Search (260 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.04
    0.03714731 = product of:
      0.111441925 = sum of:
        0.111441925 = product of:
          0.16716288 = sum of:
            0.08395907 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08395907 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.08320381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08320381 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  2. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.03
    0.026188917 = product of:
      0.07856675 = sum of:
        0.07856675 = product of:
          0.117850125 = sum of:
            0.06987351 = weight(_text_:k in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06987351 = score(doc=5066,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
            0.047976613 = weight(_text_:29 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047976613 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
    Source
    Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.02
    0.022915302 = product of:
      0.0687459 = sum of:
        0.0687459 = product of:
          0.10311885 = sum of:
            0.06113932 = weight(_text_:k in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06113932 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
            0.041979536 = weight(_text_:29 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041979536 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Classification
    BCGS (FH K)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 19:02:46
    GHBS
    BCGS (FH K)
  4. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.02
    0.021227032 = product of:
      0.063681096 = sum of:
        0.063681096 = product of:
          0.095521644 = sum of:
            0.047976613 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047976613 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
            0.04754503 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04754503 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  5. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.02
    0.018935904 = product of:
      0.05680771 = sum of:
        0.05680771 = product of:
          0.08521157 = sum of:
            0.04323203 = weight(_text_:k in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04323203 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
            0.041979536 = weight(_text_:29 in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041979536 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:42:14
  6. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.02
    0.018573655 = product of:
      0.055720963 = sum of:
        0.055720963 = product of:
          0.08358144 = sum of:
            0.041979536 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041979536 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
            0.041601904 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041601904 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  7. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.02
    0.018573655 = product of:
      0.055720963 = sum of:
        0.055720963 = product of:
          0.08358144 = sum of:
            0.041979536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041979536 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
            0.041601904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041601904 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  8. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.02
    0.016308133 = product of:
      0.048924398 = sum of:
        0.048924398 = product of:
          0.073386595 = sum of:
            0.043670945 = weight(_text_:k in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043670945 = score(doc=4191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
  9. Zhao, M.; Yan, E.; Li, K.: Data set mentions and citations : a content analysis of full-text publications (2018) 0.02
    0.016230777 = product of:
      0.048692327 = sum of:
        0.048692327 = product of:
          0.07303849 = sum of:
            0.037056025 = weight(_text_:k in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037056025 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
            0.03598246 = weight(_text_:29 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03598246 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18.12.2017 16:29:01
  10. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.02
    0.016158845 = product of:
      0.048476532 = sum of:
        0.048476532 = product of:
          0.0727148 = sum of:
            0.037056025 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037056025 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
            0.035658773 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035658773 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  11. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.02
    0.015920276 = product of:
      0.047760826 = sum of:
        0.047760826 = product of:
          0.07164124 = sum of:
            0.03598246 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03598246 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
            0.035658773 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035658773 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    17.12.2006 19:44:29
  12. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.02
    0.015920276 = product of:
      0.047760826 = sum of:
        0.047760826 = product of:
          0.07164124 = sum of:
            0.03598246 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03598246 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
            0.035658773 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035658773 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  13. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017) 0.01
    0.013525645 = product of:
      0.040576935 = sum of:
        0.040576935 = product of:
          0.060865402 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
            0.029985385 = weight(_text_:29 in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029985385 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:45
  14. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.01
    0.013465704 = product of:
      0.04039711 = sum of:
        0.04039711 = product of:
          0.060595665 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  15. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.01
    0.013465704 = product of:
      0.04039711 = sum of:
        0.04039711 = product of:
          0.060595665 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  16. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.01
    0.013465704 = product of:
      0.04039711 = sum of:
        0.04039711 = product of:
          0.060595665 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  17. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.01
    0.013465704 = product of:
      0.04039711 = sum of:
        0.04039711 = product of:
          0.060595665 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22
  18. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.01
    0.013465704 = product of:
      0.04039711 = sum of:
        0.04039711 = product of:
          0.060595665 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
  19. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.01
    0.013465704 = product of:
      0.04039711 = sum of:
        0.04039711 = product of:
          0.060595665 = sum of:
            0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03088002 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  20. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.013266897 = product of:
      0.03980069 = sum of:
        0.03980069 = product of:
          0.059701033 = sum of:
            0.029985385 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029985385 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Years

Types

  • a 257
  • m 3
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…