-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.26
0.26499715 = sum of:
0.26085937 = product of:
0.52171874 = sum of:
0.20357975 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20357975 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4346759 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.31813902 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31813902 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5433839 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.0041377926 = product of:
0.008275585 = sum of:
0.008275585 = weight(_text_:e in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008275585 = score(doc=692,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
- Language
- e
-
McFadden, T.: Editors on indexes (1993)
0.14
0.1393521 = sum of:
0.12764865 = product of:
0.5105946 = sum of:
0.5105946 = weight(_text_:editors in 7633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5105946 = score(doc=7633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
1.4834394 = fieldWeight in 7633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7633)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.011703446 = product of:
0.023406891 = sum of:
0.023406891 = weight(_text_:e in 7633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023406891 = score(doc=7633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.31761688 = fieldWeight in 7633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Frame, A.: Indexers and publishers : their views on indexers and indexing (1996)
0.12
0.12230051 = sum of:
0.11820431 = product of:
0.47281724 = sum of:
0.47281724 = weight(_text_:editors in 3736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.47281724 = score(doc=3736,freq=14.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
1.3736842 = fieldWeight in 3736, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3736)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.004096206 = product of:
0.008192412 = sum of:
0.008192412 = weight(_text_:e in 3736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008192412 = score(doc=3736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3736)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a summary of the results of a 1995 questionnaire survey of UK indexers and editors, focusing on work practices, relations between editors and indexers, editors' and editors' expectations, and the value placed on various characteristics of indexers and indexing. Data from 146 indexers and 123 editors was analysed on the following topics: subject area covered, number of years working as indexers, hours spent on indexing, ages of indexers, reasons why indexers index, payment for indexing, how editors find and choose indexers and how indexers find work, the relationship between editors and the Society of Indexers, indexers' qualifications and training, qualitites that make a good indexer, editor's opinions of indexers and indexing, important elements in producing a good index, and indexers and computers. discusses areas worthy of further investigation as highlighted by the survey results
- Language
- e
-
Frame, A.: Indexers and publishers : their views on indexers and indexing (1996)
0.12
0.118394814 = sum of:
0.11488378 = product of:
0.45953512 = sum of:
0.45953512 = weight(_text_:editors in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.45953512 = score(doc=3737,freq=18.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
1.3350954 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0035110335 = product of:
0.007022067 = sum of:
0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007022067 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Second of 2 articles reporting the results of a 1995 questionnaire survey of UK indexers and editors, focusing on work practices, relations between editors and indexers, editors' and editors' expectations, and the value placed on various characteristics of indexers and indexing. Data from 146 indexers and 123 editors was analysed on the following topics: complexity of the index and satisfaction with the index produced; instruction given to indexers; problems with the index; editors' judgement of the acceptability of the index; why the index was remembered; and whether editors would use the indexers again. While a high level of satisfaction with the indexes produced on the part of both editors and indexers was reported, results would seem to indicate that sending written instructions to indexers before the proofs are sent gives the lowest percentage of problems with the finished index. Suggests taht editors should consistently tell indexers of any problems to enable indexers to correct what goes wrong
- Language
- e
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.11
0.10977505 = sum of:
0.061073925 = product of:
0.2442957 = sum of:
0.2442957 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2442957 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4346759 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.048701126 = sum of:
0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007022067 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04167906 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
- Language
- e
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.11
0.1076416 = sum of:
0.10178988 = product of:
0.4071595 = sum of:
0.4071595 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4071595 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4346759 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.005851723 = product of:
0.011703446 = sum of:
0.011703446 = weight(_text_:e in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011703446 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Álvarez, E. Corera- -> Corera-Álvarez, E.:
0.10
0.103219524 = product of:
0.20643905 = sum of:
0.20643905 = sum of:
0.03972281 = weight(_text_:e in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03972281 = score(doc=942,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.53901374 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
0.16671623 = weight(_text_:22 in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16671623 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 2.2008 12:22:10
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995)
0.10
0.10149501 = sum of:
0.044677034 = product of:
0.17870814 = sum of:
0.17870814 = weight(_text_:editors in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17870814 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.51920384 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05681798 = sum of:
0.008192412 = weight(_text_:e in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008192412 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.048625566 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048625566 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
- Abstract
- Survey on the activities going to develop the UDC into a fully faceted classification system according to the Recommendations of the UDC Management Board. A Master Reference File (MRF) has been created from which any publisher or insitution may develop its own versions according to the requests of its clientele. The UDC Technical Director at the FID Headquarters in The Hague maintains the file. An Editorial Board and an Editor in Chief was appointed. Extensions and Corrections are being published. Examples are given on ongoing revision work in the classes for Astronomy, Linguistics and Philology as well as in Medicine. Cooperation with the Editors of the Bliss Classification and the DDC exists
- Language
- e
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.10
0.09690103 = sum of:
0.079534754 = product of:
0.31813902 = sum of:
0.31813902 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31813902 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5433839 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017366275 = product of:
0.03473255 = sum of:
0.03473255 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03473255 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for editors and publishers (1987)
0.10
0.09611295 = sum of:
0.09026123 = product of:
0.3610449 = sum of:
0.3610449 = weight(_text_:editors in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3610449 = score(doc=5941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
1.0489501 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.005851723 = product of:
0.011703446 = sum of:
0.011703446 = weight(_text_:e in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011703446 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Guidelines for editors and publishers of scholarly texts to which markup has been added in accordance with the SGML
- Language
- e
-
Garcia-Barriocanal, E.; Sicilia, M.A.; Sanchez-Alonso, S.: Usability evaluation of ontology editors (2005)
0.09
0.09059467 = sum of:
0.08562932 = product of:
0.3425173 = sum of:
0.3425173 = weight(_text_:editors in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3425173 = score(doc=3084,freq=10.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.9951215 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0049653514 = product of:
0.009930703 = sum of:
0.009930703 = weight(_text_:e in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009930703 = score(doc=3084,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ontology editors are software tools that allow the creation and maintenance of ontologies through a graphical user interface. As the semantic web effort grows, a larger community of users for this kind of tool is expected. New users include people not specifically skilled in the use of ontology formalisms. In consequence, the usability of ontology editors can be viewed as a key adoption precondition for semantic web technologies. In this paper, the usability evaluation of several representative ontology editors is described. This evaluation is carried out by combining a heuristic pre-assessment with a subsequent usertesting phase. The target population is comprised of people with no specific ontology-creation skills that have a general knowledge about domain modelling. For this kind of user, current editors are adequate for the creation and maintenance of simple ontologies. Also, there is room for improvement, especially in browsing mechanisms, help systems, and visualization metaphors.
- Language
- e
-
Knowledge management in practice : connections and context. (2008)
0.09
0.0889127 = sum of:
0.036104493 = product of:
0.14441797 = sum of:
0.14441797 = weight(_text_:editors in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14441797 = score(doc=2749,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.41958004 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05280821 = sum of:
0.004681378 = weight(_text_:e in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004681378 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.04812683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04812683 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
- Classification
- 658.4/038 22
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:43:51
- DDC
- 658.4/038 22
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 60(2006) no.3, S.642 (A.E. Prentice): "What is knowledge management (KM)? How do we define it? How do we use it and what are the benefits? KM is still an operational discipline that has yet to have an academic foundation. Its core has yet to solidify and concepts and practices remain fluid, making it difficult to discuss or even to identify the range of relevant elements. Being aware of this lack of a well-structured retrievable disciplinary literature, the editors made a practice of attending trade shows and conferences attended by KM professionals to look for presentations that would in some way expand knowledge of the field. They asked presenters to turn their paper into a book chapter, which is the major source of the material in this book. Although this is a somewhat chancy method of identifying authors and topics, several of the papers are excellent and a number add to an understanding of KM. Because of the fluidity of the area of study, the editors devised a three-dimensional topic expansion approach to the content so that the reader can follow themes in the papers that would not have been easy to do if one relied solely on the table of contents. The table of contents organizes the presentations into eight subject sections, each section with a foreword that introduces the topic and indicates briefly the contribution of each chapter to the overall section title. Following this, the Roadmap lists 18 topics or themes that appear in the book and relevant chapters where information on the theme can be found. Readers have the choice of following themes using the roadmap or of reading the book section by section. ..."
- Language
- e
-
Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998)
0.09
0.087953545 = product of:
0.17590709 = sum of:
0.17590709 = sum of:
0.018725513 = weight(_text_:e in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018725513 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.15718158 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15718158 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.11.2004 13:03:22
- Language
- e
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
-
Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003)
0.09
0.087953545 = product of:
0.17590709 = sum of:
0.17590709 = sum of:
0.018725513 = weight(_text_:e in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018725513 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
0.15718158 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15718158 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2005 14:22:22
- Language
- e
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.09
0.08699572 = sum of:
0.0382946 = product of:
0.1531784 = sum of:
0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1531784 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.048701126 = sum of:
0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007022067 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04167906 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Language
- e
-
Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995)
0.09
0.08699572 = sum of:
0.0382946 = product of:
0.1531784 = sum of:
0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1531784 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.048701126 = sum of:
0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007022067 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04167906 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
- Abstract
- This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
- Date
- 22. 1.1996 18:26:45
- Language
- e
-
Pepermans, G.; Rousseau, S.: ¬The decision to submit to a journal : another example of a valence-consistent shift? (2016)
0.09
0.08699572 = sum of:
0.0382946 = product of:
0.1531784 = sum of:
0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1531784 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.048701126 = sum of:
0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007022067 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04167906 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
- Abstract
- In this article we use a stated choice experiment to study researcher preferences in the information sciences and to investigate the relative importance of different journal characteristics in convincing potential authors to submit to a particular journal. The analysis distinguishes high quality from standard quality articles and focuses on the question whether communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates leads to other submission decisions. Our results show that a positive framing effect might be present when authors decide on submitting a high quality article. No evidence of a framing effect is found when authors consider a standard quality article. From a journal marketing perspective, this is important information for editors. Communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates might help to convince researchers to submit to their journal.
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 20:02:22
- Language
- e
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.09
0.08611328 = sum of:
0.0814319 = product of:
0.3257276 = sum of:
0.3257276 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3257276 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4346759 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.004681378 = product of:
0.009362756 = sum of:
0.009362756 = weight(_text_:e in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009362756 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Hunnisett, R.F.: Indexing for editors (1997)
0.08
0.083611265 = sum of:
0.0765892 = product of:
0.3063568 = sum of:
0.3063568 = weight(_text_:editors in 6449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3063568 = score(doc=6449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.8900637 = fieldWeight in 6449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6449)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.007022067 = product of:
0.014044134 = sum of:
0.014044134 = weight(_text_:e in 6449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014044134 = score(doc=6449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 6449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981)
0.08
0.08116855 = product of:
0.1623371 = sum of:
0.1623371 = sum of:
0.023406891 = weight(_text_:e in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023406891 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.31761688 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.1389302 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1389302 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051270977 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
