Search (23 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01
    0.005014467 = product of:
      0.010028934 = sum of:
        0.010028934 = product of:
          0.0300868 = sum of:
            0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0300868 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044413086 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017) 0.01
    0.005014467 = product of:
      0.010028934 = sum of:
        0.010028934 = product of:
          0.0300868 = sum of:
            0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0300868 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044413086 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.01
    0.005014467 = product of:
      0.010028934 = sum of:
        0.010028934 = product of:
          0.0300868 = sum of:
            0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0300868 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044413086 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50