-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.02
0.020148903 = product of:
0.040297806 = sum of:
0.040297806 = product of:
0.06044671 = sum of:
0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030359907 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0300868 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? (2015)
0.01
0.006071981 = product of:
0.012143962 = sum of:
0.012143962 = product of:
0.036431886 = sum of:
0.036431886 = weight(_text_:29 in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036431886 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:29:49
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
0.01
0.006071981 = product of:
0.012143962 = sum of:
0.012143962 = product of:
0.036431886 = sum of:
0.036431886 = weight(_text_:29 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036431886 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.12.2015 11:29:37
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.01
0.00601736 = product of:
0.01203472 = sum of:
0.01203472 = product of:
0.036104158 = sum of:
0.036104158 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036104158 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.00601736 = product of:
0.01203472 = sum of:
0.01203472 = product of:
0.036104158 = sum of:
0.036104158 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036104158 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.00601736 = product of:
0.01203472 = sum of:
0.01203472 = product of:
0.036104158 = sum of:
0.036104158 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036104158 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.00601736 = product of:
0.01203472 = sum of:
0.01203472 = product of:
0.036104158 = sum of:
0.036104158 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036104158 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.: Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary (2011)
0.01
0.0050599845 = product of:
0.010119969 = sum of:
0.010119969 = product of:
0.030359907 = sum of:
0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030359907 = score(doc=4465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 7.2011 19:39:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Vis, F.: Commenting on YouTube videos : From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang (2012)
0.01
0.0050599845 = product of:
0.010119969 = sum of:
0.010119969 = product of:
0.030359907 = sum of:
0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030359907 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- YouTube is one of the world's most popular websites and hosts numerous amateur and professional videos. Comments on these videos might be researched to give insights into audience reactions to important issues or particular videos. Yet, little is known about YouTube discussions in general: how frequent they are, who typically participates, and the role of sentiment. This article fills this gap through an analysis of large samples of text comments on YouTube videos. The results identify patterns and give some benchmarks against which future YouTube research into individual videos can be compared. For instance, the typical YouTube comment was mildly positive, was posted by a 29-year-old male, and contained 58 characters. About 23% of comments in the complete comment sets were replies to previous comments. There was no typical density of discussion on YouTube videos in the sense of the proportion of replies to other comments: videos with both few and many replies were common. The YouTube audience engaged with each other disproportionately when making negative comments, however; positive comments elicited few replies. The biggest trigger of discussion seemed to be religion, whereas the videos attracting the least discussion were predominantly from the Music, Comedy, and How to & Style categories. This suggests different audience uses for YouTube, from passive entertainment to active debating.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks (2014)
0.01
0.0050599845 = product of:
0.010119969 = sum of:
0.010119969 = product of:
0.030359907 = sum of:
0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030359907 = score(doc=1331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Some curricula vitae (web CVs) of academics on the web, including homepages and publication lists, link to open-access (OA) articles, resources, abstracts in publishers' websites, or academic discussions, helping to disseminate research. To assess how common such practices are and whether they vary by discipline, gender, and country, the authors conducted a large-scale e-mail survey of astronomy and astrophysics, public health, environmental engineering, and philosophy across 15 European countries and analyzed hyperlinks from web CVs of academics. About 60% of the 2,154 survey responses reported having a web CV or something similar, and there were differences between disciplines, genders, and countries. A follow-up outlink analysis of 2,700 web CVs found that a third had at least one outlink to an OA target, typically a public eprint archive or an individual self-archived file. This proportion was considerably higher in astronomy (48%) and philosophy (37%) than in environmental engineering (29%) and public health (21%). There were also differences in linking to publishers' websites, resources, and discussions. Perhaps most important, however, the amount of linking to OA publications seems to be much lower than allowed by publishers and journals, suggesting that many opportunities for disseminating full-text research online are being missed, especially in disciplines without established repositories. Moreover, few academics seem to be exploiting their CVs to link to discussions, resources, or article abstracts, which seems to be another missed opportunity for publicizing research.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017)
0.01
0.0050599845 = product of:
0.010119969 = sum of:
0.010119969 = product of:
0.030359907 = sum of:
0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030359907 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:29:45
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.01
0.005014467 = product of:
0.010028934 = sum of:
0.010028934 = product of:
0.0300868 = sum of:
0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0300868 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.005014467 = product of:
0.010028934 = sum of:
0.010028934 = product of:
0.0300868 = sum of:
0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0300868 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.01
0.005014467 = product of:
0.010028934 = sum of:
0.010028934 = product of:
0.0300868 = sum of:
0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0300868 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
