection criteria, made by a single compiler. Because these criteria concern the attributes ascribed to a work and the needs of readers, bibliographic work is largely conceptual even across technological eras and domains. Yet, the development of networked information services, made possible by WWW infrastructure, has enabled very large numbers of people to discover, organize, and publish information, including bibliographies. Indeed, bibliographies, or at least bibliography-like artifacts, are a common genre of website, often published by people without specialized skills in information organization who follow non-rigorous selection procedures. Nevertheless, even if the items from these lists are poorly selected and described, this publishing activity is fundamentally important because it structures information locally, creating a patchy network of secondary access points. In turn, these access points enable information discovery, the formation and development of communities of interest, the estimation of document relevance by search engines, and so on. In sum, this activity, and the enabling technical infrastructure, invites bibliographies to take on new interactive possibilities. The aim of this article is to extend the traditional view of bibliography to encompass collaborative possibilities for wide, or narrow, participation in the shaping of bibliographies and the selection of items. This is done by examining the nature of bibliography on the Web, by proposing a conceptual model that opens bibliography to participatory practices, and by discussing a case study where a team sought to develop a bibliography of electronic resources. This examination reveals splendid opportunities for expanding the notion of bibliography with participatory policies while remaining true to its ancient roots.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.805-825
  10. Burchinal, L.G.: ¬The tale of two ERICs : factors influencing the development of the first ERIC and its transformation into a national system (2000) 0.00 
    0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=4606,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article describes how the original ERIC was established as a conventional, centralized information center within the Office of Education in 1964, and how this initial ERIC was transformed from into a decentralized national system about 18 months later. The history of the two ERICs also illustrates how knowledge and expertise - in this case, that represented by advances in information systems technology and its applications - combined with interpersonal relationships within a bureaucracy, federal funding decisions, and organizational changes to shape the development of a major national information service. The time period covered by the article is from 1959, when planning for the first ERIC began, to June 1967, when the decentralized system became fully operational. Most of the description and analysis, however, is limited to the 1965-66 period, when the decentralized system was conceptualized and implemented. Important developments in ERIC since 1967 are also described
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.6, S.567-575
  11. Wiggins, B.: IFLA survey on inclusion of electronic resources in national bibliographies (2005) 0.00 
    0.003091229 = product of:
  0.012364916 = sum of:
    0.012364916 = weight(_text_:information in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012364916 = score(doc=4362,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    To assist the IFLA Bibliography Section in gathering more comprehensive information on selection criteria used by national bibliographic agencies in preparing their countries' national bibliography, the Section crafted a survey that the Section chair and the Oslo Programme chair sent electronically and in print form. With the exponential availability of Web and other digital resources, the Section felt a critical need to address how national bibliographic agencies were incorporating these resources into the national bibliography. In preparation for the Section's Programme during the 71st IFLA World Library and Information Congress, the survey was sent to forty-four national libraries and bibliographic agencies in Europe. We restricted dissemination of the survey to European countries, in line with the Section's strategy to plan its programmes in ways that focused on what was happening in the area of the world where the IFLA Congress was being convened. This paper gives an analysis of the data submitted in the responses.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  12. Nilges, C.: ¬The Online Computer Library Center's Open WorldCat program (2006) 0.00 
    0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=5591,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article describes the Online Computer Library Center's (OCLC) Open WorldCat program. WorldCat is a worldwide union catalog created and maintained collectively by more than 9,000 member institutions. Open WorldCat seeks to make library collections and services visible and available through popular search engines such as Yahoo! and Google and other heavily used sites on the open Web. In this capacity, Open WorldCat provides an important central connection between the shared information of the library network and the Web. The article describes the history and rationale of the project; explains how Open WorldCat works for information seekers, participating libraries, and partners; and reports on what OCLC has learned from the program to date.
  13. Gömpel, R.: IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS) update (2005) 0.00 
    0.0025239778 = product of:
  0.010095911 = sum of:
    0.010095911 = weight(_text_:information in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010095911 = score(doc=4347,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Almost two years ago the IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards has been established at the IFLA conference in Berlin. The following paper gives a short overview about the ICABS-related activities of the alliance partners. Objectives and goals of ICABS The objectives of ICABS are: - to coordinate activities aimed at the development of standards and practices for bibliographic and resource control - to support the international exchange of bibliographic resources by supporting, promoting, developing, and testing the maintenance of metadata and format standards - to ensure the promotion of new conventions - to act as a clearinghouse for information on all IFLA endeavours in these fields - to organize and participate in seminars and workshops - to enhance communication within the community.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  14. Krummel, D.W.: Bibliography (2009) 0.00 
    0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=3752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  15. Connell, T.H.; Prabha, C.: Characteristics of resources represented in the OCLC CORC database (2002) 0.00 
    0.0021033147 = product of:
  0.008413259 = sum of:
    0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008413259 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    More and more libraries are providing access to Web resources through OCLC's (Online Computer Resource Center) Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) and, by extension, OCLC's WorldCat database. The ability to use a database to its maximum potential depends upon understanding what a database contains and the guidelines for its construction. This study examines the characteristics of Web resources in CORC in terms of their subject matter, the source of the content, publication patterns, and the units of information chosen for representation in the database. The majority of the 414 resources in the sample belonged to the social sciences. Academic libraries and government agencies contributed more than 90% of the records for resources in the sample. Using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2d edition (AACR2) definitions for publication patterns that are part of the upcoming 2002 amendments reveals that nearly half of the sample fell into the category of integrating resources. Identifying units of representation of the resources described was more difficult. Existing definitions for Web units in development are not adequate to describe all of the resources in the sample. In addition, there is wide variability in the units of representation chosen for inclusion by the libraries contributing records, resulting in little predictability in what units of information might be found in the database.
  16. Egghe, L.: Sampling and concentration values of incomplete bibliographies (2002) 0.00 
    0.0020821756 = product of:
  0.008328702 = sum of:
    0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008328702 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.4, S.271-281
  17. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.00 
    0.0020821756 = product of:
  0.008328702 = sum of:
    0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008328702 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  18. Kliemt, A.: WorldCat - ein globales bibliographisches Universalsystem aus deutscher Sicht (2006) 0.00 
    0.0020821756 = product of:
  0.008328702 = sum of:
    0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 5132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008328702 = score(doc=5132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5132)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.3, S.149-156
  19. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.00 
    0.0017847219 = product of:
  0.0071388874 = sum of:
    0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071388874 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
  20. Niggemann, E.; Rinn, R.: Vom CIP- zum Neuerscheinungsdienst : Hintergründe der Neukonzeption, aktueller Stand, Ausblick (2003) 0.00 
    0.0017847219 = product of:
  0.0071388874 = sum of:
    0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071388874 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ramamrita Ranganathan hat 1948 erstmals das Konzept einer "Pre-natal classification and cataloguing" in den USA vorgestellt; rund 10 Jahre später führte die Library of Congress ein "cataloguing-in-source"-Projekt durch, das aber noch nicht bis zur konkreten Realisierung eines entsprechenden LC-Dienstes gedieh. 1971 schlug mit der Gründung des "CIP Office" in der LC die Geburtsstunde des ersten CIP-Dienstes der WeIt ("cataloguing-inpublication"). Andere nationale CIP-Programme folgten bald, darunter bereits 1974 der CIP-Dienst Der Deutschen Bibliothek sowie ein Vorläufer des kanadischen CIP-Dienstes, der offiziell zwei Jahre später aufgenommen wurde, und 1975 der CIP-Dienst der British Library. Die aus bibliothekarischer Sicht wichtigsten Funktionen des CIP-Dienstes waren - die Erwerbungsgrundlage durch möglichst frühzeitige Information über Neuerscheinungen und Neuausgaben sowie - die Katalogisierungsgrundlage (auch mittels des Eindrucks der CIP-Titelaufnahme im Buch). Die Basis des Verfahrens waren bis zuletzt die Titelmeldungen der Verleger auf einem gemeinsamen VLB-CIP-Formular (in den letzten Jahren auch in elektronischer Form) sowie die sog. Titeleien (Kopien der Titelseiten und dgl.), die im Prinzip mindestens vier Wochen vor dem Erscheinungstermin in der CIP-Stelle eingegangen sein mussten.

Authors

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 11

Themes