Search (657 results, page 1 of 33)

0.053599387 = product of:
  0.107198775 = sum of:
    0.107198775 = product of:
      0.4287951 = sum of:
        0.4287951 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4287951 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.04466616 = product of:
  0.08933232 = sum of:
    0.08933232 = product of:
      0.35732928 = sum of:
        0.35732928 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35732928 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.041702382 = product of:
  0.083404765 = sum of:
    0.083404765 = sum of:
      0.052922964 = weight(_text_:1993 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052922964 = score(doc=823,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17458819 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.30313027 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.030481804 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030481804 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.

0.033951994 = product of:
  0.06790399 = sum of:
    0.06790399 = sum of:
      0.037422184 = weight(_text_:1993 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037422184 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17458819 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.21434546 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
      0.030481804 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030481804 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22

0.033951994 = product of:
  0.06790399 = sum of:
    0.06790399 = sum of:
      0.037422184 = weight(_text_:1993 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037422184 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17458819 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.21434546 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
      0.030481804 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030481804 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.031266313 = product of:
  0.062532626 = sum of:
    0.062532626 = product of:
      0.2501305 = sum of:
        0.2501305 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2501305 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.027161594 = product of:
  0.05432319 = sum of:
    0.05432319 = sum of:
      0.029937748 = weight(_text_:1993 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029937748 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17458819 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.17147636 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
      0.024385443 = weight(_text_:22 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024385443 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044996176 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

LIS genre studies have suggested that representing the genre of a resource could provide better knowledge representation, organization and retrieval (e.g., Andersen, 2008; Crowston & Kwasnik, 2003). Beghtol (2001) argues that genre analysis could be a useful tool for creating a "framework of analysis for a domain ... [to] structure and interpret texts, events, ideas, decisions, explanations and every other human activity in that domain" (p. 19). Although some studies of user-generated tagging vocabularies have found a preponderance of content-related tags (e.g., Munk & Mork, 2007), Lamere's (2008) study of the most frequently applied tags at Last.fm found that tags representing musical genres were favored by taggers. Studies of user-generated genre tags suggest that, unlike traditional indexing, which generally assigns a single genre, users' assignments of genre-related tags provide better representation of the fuzziness at the boundaries of genre categories (Inskip, 2009). In this way, user-generated genre tags are more in line with Bakhtin's (Bakhtin & Medvedev, 1928/1985) conceptualization of genre as an "aggregate of the means for seeing and conceptualizin reality" (p. 137). For Bakhtin (1986), genres are kinds of practice characterized by their "addressivity" (p. 95): Different genres correspond to different "conceptions of the addressee" and are "determined by that area of human activity and everyday life to which the given utterance is related" (p.95). Miller (1984) argues that genre refers to a "conventional category of discourse based in large-scale typification of rhetorical action; as action, it acquires meaning from situation and from the social context in which that situation arose" (p. 163). Genre is part of a social context that produces, reproduces, modifies and ultimately represents a particular text, but how to reunite genre and situation (or text and context) in systems of knowledge organization has not been addressed. Based on Devitt's (1993) argument suggesting that "our construction of genre is what helps us to construct a situation" (p. 577), one way to represent genre as "typified rhetorical actions based in recurrent situations" (Miller, 1984, p. 159) would be to employ genre tags generated by a particular group or community of users. This study suggests application of social network analysis to detect communities (Newman, 2006) of genre taggers and argues that communities of genre taggers can better define the nature and constitution of a discourse community while simultaneously shedding light on multifaceted representations of the resource genres.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.026799694 = product of:
  0.053599387 = sum of:
    0.053599387 = product of:
      0.21439755 = sum of:
        0.21439755 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21439755 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.026799694 = product of:
  0.053599387 = sum of:
    0.053599387 = product of:
      0.21439755 = sum of:
        0.21439755 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21439755 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.024385443 = product of:
  0.048770886 = sum of:
    0.048770886 = product of:
      0.09754177 = sum of:
        0.09754177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09754177 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.02233308 = product of:
  0.04466616 = sum of:
    0.04466616 = product of:
      0.17866464 = sum of:
        0.17866464 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17866464 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.02233308 = product of:
  0.04466616 = sum of:
    0.04466616 = product of:
      0.17866464 = sum of:
        0.17866464 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17866464 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.02233308 = product of:
  0.04466616 = sum of:
    0.04466616 = product of:
      0.17866464 = sum of:
        0.17866464 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17866464 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38147807 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.02155389 = product of:
  0.04310778 = sum of:
    0.04310778 = product of:
      0.08621556 = sum of:
        0.08621556 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08621556 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33
22. 4.2017 11:58:05

0.02155389 = product of:
  0.04310778 = sum of:
    0.04310778 = product of:
      0.08621556 = sum of:
        0.08621556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08621556 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38

0.02155389 = product of:
  0.04310778 = sum of:
    0.04310778 = product of:
      0.08621556 = sum of:
        0.08621556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08621556 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:06:44
22. 2.2018 12:13:53

0.021337263 = product of:
  0.042674527 = sum of:
    0.042674527 = product of:
      0.08534905 = sum of:
        0.08534905 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08534905 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.021337263 = product of:
  0.042674527 = sum of:
    0.042674527 = product of:
      0.08534905 = sum of:
        0.08534905 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08534905 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2013 16:18:36

0.021337263 = product of:
  0.042674527 = sum of:
    0.042674527 = product of:
      0.08534905 = sum of:
        0.08534905 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08534905 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27.12.2014 18:54:22

0.018289082 = product of:
  0.036578164 = sum of:
    0.036578164 = product of:
      0.07315633 = sum of:
        0.07315633 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07315633 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044996176 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:17:00