Search (69 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.06
    0.059786327 = product of:
      0.08967949 = sum of:
        0.07140578 = product of:
          0.21421733 = sum of:
            0.21421733 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21421733 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3811574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04495835 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.018273706 = product of:
          0.03654741 = sum of:
            0.03654741 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03654741 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04495835 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.05
    0.05103851 = product of:
      0.07655776 = sum of:
        0.055238437 = weight(_text_:f in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055238437 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.021319324 = product of:
          0.04263865 = sum of:
            0.04263865 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04263865 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04495835 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
  3. Vichot, F.; Wolinksi, F.; Tomeh, J.; Guennou, S.; Dillet, B.; Aydjian, S.: High precision hypertext navigation based on NLP automation extractions (1997) 0.04
    0.0446394 = product of:
      0.1339182 = sum of:
        0.1339182 = weight(_text_:f in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1339182 = score(doc=733,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.74733484 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Gonzalo, J.; Verdejo, F.; Peters, C.; Calzolari, N.: Applying EuroWordNet to cross-language text retrieval (1998) 0.04
    0.036825627 = product of:
      0.110476874 = sum of:
        0.110476874 = weight(_text_:f in 6445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110476874 = score(doc=6445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 6445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  5. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.04
    0.03645608 = product of:
      0.054684117 = sum of:
        0.03945603 = weight(_text_:f in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03945603 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.015228089 = product of:
          0.030456178 = sum of:
            0.030456178 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030456178 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04495835 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  6. Hull, D.; Ait-Mokhtar, S.; Chuat, M.; Eisele, A.; Gaussier, E.; Grefenstette, G.; Isabelle, P.; Samulesson, C.; Segand, F.: Language technologies and patent search and classification (2001) 0.03
    0.03156482 = product of:
      0.09469446 = sum of:
        0.09469446 = weight(_text_:f in 6318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09469446 = score(doc=6318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 6318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6318)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Rodriguez, H.; Climent, S.; Vossen, P.; Bloksma, L.; Peters, W.; Alonge, A.; Bertagna, F.; Roventini, A.: ¬The top-down strategy for building EuroWordNet : vocabulary coverage, base concept and top ontology (1998) 0.03
    0.03156482 = product of:
      0.09469446 = sum of:
        0.09469446 = weight(_text_:f in 6441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09469446 = score(doc=6441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 6441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6441)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Rosemblat, G.; Tse, T.; Gemoets, D.: Adapting a monolingual consumer health system for Spanish cross-language information retrieval (2004) 0.03
    0.02630402 = product of:
      0.07891206 = sum of:
        0.07891206 = weight(_text_:f in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07891206 = score(doc=2673,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This preliminary study applies a bilingual term list (BTL) approach to cross-language information retrieval (CLIR) in the consumer health domain and compares it to a machine translation (MT) approach. We compiled a Spanish-English BTL of 34,980 medical and general terms. We collected a training set of 466 general health queries from MedlinePlus en espaiiol and 488 domainspecific queries from ClinicalTrials.gov translated into Spanish. We submitted the training set queries in English against a test bed of 7,170 ClinicalTrials.gov English documents, and compared MT and BTL against this English monolingual standard. The BTL approach was less effective (F = 0.420) than the MT approach (F = 0.578). A failure analysis of the results led to substitution of BTL dictionary sources and the addition of rudimentary normalisation of plural forms. These changes improved the CLIR effectiveness of the same training set queries (F = 0.474), and yielded comparable results for a test set of new 954 queries (F= 0.484). These results will shape our efforts to support Spanishspeakers' needs for consumer health information currently only available in English.
  9. Liu, S.; Liu, F.; Yu, C.; Meng, W.: ¬An effective approach to document retrieval via utilizing WordNet and recognizing phrases (2004) 0.03
    0.02630402 = product of:
      0.07891206 = sum of:
        0.07891206 = weight(_text_:f in 4078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07891206 = score(doc=4078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 4078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4078)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Rettinger, A.; Schumilin, A.; Thoma, S.; Ell, B.: Learning a cross-lingual semantic representation of relations expressed in text (2015) 0.03
    0.02630402 = product of:
      0.07891206 = sum of:
        0.07891206 = weight(_text_:f in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07891206 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    The Semantic Web: latest advances and new domains. 12th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2015 Portoroz, Slovenia, May 31 -- June 4, 2015. Proceedings. Eds.: F. Gandon u.a
  11. Kocijan, K.: Visualizing natural language resources (2015) 0.03
    0.02630402 = product of:
      0.07891206 = sum of:
        0.07891206 = weight(_text_:f in 2995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07891206 = score(doc=2995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2995)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  12. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.02
    0.023801928 = product of:
      0.07140578 = sum of:
        0.07140578 = product of:
          0.21421733 = sum of:
            0.21421733 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21421733 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3811574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04495835 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  13. Cruz Díaz, N.P.; Maña López, M.J.; Mata Vázquez, J.; Pachón Álvarez, V.: ¬A machine-learning approach to negation and speculation detection in clinical texts (2012) 0.02
    0.022779949 = product of:
      0.06833985 = sum of:
        0.06833985 = weight(_text_:f in 283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06833985 = score(doc=283,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.38137275 = fieldWeight in 283, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=283)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Detecting negative and speculative information is essential in most biomedical text-mining tasks where these language forms are used to express impressions, hypotheses, or explanations of experimental results. Our research is focused on developing a system based on machine-learning techniques that identifies negation and speculation signals and their scope in clinical texts. The proposed system works in two consecutive phases: first, a classifier decides whether each token in a sentence is a negation/speculation signal or not. Then another classifier determines, at sentence level, the tokens which are affected by the signals previously identified. The system was trained and evaluated on the clinical texts of the BioScope corpus, a freely available resource consisting of medical and biological texts: full-length articles, scientific abstracts, and clinical reports. The results obtained by our system were compared with those of two different systems, one based on regular expressions and the other based on machine learning. Our system's results outperformed the results obtained by these two systems. In the signal detection task, the F-score value was 97.3% in negation and 94.9% in speculation. In the scope-finding task, a token was correctly classified if it had been properly identified as being inside or outside the scope of all the negation signals present in the sentence. Our proposal showed an F score of 93.2% in negation and 80.9% in speculation. Additionally, the percentage of correct scopes (those with all their tokens correctly classified) was evaluated obtaining F scores of 90.9% in negation and 71.9% in speculation.
  14. Ahmad, F.; Yusoff, M.; Sembok, T.M.T.: Experiments with a stemming algorithm for Malay words (1996) 0.02
    0.021043215 = product of:
      0.06312964 = sum of:
        0.06312964 = weight(_text_:f in 6504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06312964 = score(doc=6504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 6504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6504)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Fattah, M. Abdel; Ren, F.: English-Arabic proper-noun transliteration-pairs creation (2008) 0.02
    0.01859975 = product of:
      0.05579925 = sum of:
        0.05579925 = weight(_text_:f in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05579925 = score(doc=1999,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proper nouns may be considered the most important query words in information retrieval. If the two languages use the same alphabet, the same proper nouns can be found in either language. However, if the two languages use different alphabets, the names must be transliterated. Short vowels are not usually marked on Arabic words in almost all Arabic documents (except very important documents like the Muslim and Christian holy books). Moreover, most Arabic words have a syllable consisting of a consonant-vowel combination (CV), which means that most Arabic words contain a short or long vowel between two successive consonant letters. That makes it difficult to create English-Arabic transliteration pairs, since some English letters may not be matched with any romanized Arabic letter. In the present study, we present different approaches for extraction of transliteration proper-noun pairs from parallel corpora based on different similarity measures between the English and romanized Arabic proper nouns under consideration. The strength of our new system is that it works well for low-frequency proper noun pairs. We evaluate the new approaches presented using two different English-Arabic parallel corpora. Most of our results outperform previously published results in terms of precision, recall, and F-Measure.
  16. Gomez, F.: Learning word syntactic subcategorizations interactively (1995) 0.02
    0.018412814 = product of:
      0.055238437 = sum of:
        0.055238437 = weight(_text_:f in 3130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055238437 = score(doc=3130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3130)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Szpakowicz, S.; Bond, F.; Nakov, P.; Kim, S.N.: On the semantics of noun compounds (2013) 0.02
    0.018412814 = product of:
      0.055238437 = sum of:
        0.055238437 = weight(_text_:f in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055238437 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Colace, F.; Santo, M. De; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Weighted word pairs for query expansion (2015) 0.02
    0.018412814 = product of:
      0.055238437 = sum of:
        0.055238437 = weight(_text_:f in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055238437 = score(doc=2687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02
    0.016243296 = product of:
      0.048729885 = sum of:
        0.048729885 = product of:
          0.09745977 = sum of:
            0.09745977 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09745977 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04495835 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  20. Martínez, F.; Martín, M.T.; Rivas, V.M.; Díaz, M.C.; Ureña, L.A.: Using neural networks for multiword recognition in IR (2003) 0.02
    0.01578241 = product of:
      0.04734723 = sum of:
        0.04734723 = weight(_text_:f in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04734723 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17919436 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04495835 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Years

Types

  • a 59
  • s 4
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • p 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…