Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0077061644 = product of:
  0.030824658 = sum of:
    0.030824658 = weight(_text_:digitale in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030824658 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18027179 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.17098992 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

"Robert T-Online hat endlich wieder einen spannenden Job. Die Aufgabe, Anleger für den Börsengang der Telekom-Internettochter zu begeistern, hat das virtuelle Reklamemännchen abgehakt. Jetzt wirbt der strohblonde Robert bundesweit auf Plakaten und in Zeitungsanzeigen für ,Sssssuper-Highspeed zum Sssssuperpreis". Gemeint ist der brandneue Internettarif T-Online DSL Flat 49 Mark Pauschale im Monat für unbegrenztes Surfen im World Wide Web ohne zusätzliche Telefongebühren. Und das bei Übertragungsraten von 768 Kilobit pro Sekunde für das Herunterladen und 128 Kilobit pro Sekunde für das Versenden von Daten. Also satte zwölfmal so schnell wie bei einem herkömmlichen ISDN-Anschluss. Für Telekom-Marketingvorstand Detlev Buchal ein schlicht unschlagbares Angebot". Das Kürzel DSL steht für "Digital Subscriber Line", zu deutsch "Digitale Teilnehmer-Leitung". DSL-Technologie ermöglicht die Ubertragung breitbandiger Datendienste auf herkömmlichen Telefon-Kupferkabeln. DSL-Zugänge ins Internet bieten nicht nur einen deutlich rascheren Seitenaufbau, sie leisten vor allem erstmals die Übermittlung von Bild- und Tondateien in befriedigender Qualität auf den PC. Mit DSL kann das strapazierte Schlagwort vom Internet-Fernsehen erstmals Realität werden. Zwar hält der Pink Panther schon seit Sommer 1999 unter dem Produktnamen T-DSV für Geschäfts- und Privatkunden auch einen Online-Hochgeschwindigkeitszug unter Dampf. Doch das Angebot stand nur in einigen Ballungsräumen zur Verfügung, schreckte den gemeinen Web-Nutzer durch allzu hohe Entgelte ab und lockte deshalb bisher nur rund 100 000 Interessenten hinter dem PC hervor. Mit der seit Monatsbeginn gültigen drastischen Preissenkung hat sich der Bonner Multimedia-Riese nicht weniger vorgenommen, als in den nächsten Jahren die breite Masse der bereits über 18 Millionen deutschen Internet-Nutzer in Highspeed-Surfer zu verwandeln.

0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=3813,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information retrieval (IR) protocols support effective and interoperable intersystem search and retrieval. Although intersystem search methods have been envisioned and under development since the 1970s, it was the Z39.50 IR protocol, first released in 1988, that demonstrated real-world possibilities for such search and retrieval. As the networked information environment changed with the emergence of the World Wide Web, the need for standard IR protocols did not disappear, and one can argue the need is even more compelling given both the visible and invisible Web. A new protocol, based on the experience from Z39.50 but simpler and more comprehensible than Z39.50, is now being used for Web search and retrieval. Search and retrieve via URL (SRU) uses Web technologies and standards resulting in a Web friendly protocol that provides standard search access to existing Z39.50 resources and a wide-range of new non-catalog digital resources. This entry provides both an overview of the two protocols and technical details to understand both. A brief discussion of IR and communications protocols provides background to the specifics of these two IR protocols. Although communication protocols are by their nature technical specifications, this entry focuses on an overview of the functions and capabilities of the protocols. It uses technical concepts and terminology from the protocols to help explain how the protocols work but limits discussion of technical details.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis

0.0021033147 = product of:
  0.008413259 = sum of:
    0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 5155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008413259 = score(doc=5155,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5155, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5155)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.2, S.161-168

0.0014872681 = product of:
  0.0059490725 = sum of:
    0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059490725 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.5/6, S.274

0.0014872681 = product of:
  0.0059490725 = sum of:
    0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059490725 = score(doc=4898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article will examine the Z39.50 Information Retrieval protocol. It will look at some of the history of the protocol, its operation, and some of the major projects that have made use of it. There has been enough written (perhaps too much) about Z39.50 in the last several years so it is not intended to be a tutorial or detailed description of the protocol. The material that will be presented will try and put some context around the discussion. For those readers who are interested in delving into Z39.50 in a more technical manner, references to much of the material that has been written about it over the years will be provided at the end. Finally, the article will conclude with some thoughts on how technology and technological infrastructure have changed in the years since Z39.50 was initially developed and deployed, and where the protocol has so far lived up to its goals, and where it has perhaps failed to meet some of the high expectations that at least some people involved in the Z39.50 community held for it. The article will conclude with some of the author's speculations (and they are really no more than that) of what the future role of Z39.50 is likely to be.